“Stunning On Multiple Levels”: DOJ Admits To Evidence Tampering In Trump Classified Docs Case, by Tyler Durden

This “should” get the case thrown out of court. We all know why there are quotation marks around “should.” From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team admitted on Friday that key evidence in Trump’s classified documents case was altered or manipulated – leaving two different chronologies; one that was digitally scanned vs. what’s in the actual boxes.

Smith also misled the court, after originally telling U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon that the boxes remained “in their original, intact form as seized,” when in a footnote they conceded that they removed classified documents and left placeholder sheets, which prosecutors acknowledged has created an “inconsistent” record – in which some of the documents are no longer in the same order as they appear in digital scans made in the fall of 2022.

“The Government acknowledges that this is inconsistent with what Government counsel previously understood and represented to the Court,” the footnote reads, according to Just the News.

The finding comes after Cannon ordered a review into whether the FBI may have seized legally privileged records in response to a request from Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta.

“Since the boxes were seized and stored, appropriate personnel have had access to the boxes for several reasons, including to comply with orders issued by this Court in the civil proceedings noted above, for investigative purposes, and to facilitate the defendants’ review of the boxes,” wrote Smith’s team in the Friday filing.

Continue reading

One response to ““Stunning On Multiple Levels”: DOJ Admits To Evidence Tampering In Trump Classified Docs Case, by Tyler Durden

  1. They were looking for what Trump had on them?

    One thing Trump is not…stupid.

    Also the preezy of the steezy can take any document that he damn well pleases and where are all those docs that Obama never turned over?

    Meep Meep

    Breaking from Twisted Sister:

    Burn In Hell

Leave a Reply