You can bet that the retraction will get far less press than the original flawed study. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:
The study, published on May 22 in the UK’s prestegious Lancet medical journal, relied on bogus data from a company called Surgisphere, which would not transfer the full dataset for an independent review, and “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.”
While the company that produced the original data, Surgisphere Corp., had signaled that it would cooperate with an independent review, it ultimately reneged and said doing so would violate confidentiality agreements, wrote the study authors. “As such, our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review,” the authors said. –Bloomberg
James Torado, a medical student with his own blog, researched and exposed Surgisphere which helped get the Lancet and NE Journal of Medicine articles –negative about hydroxchloroquine usage for COVID-19– retracted. What happened to the peer review process? Political pharmacology involved?
https://www.medicineuncensored.com/a-study-out-of-thin-air
Neil
I think there are at most three degrees of separation between any kind of science and the government, and as with anything that the government dominates, science has been corrupted. The only way to remedy that problem would be a complete separation of the two.
Reblogged this on uwerolandgross.