Just like last time, they’re going to try to make you feel guilty about someone else’s illness. From Eric Peters at ericpetersautos.com:
You have probably been hearing about “masking” again – via the same “media” that is once again advertising what those who paid for the ads want advertised. Isn’t it astounding how little attention is paid to such conflicts-of-interest? Including the interests of the advertisers – i.e., the drug cartels – who reaped billions by pushing drugs millions were all-but-forced to take.
In order that they might – at last – be allowed to take off the “mask” and go back to living, again.
The irony of the insouciance is even more striking when one reflects that the most insouciant – indeed, the most strident advocates for (and defenders of) the drug pushing and the “mask” wearing were the very people who used to rail stridently about such conflicts-of-interest. But that was before the Left became the Man – and bought control of corporate America and the “media.”
But this time, we have the advantage of foreknowledge.
We know what these pushers have in mind. And we know it is based on calculated hysterics, just the same as last time. This is our weapon against them. The one they used against us last time was the default tendency of the non-psychopathic brain to assume the best rather than the worst – as regards the intentions of others. And – usually – this is reliably reasonable as most people are not psychopaths. They may be annoying to you. They may not have the same opinion as you. But they are not consciously malignant. They do not mean to harm you. Unlike the psychopaths, who are indifferent to the suffering they plan to impose in order to further their plans. If the psychiatric literature is correct, better than 98 percent of us do not think like that – and have difficulty thinking (understanding) that there are people like that.
