“I’ll just say that as an attorney with decades of legal experience, I can tell you that this is the weakest case I’ve ever seen. It’s a jumble of novel legal theories strung together in pursuit of a predecided outcome.” Pretty much says it all, from James Rickards at dailyreckoning.com:
As you know by now, Donald Trump was found guilty yesterday on all felony counts in his hush money trial in New York.
Sentencing in the case is scheduled for July 11, 2024. That’s just four days before the Republican National Convention begins in Milwaukee on July 15. That’s not a coincidence, by the way. It’s calculated to further tarnish his image ahead of the convention.
It’s part of the pattern of lawfare and abuse of the judicial system that began with the Russia hoax in 2016 even before Trump was elected president that year. The campaign against Trump only increased from there, which included two impeachments.
I wasn’t at all surprised by yesterday’s verdict — I’ve predicted that Trump would likely be convicted in at least one of the several criminal trials against him. This is what I wrote eight months ago:
The Trump indictments are already handed up. There are two federal cases, two state cases and 91 felony charges in total.
Trump is highly likely to be convicted of something because the jurisdictions were carefully selected by Democrat prosecutors to be 90% Democrat… so the jury pools will be out to convict Trump…
None of the possible defenses or defective charges may matter. Trump’s lawfare opponents among the prosecutors carefully selected the venues to maximize the likelihood of a conviction… The venues were chosen to ensure anti-Trump juries.
Read earlier that a CPUSA (D) comrade prosecutor did the same to Saint MLK (s/) back in the 1960’s, elevating misdemeanors out of thin air and using Lawfare.
This just in regarding the passport confiscation and denial of the freedom to move about of Scott Ritter:
“Was this done in accordance with the First Amendment, or the Fourth,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said, commenting on the news. The first amendment to the US constitution protects freedom of speech, press and assembly, while the fourth bars the government from “unreasonable searches and seizures.”
(h/t-RT)
This just in from Sturmführer:
Fur Immer Glorreich