Were the U.S. to pursue diplomacy, the deal it and Ukraine would have to accept would be far worse that what they were offered at the onset of the war. The potential embarrassment is probably more responsible for the U.S. and Ukraine’s reluctance to search for diplomatic solutions than any other factor. From Kyle Anzalone at news.antiwar.com:
The Secretary of State called for Washington to continue to put militarism before diplomacy
The US will focus its efforts on arming Ukraine and not attempting to bring the war to a negotiated settlement, America’s top diplomat said. Secretary of State Antony Blinken laid out a plan to massively expand Kiev’s military before talks begin.
In a speech delivered in Finland on Friday, Blinken stated, “The United States – together with our allies and partners – is firmly committed to supporting Ukraine’s defense today, tomorrow, for as long as it takes.” He continued, “We believe the prerequisite for meaningful diplomacy and real peace is a stronger Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending against any future aggression.”
Blinken dismissed the idea of even a temporary pause in the fighting. “Some countries will call for a ceasefire. And on the surface, that sounds sensible – attractive, even. After all, who doesn’t want warring parties to lay down their arms? Who doesn’t want the killing to stop?” He said. “But a ceasefire that simply freezes current lines in place and enables Putin to consolidate control over the territory he’s seized…It would legitimize Russia’s land grab. It would reward the aggressor and punish the victim.”
as long as he dictates and others die, he is fine with the arrangement. reverse it and there would be peace quickly.