Lawrence Murray analyzes Hillary Clinton’s acceptance speech and fills in the many blanks. From Murray at alternative-right.blogspot.com:
I didn’t watch Hillary Clinton’s acceptance coronation speech at the DNC. I was at a meeting with some goyim discussing the creation of a deep state as means of bringing our society back from the abyss. Or maybe I was at a bar. The point is, I wasn’t going to subject myself to Clinton speaking for more than two minutes. The only people who appreciate that sort of pain are members of the Catlady Ascendancy and their numale serfs.
I did read the transcript though, or at least skim it for things to shitpost about, because that’s kind of my thing. Since I covered Trump’s assessment of the age of gloom—which naturally infuriated all the right people—I figured why not take a look at whatever franken-response Clinton’s speechwriters, focus group testers, and career bureaucrats could cobble together and zap with enough energy to make it seem lifelike. So without further ado, here are some highlights from the system’s disjointed attempt to appeal to as many goyim as possible:
When representatives from 13 unruly colonies met just down the road from here, some wanted to stick with the King. Some wanted to stick it to the king, and go their own way. The revolution hung in the balance. Then somehow they began listening to each other … compromising … finding common purpose. And by the time they left Philadelphia, they had begun to see themselves as one nation. That’s what made it possible to stand up to a King. That took courage. They had courage. Our Founders embraced the enduring truth that we are stronger together.
Clinton gives the kind of deracinated history lesson you’d expect from a kindergarten teacher in our marxist-infested education system. A couple of side notes here: Trump gets blasted all the time for using a small vocabulary and being repetitive, but Clinton’s history reads like a Simple English Wikipedia article. It’s also worth pointing out that a mention of the Founding Fathers was booed on an earlier night at the DNC. Anyway, according to this narrative, for some vague reason a vague group of people united vaguely against their king, which means we’re stronger together, even though a war of independence is a violent expression of anti-togetherness. So vote for togetherness because that’s what the Founders wanted—sort of, unless you count the part about separating from Britain by force. Strength through unity is also not necessarily an “enduring truth” either. Unless you’re a parasite speaking to your host.
Now we are clear-eyed about what our country is up against. But we are not afraid. We will rise to the challenge, just as we always have. We will not build a wall. Instead, we will build an economy where everyone who wants a good paying job can get one. And we’ll build a path to citizenship for millions of immigrants who are already contributing to our economy! We will not ban a religion. We will work with all Americans and our allies to fight and defeat terrorism.
Translation: We are blinding ourselves on purpose to the decline. We are terrified of Trump’s revolt against the neoliberal coastal elite. We’re not going to wall off future customers who want to come work and shop in the giant mall that we call the United States of America. In fact, we are going to enfranchise as many of these people as we can to make sure there is never another contested election between nationalists and globalists. And we aren’t going to stop the growth of a foreign creed on our soil because we prefer it to what the rural folk believe in. We will work to maintain American hegemony by sowing as much chaos as possible along the borders of Western civilization in order to justify our position, to strengthen Israel geopolitically by imploding Arab nationalist countries, and to destroy the national solidarity of European states by creating migrant crises.
To continue reading: Clinton Ex Cathedra
