One of the glaring anomalies of Charlie Kirk’s murder was the treatment of the crime scene afterwards. From Kit Klarenberg at kitklarenberg.com:
Every day, grave questions and deeply concerning mysteries surrounding the September 10th murder of Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk multiply. Per the FBI, the case is open and shut. College dropout Tyler Robinson, an apparent political radical who despised the right-wing activist and influencer for “spreading hate”, seized the opportunity of Kirk’s appearance at Utah Valley University to take him out permanently. While the Bureau and mainstream media have worked overtime to convict Robinson in the court of public opinion, many are unconvinced.
Their doubt is understandable. Robinson turned himself in to police, as publicly-released photos of an individual wanted for questioning in relation to Kirk’s murder resembled him and he feared being killed in a SWAT raid on his home. Nonetheless, he denies responsibility, and the assassination scenario posited by authorities – including multiple clothing changes, Robinson twice leaving his rifle wrapped in a towel in nearby woods for police to find, while dawdling around UVU campus for hours after the shooting despite having the means to immediately flee afterwards in his car – is patently absurd.
What evidence has been released supporting his guilt ranges from woeful, to literally non-existent. For example, FBI Director Kash Patel has claimed Robinson wrote a letter confessing to the killing, only for it to be destroyed in uncertain circumstances by persons unknown. Still, unspecified “forensic evidence” apparently somehow confirms its contents. This letter was authored despite Robinson stating in private messages purportedly sent to his roommate and lover he “had hoped to keep this secret ‘till I died of old age.”
Those exchanges, contained in a publicly-available charging document against Robinson, have been subject to widespread allegations of fakery, and outright mockery. The texts are not replete with time stamps, and appear incongruously self-incriminating for a shooter who allegedly undertook extensive measures to cover his tracks – to the extent the communications effectively make a water-tight case against Robinson on behalf of authorities. Robinson is also quoted using terms such as “squad car” and “drop point”, among other language it seems highly improbable a 22-year-old left-winger would employ.
Always ask who benefits and who stands to lose.
Read about big shekel donors returning to TPUSA and another says that Mrs. Kirk is not what she is portrayed to be and as Paula White speaks jive the crowd goes wild.