The Hiroshima Myth, by John V. Denson

The decision to drop the bombs had more to do with the Soviet Union than it did with Japan. From John V. Denson at mises.org:

Every year during the first two weeks of August the mass news media and many politicians at the national level trot out the “patriotic” political myth that the dropping of the two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 caused them to surrender, and thereby saved the lives of anywhere from five hundred thousand to 1 million American soldiers, who did not have to invade the islands. Opinion polls over the last fifty years show that American citizens overwhelmingly (between 80 and 90 percent) believe this false history which, of course, makes them feel better about killing hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians (mostly women and children) and saving American lives to accomplish the ending of the war.

The best book, in my opinion, to explode this myth is The Decision to Use the Bomb by Gar Alperovitz, because it not only explains the real reasons the bombs were dropped, but also gives a detailed history of how and why the myth was created that this slaughter of innocent civilians was justified, and therefore morally acceptable. The essential problem starts with President Franklin Roosevelt’s policy of unconditional surrender, which was reluctantly adopted by Churchill and Stalin, and which President Truman decided to adopt when he succeeded Roosevelt in April of 1945. Hanson Baldwin was the principal writer for the New York Times who covered World War II and he wrote an important book immediately after the war entitled Great Mistakes of the War. Baldwin concludes that the unconditional surrender policy

was perhaps the biggest political mistake of the war….Unconditional surrender was an open invitation to unconditional resistance; it discouraged opposition to Hitler, probably lengthened the war, cost us lives, and helped to lead to the present aborted peace.

The stark fact is that the Japanese leaders, both military and civilian, including the emperor, were willing to surrender in May of 1945 if the emperor could remain in place and not be subjected to a war crimes trial after the war. This fact became known to President Truman as early as May of 1945. The Japanese monarchy was one of the oldest in all of history, dating back to 660 BC. The Japanese religion added the belief that all the emperors were the direct descendants of the sun goddess, Amaterasu. The reigning Emperor Hirohito was the 124th in the direct line of descent. After the bombs were dropped on August 6 and 9 of 1945, and their surrender soon thereafter, the Japanese were allowed to keep their emperor on the throne and he was not subjected to any war crimes trial. The emperor, Hirohito, came on the throne in 1926 and continued in his position until his death in 1989. Since President Truman, in effect, accepted the conditional surrender offered by the Japanese as early as May of 1945, the question is posed, “Why then were the bombs dropped?”

Continue reading

3 responses to “The Hiroshima Myth, by John V. Denson

  1. The Ecstasy Of Gold's avatar The Ecstasy Of Gold

    Stalin knew all about it thanks to Fuchs and others.
    He told Truman to just do it, use your weapon at Potsdam in 1945.
    When you look that up…page can’t be displayed.
    O/T-What is up with the RF/CCP naval flotilla up north near Alaska, don’t they fear the fabulous rainbow rump rangers?

  2. Because payback is a bitch. Karma dropped the bombs.
    Just ask a Chinese from Nanking. Easy to guilt from
    hindsight, without any direct link to the moment. My
    Uncle Raymond could tell you why. He left a leg out
    in the South Pacific. From the death marches to Unit
    731, a multitude of voices would explain it to you.

  3. The Japanese historians have the minutes of the meeting of the war council that voted and they were evenly split on offering surrender. The nuclear weapons and their effects were not even discussed, they were concerned about the entry of the Russians into the war and that they might be divided up or given to Russia, this is the fear that drove them.
    There is no way to know for certain what they were thinking when offering prior surrenders before the bombings, they had realized that they had lost the war and wanted to surrender with the one condition of keeping the emperor. Their offer had been rejected several times before and the war kept coming at them, the Americans willing to kill all who resisted. Did they fear annihilation of their civilization no matter who won the victory? Is that why this time they were divided about what to do? The emperor had to break the tie and he told them to accept defeat. They still held out for the protection of their emperor and their way of life. This time it was acceptable and Russia was kept out of the spoils of war of Japan, although they got Manchuria and North Korea.

Leave a Reply