Tag Archives: NSA

FBI Confirms No Major Terrorism Cases Cracked via Unconstitutional Patriot Act Phone Spying, by Michael Krieger

Civil liberty restrictionists like to say that the restrictions are worth it if they halt even one act of terrorism. What happens if they halt no acts of terrorism? From Michael Krieger at libertyblitzkrieg.com:

FBI agents can’t point to any major terrorism cases they’ve cracked thanks to the key snooping powers in the Patriot Act, the Justice Department’s inspector general said in a report Thursday that could complicate efforts to keep key parts of the law operating.

Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz said that between 2004 and 2009, the FBI tripled its use of bulk collection under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which allows government agents to compel businesses to turn over records and documents, and increasingly scooped up records of Americans who had no ties to official terrorism investigations.

– From the Washington Times article: FBI Admits No Major Cases Cracked with Patriot Act Snooping Powers

Back in 2013, as debate about the Snowden revelations was at its zenith, I published a post titled NSA Chief Admits “Only One or Perhaps Two” Terror Plots Stopped by Spy Program. Here’s an excerpt:

The Obama administration’s credibility on intelligence suffered another blow Wednesday as the chief of the National Security Agency admitted that officials put out numbers that vastly overstated the counterterrorism successes of the government’s warrantless bulk collection of all Americans’ phone records.

Pressed by the Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee at an oversight hearing, Gen. Keith B. Alexander admitted that the number of terrorist plots foiled by the NSA’s huge database of every phone call made in or to America was only one or perhaps two — far smaller than the 54 originally claimed by the administration.

“One or perhaps two.” Or perhaps zero. The guy has the nerve to say “perhaps.” How do you not know? What a bunch of lying assholes. How the heck does 54 turn into “one or two,” and I’ll tell you something else, I don’t believe the one or two figure for a minute. I mean there’s no way he would say “zero” when he is fighting to keep his petty little Stasi state intact. Furthermore, how about some details here. What was the one plot the NSA foiled? Some teenager throwing firecrackers on the White House lawn? These guys need to get lost already. From the Washington Times:

As time has passed and the years have gone by, it has become increasingly clear that the phone records collection program hasn’t stopped a single terror attack. In fact, a recently published report by the Justice Department’s inspector general admitted as much. This takes on increased significance with parts of the Patriot Act set to automatically sunset on June 1st.

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/05/22/fbi-confirms-no-major-terrorism-cases-cracked-via-unconstitutional-patriot-act-phone-spying/

To continue reading: No Major Terrorism Cases Cracked

Former NSA Official: Secret Phone Records Grab A Mistake, by Ken Dilanian

Former Federal Reserve Chairman gets attack of honesty. Former NSA officials admit bulk phone record collections are a mistake. One huge symptom of all that is wrong with our government is that nobody within the government publicly criticizes it until after they leave. From Ken Dilanian of the Associated Press, at hosted.ap.org:

The decision to keep secret the National Security Agency’s collection of American calling records was a strategic blunder that set the stage for Edward Snowden’s unauthorized disclosures and ultimately harmed U.S. national security, the agency’s former inspector general told NSA employees in blunt remarks Friday.

“You now live in a glass house,” Joel Brenner, NSA inspector general from 2002 to 2006, said in a speech marking the 40th anniversary of the congressional hearings into the intelligence scandals of the Watergate era. “How could anyone think the bulk collection program would remain secret?”

It’s not that there no longer can be national security secrets, said Brenner, a lawyer who retired in 2009 after serving as the top U.S. counterintelligence official. But “the idea that the broad rules governing your activities -not specific operations, but the broad rules-can be kept secret is a delusion. And they should not be kept secret.”

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_NSA_SURVEILLANCE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-05-15-10-33-21

To continue reading: Secret Phone Records Grab A Mistake

He Said That? 3/31/15

From Jeb Bush, on the “Hugh Hewitt Show,” as reported on breitbart.com:

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush stated that he is “nervous” about criticism of the NSA and that he wished the president would do a better job defending government surveillance systems on Monday’s “Hugh Hewitt Show.”

Bush said that lone wolf terrorism “is a serious threat in a world where we’re so connected with the rest of the world. We have people moving in and people moving out. People get their information now, not everybody gets to listen to your show to get all their information. People get their information in different ways. They get disaffected, disillusioned, preyed upon, and so yeah, I think that this is an ongoing threat, and I hope that our counterintelligence capabilities are always vigilant. I’ve always been nervous about the attacks on the NSA, and somehow that we’re losing our freedoms by keeping the homeland safe. I think we need to be really vigilant about that.”

He added, “I think the President has to lead, has to explain to people. He’s actually enhanced the intelligence capabilities, in many ways, because technology has gotten better. But he never defends it. He never explains it. He never tries to persuade people that their civil liberties are being protected by the systems we have in place. If people knew that, I don’t think there’d be any doubt that they would want to have the ability to identify people from the outside that may be trying to coordinate with some people in the inside.”

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/03/30/jeb-im-nervous-about-nsa-criticism-obama-should-defend-nsa/

Not that he had much of chance, but this probably dooms Mr. Bush with libertarians and the libertarian wing of the Republican party. It should doom him with everyone else as well, but there are a lot of people who will gladly exchange their freedom for a government promise of “security,” and who wouldn’t recognize the Fourth Amendment if it was read to them.

From USA To NSA In A Few Steps, from the Lonely Libertarian

From the Lonely Libertarian, via theburningplatform.com:

He Said That? 2/20/15

From Henry A. Crumpton, who led the CIA’s Afghanistan campaign from 2001-02 and retired in 2007, “America’s Eroding Antiterror Intelligence,” The Wall Street Journal, 2/20/15:

…The leaders are more experienced, more strategic and more ruthless. For example, enemy commanders are moving to fill political vacuums in the weak nation-states of Syria, Nigeria, Pakistan, Mali, Libya, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Egypt’s Sinai. Witness how ISIS commander Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi usurped local power from the brutal and corrupt Syrian and Iraqi regimes.

Further inhibiting US intelligence: The global network of allies so necessary for the U.S. to penetrate, analyze and destroy terrorist networks has eroded. In Libya and Yeman, both racked by civil war, the U.S. has abandoned its embassies. While some stalwart allies remain, many have lost faith in U.S. leadership. The perception of U.S. weakness and lack of strategic direction dissuades allies from policy and intelligence cooperation.

The traitor Edward Snowden and his accomplices exposed National Security Agency operations, providing the enemy with a huge advantage in deceiving and denying U.S. signals-intelligence collection. These publicized top-secret operations, some ill-considered, undercut the thrust of both foreign allies and U.S. private-sector partners.

Telecommunications, software, hardware and social-media firms have reduced their cooperation with U.S. intelligence and law enforcement—while boosting encryption against the U.S. government, FBI Director James Comey publicly criticized Apple and Google for their lack of support, warning: ‘There will come a day when it will matter a great deal to the lives of people…that we will be able to gain access.” Even before 9/11, a large percentage of actionable counterterrorism leads came from signals intelligence. This collection is now more difficult than ever.

Where to begin on this one? To make this easier, SLL has reprinted this quote below, with SLL commentary where appropriate.

…The leaders are more experienced, more strategic and more ruthless. For example, enemy commanders are moving to fill political vacuums in the weak nation-states of Syria [Syria would be stronger if we hadn’t tried to overthrow its ruler,] Nigeria, Pakistan, Mali, Libya [Libya would be stronger if we hadn’t joined the effort to overthrow Qaddafi, see Clinton’s War, The Carnage In Libya Is On You, Hillary, SLL, 2/4/15]  Iraq [that’s an odd thing to say about the puppet government we installed], Yemen, Somalia and Egypt’s Sinai. Witness how ISIS [ISIS is a direct offshoot of the rebel groups in Syria we aided in our attempt to overthrow its ruler] commander Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi usurped local power from the brutal and corrupt Syrian and Iraqi [that’s an odd thing to say about the puppet government we installed] regimes.

Further inhibiting US intelligence: The global network of allies so necessary for the U.S. to penetrate, analyze and destroy terrorist networks has eroded [because members of that global network found out you were spying on them]. In Libya and Yemen, both racked by civil war[that US intervention helped cause], the U.S. has abandoned its embassies. While some stalwart allies remain, many have lost faith in U.S. leadership [and US integrity, their faith in which vanished after they found out they were being spied on]. The perception of U.S. weakness and lack of strategic direction dissuades allies from policy and intelligence cooperation.

The traitor Edward Snowden and his accomplices exposed National Security Agency operations, providing the enemy with a huge advantage in deceiving and denying U.S. signals-intelligence collection [and the US public with confirmation that the government was spying on them, and knew virtually every detail of their lives]. These publicized top-secret operations, some ill-considered [this admission that some of the top-secret operations were “ill-considered” would never have been made had not that “traitor” Snowden revealed them], undercut the thrust of both foreign allies and U.S. private-sector partners.

Telecommunications, software, hardware and social-media firms have reduced their cooperation with U.S. intelligence and law enforcement—while boosting encryption against the U.S. government [after the tech companies started losing contracts and customers both here and abroad when it became apparent that they were being used by the U.S. government], FBI Director James Comey publicly criticized Apple and Google for their lack of support, warning: ‘There will come a day when it will matter a great deal to the lives of people…that we will be able to gain access.” [it matters a great deal to millions of people right now the amount of access the government already has to their lives] Even before 9/11, a large percentage of actionable counterterrorism leads came from signals intelligence. This collection is now more difficult than ever. [Good!!]

Snowden leak: NSA helped British steal cell phone codes, by Ken Dilanian

From Ken Dilanian at bigstory.ap.org:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Britain’s electronic spying agency, in cooperation with the U.S. National Security Agency, hacked into the networks of a Dutch company to steal codes that allow both governments to seamlessly eavesdrop on mobile phones worldwide, according to the documents given to journalists by Edward Snowden.

A story about the documents posted Thursday on the website The Intercept offered no details on how the intelligence agencies employed the eavesdropping capability — providing no evidence, for example, that they misused it to spy on people who weren’t valid intelligence targets. But the surreptitious operation against the world’s largest manufacturer of mobile phone data chips is bound to stoke anger around the world. It fuels an impression that the NSA and its British counterpart will do whatever they deem necessary to further their surveillance prowess, even if it means stealing information from law-abiding Western companies.

The targeted company, Netherlands-based Gemalto, makes “subscriber identity modules,” or SIM cards, used in mobile phones and credit cards. One of the company’s three global headquarters is in Austin, Texas. Its clients include AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon and Sprint, The Intercept reported.

The Intercept offered no evidence of any eavesdropping against American customers of those providers, and company officials told the website they had no idea their networks had been penetrated. Experts called it a major compromise of mobile phone security.

Gemalto said in a statement Friday it could not immediately confirm the reported hack and “had no prior knowledge that these agencies were conducting this operation.” The company said it “will devote all resources necessary to fully investigate” the reported hack.

A spokeswoman for Sprint Nextel said Thursday that her company had no comment on the report, while a spokeswoman for T-Mobile said her company was referring reporters to Gemalto and declined further comment.

In addition to SIM cards, Gemalto is a leading maker of encryption systems for other business and industrial uses, including electronic payment processing and “smart” key cards that businesses and government agencies use to restrict access to computers or other sensitive facilities. “Their SIM cards would be used by most of the major telecom operators,” said Linley Gwennap, principal analyst at the Linley Group, a Silicon Valley tech research firm.

The NSA did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In the past, former agency officials have defended using extra-legal techniques to further surveillance capabilities, saying the U.S. needs to be able to eavesdrop on terrorists and U.S. adversaries who communicate on the same networks as everyone else. The NSA, like the CIA, breaks the espionage and hacking laws of other countries to get information that helps American interests.

Still, the methods in this case may prove controversial, as did earlier Snowden revelations that the NSA was hacking transmissions among Google’s data centers. The Intercept reported that British government hackers targeted Gemalto engineers around the world much as the U.S. often accuses Chinese government hackers of targeting Western companies — stealing credentials that got the hackers into the company’s networks. Once inside, the British spies stole encryption keys that allow them to decode the data that passes between mobile phones and cell towers. That allows them to ungarble calls, texts or emails intercepted out of the air.

At one point in June 2010, Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters, or GCHQ, as its signals intelligence agency is known, intercepted nearly 300,000 keys for mobile phone users in Somalia, The Intercept reported. “Somali providers are not on GCHQ’s list of interest,” the document noted, according to the Intercept. “(H)owever, this was usefully shared with NSA.”

Earlier in 2010, GCHQ successfully intercepted keys used by wireless network providers in Iran, Afghanistan, Yemen, India, Serbia, Iceland and Tajikistan, according to the documents provided to The Intercept. But the agency noted trouble breaking into Pakistan networks.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/262d26edb39e4cab85c188cb5cb1b5ad/snowden-leak-nsa-helped-british-steal-cell-phone-codes