There may be no more flagrant crime in science than falsifying data. The government has been caught red-handed. From Robert Malone at malone.news:
Inconvenient Truths? Just change the data. That’s the way you do it.

The initial report published by malone.news published Jan 03, 2026 0800h relied on an AI system (alter.systems) that generated links and information which later could not be verified. After further investigation, it became clear that the AI had fabricated some of those links and associated information. Therefore, some of the conclusions drawn were incorrect. This report has been updated to reflect those errors.
Executive Summary
The DMED (Defense Medical Epidemiology Database) scandal, or, more accurately, data manipulation revelation, was one of the most consequential disclosures of the entire COVID era. It cut to the core of how epidemiological data was curated, “corrected,” and used to sustain the official safety narrative during the COVID crisis.
DMED is the U.S. military’s central medical surveillance database, maintained by the Defense Health Agency (DHA). It contains decades of anonymized medical records for active-duty personnel, tracking everything from injuries and illnesses to vaccinations. Because service members undergo regular medical exams, DMED offers a cleaner epidemiological dataset than civilian databases.
During 2021–2022, several Department of Defense whistleblowers (notably including Drs. Theresa Long, Samuel Sigoloff, and Peter Chambers) identified anomalous spikes in numerous diagnostic categories starting in 2021, precisely coinciding with the mass COVID vaccination campaign among active-duty troops.
Since Secretary Kennedy was confirmed, there have been reviews of CDC’s information, data-gathering, and management practices. The HHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG) announced in Nov 2025 that it anticipates auditing “CDC’s Compliance With Federal Records Management Requirement”. An audit of VAERS COVID vaccine-associated mortality data has also been performed.