How to Defeat Your Enemies, by Robert Gore

Deception can be an effective tactic: the Trojan horse; Roosevelt promising in the 1932 campaign to cut government spending and balance the budget; the Allies fooling the Germans about where the D-Day invasion would land. What is neither generally recognized nor recorded in the annals of history is a tactic that has achieved far greater victories, the most powerful tactic of them all: getting one’s enemies to fool themselves.

Governments and their people are natural enemies. The former are parasites; the latter are hosts. For governments to survive, they must trick their people into believing they are necessary and beneficial, not coercive and parasitic. The easiest way to do so is to convince them that their security is threatened and that only the government can protect them.

Göring: Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.

Gilbert: There is one difference. In a democracy, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.

Göring: Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.

Interview with Gustave Gilbert in Hermann Göring’s jail cell during the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial (18 April 1946)

So it’s a simple matter for rulers to make war and get their people in line. Gilbert’s rejoinder is either disingenuous or quaintly naive. Göring’s formulation is correct as far as it goes, but his failure to realize its inherent contradictions is emblematic of the failure of the Nazis. Ultimately the lies rulers tell the ruled to justify and expand their power end up their own undoing as reality catches up with them. The Nazis solidified their grip on the German people, but because they waged war to establish and maintain their empire, which eventually exhausted their resources, and because their grip was based on lies, they failed. No regime has ever stood the tests of reality, truth, and time.

Which suggests a little understood strategy: use your enemies’ own lies to defeat them. Osama bin Laden has brilliantly demonstrated the awesome power of this strategy.

In the late 1990s, he led a small band of well-armed and fanatic Sunni Muslims in the caves of Afghanistan, with a few cells scattered around the globe. He despised the infidel West and particularly the US, which had established military bases in his native Saudi Arabia, home of Islam’s two holiest shrines, Mecca and Medina. He may have been envious of the West. Islam, with its harsh Sharia law, institutionalized subjugation of women, antipathy towards other faiths, sectarian conflict, and prohibition of interest on loans had sunken far below the West’s standard of living. For bin Laden and al Qaeda to consider attacking his economically and militarily powerful enemies, never mind defeating them, was seemingly insane.

As the leader of an ant colony trying to take down an elephant, bin Laden had to use his imagination. Like the ants, al Qaeda couldn’t attack frontally in force. To invade and subjugate the US would be virtually impossible; it could not be defeated on its own territory. He had to get his enemy to turn its power on itself. Ants would send small units to infiltrate the elephant and sting its most sensitive parts. For bin Laden, this meant a brazen attack on symbolically sensitive targets in New York and Washington. The goal of ants and al Qaeda was the same: inflame and enrage the enemy.

To employ the martial arts’ tactic of using an opponent’s weight against him requires proximity. Vietnam had demonstrated that the US could be defeated, or—to accept the characterization favored by that war’s few remaining proponents—outlasted, if it could be drawn into guerrilla warfare on unfamiliar territory. In their rage after 9/11, Americans were ready to believe their government’s lie that al Qaeda constituted an “existential threat.” That lie served the purposes of the US Military-Intelligence-Industrial complex—denied its raison d’être and potentially its lifeblood funding after the collapse of the last “existential threat,” the Soviet Union—and bin Laden’s. Within months he had a guerrilla war on his, not the enemy’s, territory.

Bin Laden’s was also well-served by the US decision to expand the war to Iraq in 2003. The American public, fed more lies about Saddam Hussein’s weapons and ties to al Qaeda, endorsed more of the same tactics that were coming up short in Afghanistan. Hussein was deposed and executed, but the US-backed, Shiite-dominated “democracy” that replaced him inflamed the always flammable Sunni-Shiite schism. Displaced, in many cases imprisoned, Sunnis who had enjoyed positions of power in Hussein’s government and military became the base for al Qaeda in Iraq. The rest, as they say, is history. Al Qaeda in Iraq would join with al Qaeda-affiliated rebels in Syria, and ISIS would be their progeny.

Look what bin Laden and his successors have wrought in 15 years! The US government is embroiled in wars across the Middle East from which it has no idea how to extricate itself. Its bombings, drone strikes, military advice and assistance, financial aid, boots on the ground, intelligence support, and overt and sub rosa political machinations have done nothing but waste blood and treasure, deepen its involvement, and create more recruits for al Qaeda and its offshoots. One offshoot, ISIS, controls significant portions of Syria and Iraq. The war there has drawn in not just the US but Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, and Hezbollah. It has also sent millions of refugees to Europe. Some are the vanguard of terrorist attacks, and potentially for future Islamic insurrection and domination. Al Qaeda has also capitalized on the US and NATO’s feckless removal of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, contesting for control of that virtually anarchic state and spreading its tentacles across Northern Africa.

Al Qaeda and its subsidiaries’ ever-expanding influence, in some cases domination, now extends from the island nations of Southeast Asia across the Middle East to northern Africa and Europe, a domain larger than either Alexander’s or Caesar’s empires. The ants have indeed found and repeatedly stung the elephant’s trunk, eyes, ears, and gonads, sending it crashing in a mad, self-destructive frenzy through the jungle (and desert). It has to rank as the greatest victory in the shortest time with the fewest resources in history. Anyone interested in knocking off governments should carefully study this campaign. Osama couldn’t have done it without the US government and its allies’ lies, delusions, and descent into evil. The “clash of civilizations” that once was, on the one hand, no more than self-serving propaganda dished up by the US powers that be, and on the other hand, nothing more than a fantastical bin Laden pipe dream, has now become the outcome towards which the world careens.

IT’S TIME FOR A GREAT BOOK

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK

24 responses to “How to Defeat Your Enemies, by Robert Gore

  1. Pingback: How to Defeat Your Enemies | NCRenegade

  2. Reblogged this on The way I see things … and commented:
    Liking the ant analogy. I have often referred to myself as an “ant”. For me it is because of the ant having to rebuild his home over and over through no fault of his own other than making the rooftop visible to someone who wanted to mush it up.

    As the leader of an ant colony trying to take down an elephant, bin Laden had to use his imagination. Like the ants, al Qaeda couldn’t attack frontally in force. To invade and subjugate the US would be virtually impossible; it could not be defeated on its own territory. He had to get his enemy to turn its power on itself. Ants would send small units to infiltrate the elephant and sting its most sensitive parts. For bin Laden, this meant a brazen attack on symbolically sensitive targets in New York and Washington. The goal of ants and al Qaeda was the same: inflame and enrage the enemy.

    Like

  3. Pingback: Two From Straight Line Logic | Western Rifle Shooters Association

  4. Muhammed Ali coined the phrase “rope-a-dope”, which also seems to fit…

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Amazing piece you wrote here Mr. Gore.
    All the more reason to live well, live free, in liberty.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks, I’m glad you enjoyed it.

      Like

      • More than enjoyed it. I think it is a succinct indictment and very instructional. Lot of informed thinking went into what you wrote is evident, you couldn’t have written it without a holistic grasp of all the variables and dynamics of history, economics, political corruption, totalitarianism, liberty, and the military industrial corruption that infects the federal Nomenklaturer class and its leaders. Lot in there about 4th Gen Warfare. William S. Lind would probably appreciate your insights. I do, find a lot of both you guys, and a couple other notable students of 4th Gen thinking crosses over. To tie it all together in a lucid form is a lick of thinking and work.
        There is a fellow name of Al Benson Jr, a real firebrand of a Copperhead,(I think Al coined the term). He wrote a seminal piece, if you haven’t read it figure you might appreciate it. Al is another writer who employ’s reason quite well too. In a fashion it is related to your piece, about administrative tyranny, actually Al’s piece comes from his writing about Gary North’s works on Political Polytheism and his remarkable book Conspiracy In Philadelphia, (which he put into pdf and made free to all). Al’s piece is an august essay/review of North’s book:
        ‘If Liberty Was the Object, Why Did They Give Us Centralism?’
        https://revisedhistory.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/if-liberty-was-the-object-why-did-they-give-us-centralism/

        Hey, Hat’s off to you Mr. Gore. I believe you deserve high regards for your works.

        Like

  6. mtnforge, I intend to check out the link when I get the time.

    Like

    • This a great piece of unrevised history you might find pretty interesting. A lot in it germane to what you wrote above. Quick read, no fluff or wasted context. Of course any history involving Patrick Henry is never dull.

      THE HISTORY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT
      David E. Vandercoy
      1994 Valparaiso Univ. Law Review. Originally published as 28 Val. L. Rev. 1007-1039 (1994)
      http://www.guncite.com/journals/vandhist.html

      Like

  7. The elephant has no way to stop the ant as long as he stays in the ant’s paradigm either. Time for some serious counter attack but our elected leaders are oblivious fools. For starters we need to agree Islam is not a religion and deserves no more protection than the nazis, the KKK, the Elks or the NAACP. Not a religion and start closing mosques that preach hate. TPTB won’t and we are doomed to suffer under this colossal evil in the near future. Fortunately when all are Moslems the slaughter will be epic.

    Like

  8. Pingback: STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  9. Pingback: How to Defeat Your Government | NCRenegade

  10. Pingback: Guest Post: How To Defeat Your Government | ValuBit

  11. Pingback: Guest Post: How To Defeat Your Government | DailyDeceit

  12. TI love the way you presente the example of the Germans, but NOT the Bolshevik scum, who were much WORSE than the Germans. Germans allegedly killed 6 million, Bolsheviks tortured & slaughtered 100+ million.

    THe Germans were defeated for no other reason than that 50 countries ganged up to bring down the prey. Imagine, 50!

    Like

  13. Pingback: Poate fi guvernul de tip capitalist, invins si eventual schimbat ? Cine o poate face ? Ce rol pot avea oamenii exploatati de acest sistem, in cadrul schimbarii lui? | Lupul Dacic

  14. Pingback: Poate fi guvernul de tip capitalist, învins și eventual schimbat ? | Romanian Global News

  15. Pingback: The Empire Will Strike Back, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  16. Pingback: The Empire Will Strike Back – aladdinsmiraclelamp

  17. Pingback: THE EMPIRE WILL STRIKE BACK – sentinelblog

  18. Pingback: Prieteni pocăiţi, nepocăiţi şi atei: Dacă iubiţi (doar cu vorba) pe Dumnezeu “invizibil” şi-l urâţi pe aproapele vostru, pe care-l ocoliţi innecat în suferinţe şi lipsuri; Dacă iubiţi păcatul, dar spuneţi că îl iubiţi şi pe Isus-

  19. Pingback: Prieteni pocăiţi, nepocăiţi şi atei: Dacă iubiţi (doar cu vorba) pe Dumnezeu “invizibil” şi-l urâţi pe aproapele vostru, pe care-l ocoliţi innecat în suferinţe şi lipsuri; Dacă iubiţi păcatul, dar spuneţi că îl iubiţi şi pe Isus-

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s