The American people find themselves in the same place they’ve been so many times before. They know the official story is full of shit, but they don’t, and may never, know the real story. From Donald Jeffries at donaldjeffries.substack.com:
They NEVER tell the truth
I don’t know how long this Charlie Kirk thing will last. It’s already been two weeks, which is a very long time in the short attention span of America 2.0. The event itself has been ignored by professional “journalists.” Maybe the Right will succeed in getting a school named after him. But the many anomalies will never be explained.
As always, the official narrative of the incident doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. Any scrutiny at all. This is why there is so little focus on the actual shooting. These government produced narratives are so nonsensical that it couldn’t be due to mere random incompetence, or bad storytelling. Let’s start with the autopsy. Was there even an autopsy performed? Who knows? The few sources that mention it either say that there wasn’t one, or that it hasn’t been released. An autopsy is required for homicides in Utah (and I believe all states). So, there must have been one. Why don’t we know for certain? As the late JFK researcher David Lifton used to say, it’s only the “best evidence” in a murder case. Even in the JFK assassination, when they were in the midst of launching the coverup of all coverups, an autopsy was publicly acknowledged. A shameful, shoddy one, to be sure, but an autopsy nonetheless. So we ought to be able to get an answer to a basic question like this. And yet we can’t.
As I touched on in my previous Substack piece about the Charlie Kirk incident, the ballistics simply don’t add up here. You can’t have a shooting without ballistics evidence. But the evidence presented is preposterous. A shot from the victim’s left will cause the victim to move in the opposite direction, according to the laws of physics. Did an apple fall on Sir Isaac Newton’s head or what? That didn’t happen in this case. When those pesky thought criminals on the internet kept asking where the bullet was, because there had been no reports regarding when and where it was found, they were at first ignored. However, the surgeon who operated on Charlie Kirk- and when did that happen- belatedly announced that the bullet had been found. Inside his neck. It was referred to as Charlie’s “last miracle,” as if he had performed others. “His bone was so healthy and the density was so impressive that he’s like the man of steel.” The surgeon declared, crediting Charlie’s rock hard neck with saving lives.
A 30-06 round from the front would leave a much larger wound?
Just read one about “security team” taking the cards out of devices and hiding them in caps.
This isn’t 1963 and someone should tell the OSS.
Reading about old Nick Cage movie called Snake Eyes which predicted the Kirk murder.
Too many coincidences as Popeye would say.