You don’t want Trump determining who is and isn’t a “terrorist.” From Doug Casey at internationalman.com:
International Man: The official story surrounding Charlie Kirk’s assassination has been eclipsed by the flurry of information that something bigger and more nefarious could be at play.
Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and journalist Max Blumenthal have made serious claims about powerful donors who were displeased with Kirk in the days before his death.
What do you make of all this?
Doug Casey: First, let me say that I was only marginally familiar with Charlie before this. I wasn’t his market, and he was just a name. And even now, all I really know is snippets of his speeches. I could go back and listen to his podcasts. But what he actually said or believed isn’t that important. What’s important is what people think he said or believed. The Wokesters clearly hate him.
From what I can tell, he seems like a decent, sincere guy—well-read, thoughtful, well-intentioned. But I’m automatically suspicious of anyone who’s been out trying to change the world since age eighteen.
Has anyone assisted him in his quest?
My understanding is that most of his funding, which was substantial, came from Zionists. He was always a huge fan of the Republican Party.
That’s understandable in that it’s a better alternative than the completely toxic Democratic Party. I presume he supported Israel because it’s ethnically European, has always presented itself as a US ally, and evangelical Christians believe it will play a part in immanentizing the eschaton.
All we know, however, is what we see and hear in the media. And Charlie was a media phenomenon. But, it’s said, he was changing his views towards Israel. He was feeling controlled by them and felt threatened. Some say that Israel took him out because he was going off the reservation and questioning their party line. Independent thinkers are dangerous and unwelcome in the world of realpolitik.
Anyone who doesn’t take a loyalty oath to Israel is a terrorist.
The Bolshevik Red Pest wants Russia 1917 because new ideas are not their strong suit.
The Grand Old Politburo will send out a sternly worded letter after a reacharound across the aisle?
Please face wall now comrade is going to be glorious for the useful idiots.
After all, a few eggs have to be broken on the road to workers utopia.