Paul Craig Roberts does a good job of summing up unaddressed issues and unanswered questions. From Paul Craig Roberts at paulcraigroberts.org:
It has been one month and 10 days since Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and we still know nothing factual about it.
The information or disinformation that has come out is nonsensical. Andrew Kolvet, a spokesman for Turning Point USA and executive producer of The Charlie Kirk Show, said the doctor who examined Kirk told him that there was no exit wound. Yet, we are told that the bullet was fired from a 30-06 rifle used by the suspect Tyler Robinson. This is an impossibility. A 30-06 would have left little of Kirk’s neck or head. It is ammunition used for grizzly bear and moose.
There is no evidence that any media or FBI questioned the attending doctor concerning his report of no exit wound as reported by Kolvet.
An internet search reports that no bullet has been found. A suggestion is offered that perhaps it has been recovered but the news is being withheld “possibly due to ongoing forensic processing or investigative sensitivity.” After 40 days they are still examining a bullet? The only possible thing that could be sensitive about the bullet, if they have it, is it is not 30-06 caliber.
The bullet that blew out the back of President Kennedy’s skull and managed to continue its magical path and cause three more wounds was allegedly found intact on the floor of President Kennedy’s limousine. It was a less powerful caliber than the alleged 30-06 used to murder Kirk. The explanation handed to us dumbshit insouciant Americans is that Kirk was so strong that the bullet fragmented and does not exist.
Watched a James Earl Ray documentary on teevee.
A 30-06 (allegedly) in that one as well as “Raul” put him up to the whole thing.
But JER was a novice when it came to guns.
Patsy false flags are nothing new under the sun.
Some use it a little too much.