“Hesitancy” About the Drugs that Weren’t Vaccines . . . and Now EVs, by Eric Peters

It’s amazing how hesitant people get about buying garbage products. From Eric Peters at ericpetersautos.com:

When “hesitancy” about being voluntarily injected with the drugs that turned out to not be vaccines became a thing, it became another thing.

A pushed thing.

Things got to the point that people who refused to take the drugs being pushed were threatened with loss of employment (and with it, career, in the case of people in occupations such as airline pilots, doctors, nurses and so on).

Will it get to that point with EVs?

Right now – and for now – people are still free to opt-out of “electrification.” And the evidence accrues that many are doing exactly that as word about the adverse events people who’ve already bought into “electrification” are experiencing.

Such as the very public experience of Ford CEO Jim Farley, who tried mightily to make excuses for the EV’s failings that echo eerily of the way those pushing the drugs tried to make excuses for their failure to immunize the people who took them. Who assumed that’s what they’d be getting. Instead, many of them got myocarditis and other unpleasant things. But – never mind that, said the drug pushers. These drugs will reduce the severity of symptoms and that will reduce the number of hospitalizations and that, in turn, will help reduce the burden on hospitals.

Continue reading

2 responses to ““Hesitancy” About the Drugs that Weren’t Vaccines . . . and Now EVs, by Eric Peters

  1. The two things that will be most likely to be orchestrated by “the Thing” – and those lesser “things” in power, will be these:

    The cost of continuing to own an ICE powered vehicle will be made (read government mandates that drive the cost of them and their fuel, UP!) to rise even more so than they have thus far.

    The corporate “things” that chose to produce EV’s that they KNEW would not sell in the American market, will go to the “thing” to which they acquiesced and beg for “relief!”

    The result of #2 is that those who best agree to further acquiesce will get the best “relief.”

    The result of #1 will be further destruction of our way of life and what we had foolishly come to take for granted.

  2. What about the Nuremberg Code regarding medical experimentation on humans?
    I think it is number six and it says not without consent.
    OBrandon is going to fire this stale COV-LARP up to distract from all the only getting worse which is a feature to his handlers.

Leave a Reply