Soon, instead of you directing your car, you’ll be obeying it. From Eric Peters at ericpetersautos.com:
It’s not just the presidential selection that’s coming up this November. Right around the same time that the country will be forced to choose between Orange Man and Senile Man – none of the above never being allowed in “our democracy” – the “rule” forcing what has been marketed to the public as anti-“drunk driving technology” will be “finalized” by the federal regulatory apparat.
All of the foregoing bracketed in air-fingers quote marks to mark the oleaginous verbiage of the authoritarians who use it to obscure what they actually mean.
And intend.
The “rule” – it sounds so innocuous – is in fact a mandate that will be enforced. “Finalized” means the details of what will be imposed, with force ensuring compliance. All of this decided by a cohort of burrowed-in bureaucrats no one ever voted for in “our democracy.”
As for “drunk driving”:
The term is used interchangeably with “impaired” driving – the latter term encompassing all kinds of driving that has nothing to do with whether you’ve been drinking. It encompasses driving contrary to the rules – which they intend to equate with “impairment” – thereby draping moral opprobrium over the shoulders of any driver who deviates in any way from the rules. Such a driver is the equivalent of “drunk,” you see.
I fart on their car seat and may it linger for hours.
I can’t accept the public or their neurotic Karen needs.
I’ll ride a bike or walk before riding in some state owned Zil Trabant mobile as driving and certain sections of the internet are the last bastions of freedom besides the handy ol’ man cave.
Thank You God for making me this way.