Will the coming election make or break America? By Constantin von Hoffmeister

The election won’t divide the country; it’s already divided. It may, however, lead to an actual division into two or more jurisdictions. That wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing. From Constantin von Hoffmeister at swentr.site:

The 2024 presidential contest carries apocalyptic potential for the US, as tensions threaten to split the nation

FILE PHOTO. Pro-Trump (R) and anti-Trump demonstrators argue at the Michigan state capitol in Lansing, Michigan. ©  John Moore/Getty Images

As the 2024 US election nears, tension is rising across the nation, fueling fears that the American republic itself hangs in the balance.

For some, this election presents the risk of a final fracture, one where states weary of federal overreach might assert their autonomy and challenge Washington’s hold. Supporters of a more decentralized America argue that a return to local governance could strengthen the republic, while critics warn it may signal the beginning of a dissolution of that which once bound the states by family ties and shared purpose. With the world watching, the outcome of the election may determine whether America endures as a unified power or breaks up into a mosaic of rival territories, each proclaiming its own justice.

Many foresee an era of upheaval – one that may bring the nation closer to collapse than ever before. The election, many argue, could serve as a sword dividing the states, slashing the bonds of unity that held them through trials and bloodshed. A wave of mistrust washes ashore with each campaign promise and counterattack, feeding a monster that has been lurking since the nation’s founding. Dread grows that strong states like Texas may finally cast off the federal chains, carving paths as sovereign lands should they sense betrayal from a distant capital.

Some voices call for the wisdom of disaggregated administration, suggesting that perhaps strength lies not in a vast, singular realm but in federated regions, united only by a loose pact. For these, the nation’s greatness could thrive in a non-monolithic structure, one that allows each region to wield its own power and champion its distinct traditions. They see this as a way to preserve the land’s beauty, avoiding the stain of forced conformity and letting each region flourish like a proud kingdom unto itself. But others see this as the beginning of the end, a shattering of the once-mighty republic, a descent into fractious states wary of neighbors and embittered by ancient rivalries.

Continue reading