We know there’s a massive conspiracy against us, but it’s harder to pin down the conspirators. From Donald Jeffries at donaldjeffries.substack.com:
Identifying who’s really in charge
Most of those in the JFK assassination research community believe that a primary reason for the assassination was Kennedy’s reluctance to back a U.S. coup against Fidel Castro. Certainly, the number of anti-Castro Cuban figures around Lee Harvey Oswald, Davie Ferrie, and others at the ground level logically suggests that.
But as I have pointed out many times, to what is usually the total silence of my fellow researchers, if this was indeed a major motive for the assassination, then what changes resulted? LBJ never even mentioned Cuba during his presidency, and neither did anyone else in the political world. Cuba died as an American political issue along with JFK in Dealey Plaza. There was no second Bay of Pigs, this time with air cover. The CIA stopped trying to kill Castro. Neither Johnson nor Nixon ever even suggested trying to overthrow Castro. What about Reagan, great anti-commie that he was? Castro was still in power during the 1980s. What did Reagan do about that?
Decades of researching these subjects, starting with the JFK assassination, have taught me that motives are sometimes hard to discern in these matters. This is not because the motives are unclear, but because those seemingly investigating them create distractions. They send us in the wrong direction. This is what magicians do. Get you looking the other way. The entire Cuban connection to the JFK assassination, in my view, is one of these smokescreens. It bears repeating; if you assassinate Kennedy because he wanted rapprochement with Castro, then an invasion or coup in Cuba should logically come afterwards. It never did. So the conspirators failed, if that was their goal.
Wasn’t he against Vietnam?
The speech where he condemns the criminals in action and secret societies is from April 27, 1961.
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system that has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.”