A proposal, a last chance, an ultimatum, by Lucas Leiroz

The Russians made a reasonable peace offer a couple of months after its war with Ukraine began. The U.S. and Great Britain turned it down. Now Putin has made another reasonable offer, albeit not nearly as good as the one that was previously rejected. The U.S. and NATO will undoubtedly turn it down. The Russians are winning, so their next offer will be worse. The offer the U.S. and NATO finally accept after cosmetic negotiations will be awful. Ukraine might not even be a country anymore. From Lucas Leiroz at strategic-culture.su:

Peace conditions recently exposed by Putin establish a new phase of the special military operation.

While the Kiev regime and its supporters continue to organize the “peace summit” in Switzerland, the Russian Federation is advancing its plans to bring a real end to the conflict. For Moscow, the conditions for peace or war are clear: either Ukraine recognizes the territories already liberated as Russian and promises neutrality, or the responsibility for the bloodshed from now on will lie entirely with NATO.

Russia has never been in any kind of “rush” in this conflict. With less and less casualties, an overwhelmingly economic growth, and having the opportunity to destroy NATO military software and neutralize foreign mercenaries, there is no reason for the Russians to want to quickly end hostilities. The Russian initiative to put forward peace terms is due to a sincerely humanitarian concern, since, unlike the Kiev neo-Nazi junta, decision-makers in the Kremlin see the Ukrainian people as a sister nation and a vital part of Russian civilization.

Since February 2022, Russia has constantly offered peace terms in accordance with the update of its strategic interests. Before the referendums for the union of the New Regions with the Russian Federation, Moscow’s demand was limited to the recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk as independent countries – there was not even any interest in reintegrating them into Russia at the time. It was Western interventionism in the peace negotiations and the fascist government’s subservience to NATO that prevented an agreement from being reached in the early stages of the special military operation.

The lack of guaranteed recognition for Donetsk and Lugansk led the war to continue and motivated these regions to ask to return to their eternal home (the Russian Federation). Then Ukrainian insistence on boycotting the normalization of life in Crimea led Russia to also reintegrate Kherson and Zaporozhye. For now, the four New Regions and Crimea (already reintegrated ten years ago) are Russia’s only formal territorial demands. The only thing Russia is asking for in addition to that is a guarantee of neutrality and demilitarization so that its civilian areas are not attacked, which Ukraine can provide simply by promising not to seek NATO membership.

Continue reading

One response to “A proposal, a last chance, an ultimatum, by Lucas Leiroz

  1. Sun von Rommel

    Vlad didn’t paint them [NATO] into a corner, they built that.

    Let them own it and you’ll see the enemedia drop any reporting as the KIA mount, other than the Russians are coming.

    There are still about three out of ten who think Brandon is doing a great job, that’s who the enemedia is for.

    The obedient who will go quietly to the abattoir don’t even know about the tremendous losses in 404 and probably don’t care.

    In the interview with Tucker he [VP] revealed that he considers them as brothers, maybe should have played that one close to the vest.

    No need for hostile resistance under occupation and maybe that is why he said it.

    Maybe the United States of BlackRock will demand some absurd Versaille requirements even with the losing hand and cause more trouble?

    Breaking from Statler Brothers:

    Flowers On The Wall

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.