Scott Ritter: Why the Pentagon is a multitrillion-dollar fraud

The U.S. spends more on its military than the next ten nations combined. From Scott Ritter at rt.com:

The US Department of Defense has failed its sixth annual audit in a row, but taxpayer money will keep going down that drain

Scott Ritter: Why the Pentagon is a multitrillion-dollar fraud

FILE PHOTO: Two U.S. Air Force F-35 Lightning II aircraft at the international airport Petrovec near Skopje, on June 17, 2022. ©  Robert ATANASOVSKI / AFP

Recently, the Pentagon admitted it couldn’t account for trillions of dollars of US taxpayer money, having failed a massive yearly audit for the sixth year running.

The process consisted of the 29 sub-audits of the DoD’s various services, and only seven passed this year – no improvement over the last. These audits only began taking place in 2017, meaning that the Pentagon has never successfully passed one.

This year’s failure made some headlines, was commented upon briefly by the mainstream media, and then just as quickly forgotten by an American society accustomed to pouring money down the black hole of defense spending.

The defense budget of the United States is grotesquely large, its $877 billion dwarfing the $849 billion spent by the next ten nations with the largest defense expenditures. And yet, the Pentagon cannot fully account for the $3.8 trillion in assets and $4 trillion in liabilities it has accrued at US taxpayer expense, ostensibly in defense of the United States and its allies. As the Biden administration seeks $886 billion for next year’s defense budget (and Congress seems prepared to add an additional $80 billion to that amount), the apparent indifference of the American collective – government, media, and public – to how nearly $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars will be spent speaks volumes about the overall bankrupt nature of the American establishment. 

Continue reading

One response to “Scott Ritter: Why the Pentagon is a multitrillion-dollar fraud

  1. That’s a nice printing press you have there and it would be a shame if an air force or armored column moved on it.

Leave a Reply