In modern science, one ignores evidence contrary to one’s own hypothesis. From Steve Kirsch at stevekirschsubstack.com:
They ignore it, of course. Because that’s what good scientists do
Professor Gloria Choi specializes in autism research at MIT. I met with her in her office recently at MIT. I presented her with the evidence that vaccines cause autism. She was not interested in learning more or speaking out about this. Because that’s how science works at one of the world’s top scientific universities. If you want to keep your job, don’t rock the boat even if millions of kids pay the price for your silence.
Executive summary
Keeping your job in science is more important than speaking out when it is scientifically clear to you that your government is irreparably harming kids.
Background
I sent off yet another email to two top scientists at MIT who have a vested interest in autism. One is the head of the EECS Department at MIT. The other is a top autism researcher at MIT.
Both are smart enough to instantly recognize compelling evidence.
What do they do when confronted with uncomfortable data that is impossible for any competent scientist to ignore? They ignore it of course. Because that’s what all good scientists are trained to do: “stay in your lane and do not challenge the medical consensus or you will lose your job.”
They call their paymasters in order to download the current thing?
Muh science was killed with the COV-LARP.
Science has failed our world, spirit moves through all things.
(h/t-System Of A Down)