Just think, when the financial crisis arrives, your claim to your securities will be behind the claims of Goldman Sachs and the other big derivative dealers. From Paul Craig Roberts at paulcraigroberts.org:
In Part 1 ( https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2024/04/11/the-great-dispossession/ ), I reported that we already do not own anything. The immediate response from readers is: what can we do to avoid dispossession? Offhand, the answer might appear to be debt-free property and gold and silver in personal possession. However, if the goal is that we own nothing and are controlled under a digital currency regime, these assets will be taken as well.
Webb says if the billionaires and large financial institutions can be made aware of the situation, they could make Congress aware of the regulatory changes and force Congress to use its law-making power to undo the regulatory changes. After all, if there is no private financial property, there is no one to contribute to Congressional elections. Billionaires’ campaign donations elect the politicians, and what the regulatory changes do to billionaires is to reduce them to the same poverty as a homeless person. What the changes mean for large financial institutions such as Merrill Lynch, Schwab, etc., is their existence ceases. Webb’s hope is the combined influence can undo the regulatory changes. The question is whether awareness can be generated. The fate of Congress is also at stake. In the Great Reset there is no input from the people and no function for Congress.
As in all of my writings, I am trying to bring awareness. Little doubt the messenger will be shot.
The purpose of Part 2 is to outline the regulatory changes that have been made that have turned our property in financial assets into the property of “secured creditors.” Webb terms them legal changes, which they are, but as I read it from regulatory, not legislative, action. Webb says the changes are global, but he only describes how the US and EU effected the changes for themselves. I am unable to imagine that Russia, China, Iran and any parts of the world not captured in the Western financial system are parties to the dispossession, especially under the regime of sanctions. As I read it, the dispossession that awaits is limited to the Western world and its captive countries. By global, perhaps Webb means the global operations of Western world financial organizations.
Related to dispossession, with more s than Mississippi, the newcomer replacement, comrade commissar Mayorkas of Das Heimat Schutze is tied in with Sorrows Voldemort in illegal voting.
It reports vote Brandon 2024 signs in Matamoros and other places with CPUSA (D) voter packs in their schwag bags.
I went there with Pappy on the best vacation ever and was shocked by the commie signs everywhere and got a good history lesson about South America from elite recon unit veteran, this was mid 1980s.
No vote on the Cloward-Piven Fundamental Transformation in muh democrackracy?
How will the feckless losers of the Grand Old Politburo explain it when they drop the ball again on the peach mints?
Sad Trombone.
(h/t-NA)