Man’s Pacemaker Used To Track And Charge Him With Crime, by Josie Wales

This is disturbing. From Josie Wales at

(ANTIMEDIA) Hamilton, OH — An Ohio man pleaded not guilty to arson charges Tuesday after police arrested him, in part, based on information obtained from the man’s pacemaker. According to officials, 59-year-old Ross Compton stands accused of burning his home down on September 15 and faces charges of aggravated arson and insurance fraud.

Police say they obtained a warrant to search all electronic information stored on Compton’s pacemaker when he gave statements that were not consistent with the evidence found at the fire. He told authorities that “he packed belongings when he saw the fire, threw them out of a window and carried them to his car.” According to court documents, a cardiologist who reviewed the data on the pacemaker determined “it is highly improbable Mr. Compton would have been able to collect, pack and remove the number of items from the house, exit his bedroom window and carry numerous large and heavy items to the front of his residence during the short period of time he has indicated due to his medical conditions.”

The case raises the issue of privacy rights with regard to sensitive medical data. Electronic Frontier Foundation Criminal Defense Staff Attorney Stephanie Lacambra is concerned that technological advancements will lead to a loss of individual privacy, with this case setting a dangerous precedent.“Cases like this could be the canary in the coal mine concerning the larger privacy implications of using a person’s medical data,” she told SC Media.

As Lacambra went to point out:

“Americans shouldn’t have to make a choice between health and privacy. We as a society value our rights to maintain privacy over personal and medical information, and compelling citizens to turn over protected health data to law enforcement erodes those rights.”


4 responses to “Man’s Pacemaker Used To Track And Charge Him With Crime, by Josie Wales

  1. I didn’t read that the man was actually tracked and located via the pacemaker(could be I just missed it). Anyway, time is getting near when we’ll all get the microchip in the back of the neck and this pesky privacy problem will disappear.


    • The headline is misleading. I think you see where this is going, though. They’ll just inject that microchip via an innoculation-like procedure, along with all the inoculations infants receive, and it will be bye-bye privacy.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I was also thinking that a good 1st step could be a microchip at Medicare signup or when one goes to college, enrolls for military service. And once the people are softened up, expand the program until = mandatory.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s