It is an invasion, and government must stop it (that’s what governments are supposed to do). From el gato malo at boriquagato.substack.com:
calling things by their names
so here’s an honest question i’d like you to keep it in mind as you read this:
if we are not to call much of what has been going on in the west of late “an invasion” then what, candidly and frankly, are we to call it?
what are the words?
what is the name of this thing?
when large numbers of violent people come from abroad with no intention of joining a civilization but rather to pillage, attack, and to dominate it, how is one to describe this course of events?
and when the host nations themselves invite it in with open arms, defending and excusing it, what then are we to call that?
i’m not going to answer this question.
but i think you should.
because we are playing with the most dangerous of fire here and the stakes are about as high as stakes get.
yet again, this time in sydney, in a notably “gun free zone,” we see murderously effective attacks by devotees to the self-styled “religion of peace” upon innocents merely seeking to celebrate a holiday in peace. (in this case hanukkah) two islamic jihadis with rifles started shooting into crowds. they fired a great many times over 10 or 20 minutes, repeatedly stopping to reload. this was managed with what looked like bolt action rifles. ~16 were killed (reports vary) and another ~40 were injured. a car load of bombs/IEDs was also discovered. it has been posited this was for a “second wave” or potentially as a means to massacre first responders (police, ambulance), a common terror tactic that both produces more fear and makes responders hesitate in the future.
it likely would have been worse had not a brave (and unarmed) bystander tackled one of the shooters and disarmed him.
Loxism.
If the white race goes the planet will as well.
The built in firewalls are there.