President Trump Claims We Need More AI Data Centers to Keep Up with China, by Patti Johnson

We currently have more data centers than China, and building more will probably end up as yet another government-funded boondoggle. From Patti Johnson at theburningplatform.com:

U.S. Data Centers: 5,426  China: 449

The truth? America already has more data centers than the rest of the world combined. We are not losing the race – we’re lapping the field. [1] [2]

Let’s do the math:

China has 1.42 billion people  USA has 347 million people (China has ~4× more people)

USA has 5,426 data centers  China has only 449

Per person:

  • 1 data center for every 64,000 Americans
  • 1 data center for every 3.2 million Chinese

Simple way to say it: The average American is 50 times more likely to have a data center “nearby” than the average Chinese.

President Trump wants even more AI data centers and he wants to Super-Size them into water and electricity guzzling mega monsters. This will make Big Tech and the Federal Government even more powerful and centralized – FASCISM.

Meta (Facebook) Data Center in Oregon

Trump is charging full speed ahead with a new executive order to steamroll his AI agenda (the same one he started in the “Big Beautiful Bill”). This time he’s hitting even harder: he wants to create a federal “AI Litigation Task Force” whose sole mission is to sue any state that dares slow down his plans. [3] [4]

In his own words on Truth Social:

“We MUST have one Federal Standard instead of a patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes…or China will easily catch us in the AI race.”

That post wasn’t just talk.  It’s the blueprint. The leaked draft executive order is the “Plan B” if Congress won’t play along.

Continue reading

One response to “President Trump Claims We Need More AI Data Centers to Keep Up with China, by Patti Johnson

  1. fourth world turd's avatar fourth world turd

    All of this for five breasted Photochops and the ghost of R Lee Ermey?

    Is it worth it?

    Oh, the Control Grid Matrix, escape by any means necessary.

Leave a Reply