Those who get caught up in the government’s unconstitutional exercises of its authorities can spend years and millions of dollars to vindicate their constitutional rights. From el gato malo at boriquagato.substack.com:
a fundamental change is needed to close the loophole of judiciary timing arbitrage
imagine a world in which i could come to your house, take your car and refuse to give it back. “that’s illegal!” you would say. “that’s unconstitutional! it violates my right to property.” but how would you make and enforce this claim?
what if the police would not help you because they were told not to? what if there were a law allowing me to take your things or a government policy whereby the state asked, required, or threatened me into doing so?
now what?
well, you can go to court. you can challenge the actions. you can challenge the legality of the programs or legislation that enables it.
but what if by the time you can wind through 3-4 levels of courts, i’ve managed to put 300,000 miles on your car and there is really not even any point in getting it back and they removed the law anyway and so the courts never rule because the matter becomes moot?
and how are you to recover the years of having no car because you had had to pay for it and could not afford another?
are these issues even remediable?
lots of big questions here.
as many who have watched the last several years and decades are likely now seeing, this sort of issue is NOTHING like hypothetical. this has become the overt and deliberate strategy of lawmaker and governmental overreach.
Property is theft, comrade.
To each according to his need, workers of the world unite.
Pingback: whose rights are they? pre-emptive law challenge, by el gato malo | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC – Additional survival tricks
we have separation. it is time for divorce.
Pingback: Established Australian Election Process TOSSED OUT in a ruling by Victorian Civil Administrative Tribunal (Australia). – Additional survival tricks
Pingback: Established Australian Election Process TOSSED OUT by (Australian) Victorian Civil Administrative Tribunal in June 2023. IT IS ALARMING. – Additional survival tricks
Pingback: Australian Justice in Peril, Part 1: “Judge” claimed to have lost case citation number of the argument he accepted and followed. – Additional survival tricks
Pingback: Australian Justice in Peril, Part 2: “Judge” inexplicably omitted a submission made both orally and in writing and also misrepresented a claim from claimant. – Additional survival tricks
Pingback: Australian Justice in Peril, Part 3: “Judge” advocated for 51 percent of the people to take away the right of representation of the other 49. – Additional survival tricks
Pingback: Australian Democracy is being dismantled in plain view. – Additional survival tricks
Pingback: Australian Justice in Peril, Part 4: “Judge” allowed substitution of agenda item with non-agenda one that ambushed opponents at meeting. – Additional survival tricks
Pingback: Australian Justice in Peril, Part 5: “Judge” allowed agenda assigning only two lines for costly items resulting in one and a half pages in Minutes (actual report). – Additional survival tricks
Pingback: Australian Justice in Peril, Part 6: Rulings from Victorian Civil and Admin. Tribunal that are troubling for Victorians – Additional survival tricks