Coronavirus and Dodgy Death Numbers, by F. William Engdahl

Neither the tests for coronavirus nor the number of deaths attributed to it can be trusted. From F. William Engdahl at globalresearch.ca:

Not only are the coronavirus models being used by WHO and the most national health agencies based on highly dubious methodologies, and not only are the tests being used of wildly different quality, that only indirectly confirm antibodies of a possible COVID-19 illness. Now the actual designations of deaths related to coronavirus are being revealed to be equally problematic for a variety of reasons. It gives alarming food for thought as to the wisdom of deliberately putting most of the world’s people–and with it the world economy–into Gulag-style lockdown on the argument it is necessary to contain deaths and prevent overloading of hospital emergency services.

When we take a closer look at the definitions used in various countries for “death related to COVID-19” we get a far different picture of what is claimed to be the deadliest plague to threaten mankind since the 1918 “Spanish Flu.”

The USA and CDC definitions

Right now the USA is said to be the nation with far the largest number of COVID-19 deaths, as of this writing, with media reporting some 68,000 “Covid-19” deaths. Here is where it gets very dodgy. The Government agency responsible for making the cause of death tally for the country, the CDC, is making huge changes in how they count so-called novel coronavirus deaths

Continue reading→

 

 

4 responses to “Coronavirus and Dodgy Death Numbers, by F. William Engdahl

  1. Pingback: Coronavirus and Dodgy Death Numbers, by F. William Engdahl – Life, Death and all between

  2. Pingback: Coronavirus and Dodgy Death Numbers, by F. William Engdahl | Waikanae Watch

  3. Pingback: The Silver Lining… – SYFX+

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.