The Goolag Echopeligo, by Robert Gore

If you find the title confusing, DDG the works of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. ( is a search engine whose acronym is hereby designated as one of the replacements for the verb google.)

Warning: SLL is about to put forth two propositions that are so obvious they’re undoubtedly controversial. Readers offended by the obvious but controversial are advised to stop reading.

Proposition one: If Group A and Group B are competing for the same jobs and standards are lowered for Group B but not Group A, on average the members of Group B will not be as good at the jobs as members of Group A.

Proposition two: Men and women are different.

This, when you wade through James Damore’s excruciatingly diplomatic Google memorandum is the crux of what he said. SLL can say it but Damore couldn’t; Google fired him for “perpetuating gender stereotypes.”

Google’s highly compensated management and engineering jobs are held disproportionately by white males. Here’s a fact: the universal set of people inside and outside of Google who have the ability to write complex computer code, or have the ability to manage such people, is disproportionately white males. That may be changing, but as of August 13, 2017, that’s still a fact.

While perpetuating gender stereotypes supposedly got Damore the boot, the money portion of his memo nails the contradiction at the heart of diversity and affirmative action programs: lower standards for Group B in the interest of promoting “equality” is inherently unequal. Group A has been disadvantaged and Group B has received preferential treatment.

From James Damore’s Google memorandum:

The harm of Google’s biases

I strongly believe in gender and racial diversity, and I think we should strive for more. However, to achieve a more equal gender and race representation, Google has created several discriminatory practices:

• Programs, mentoring, and classes for people with a certain gender or race
• A high priority queue and special treatment for “diversity” candidates
• Hiring practices which can effectively lower the bar for “diversity” candidates by decreasing the false negative rate
• Reconsidering any set of people if it’s not “diverse” enough, but not showing the same scrutiny in the reverse direct (clear confirmation bias)
• Setting org level OKRs [Objectives and Key Results] for increased representation which can incentivize illegal discrimination

You can have equal treatment or preferential treatment, but you can’t have both. De jure unequal leads to de facto unequal, not de facto equal. It leads to two other consequences: the favored group will on average not do the job as well, and the unfavored group will know it.

A cherished goal of the diversity drones is to get the unfavored group to applaud not just the drones’ enlightened moral status, but to pretend that the favored group does just as good a job as the unfavored one, and that diversity of secondary traits (but not, evidently, diversity of thought) itself confers a benefit. It’s a subset of an “optics” problem that besets the entire redistributive racket: how do you get unfavored producers not just to go along with the scam and keep producing unearned benefits for the racketeers and redistributees, but to pretend they like it?

How a Google coder’s gender or gender identification, race, ethnicity, creed, or any other secondary characteristic will affect his or her ability to spot and fix the flaws in an algorithm is left unstated. But that’s not the diversity drones’ problem. Google makes so much money it can afford some less-than-stellar employees in service to enlightened ideals and the greater good. If members of the unfavored group can’t bring themselves to applaud, they should at least shut up. Or else!

Denounce the theory of evolution and you’ll be roundly condemned as anti-science. Turn around and accept the theory, point out that evolution’s prime directive is the propagation of a given species, that for humans each sex has an evolutionary role, that women’s evolutionary role is to bear and rear children, that men’s role is to protect and provide for the family, especially when the woman is pregnant and then nursing and is unable to do so, and that men and women are equipped with different hormones, sex drives, and yes, brain wiring to facilitate their differing evolutionary roles, and you will earn for yourself  a fusillade of criticism from the same people who were condemning your earlier stance against evolutionary theory.

The existence of differences, and what they might be, are questions for scientific inquiry. Repression is when you get shot for telling the truth. Totalitarianism is when you get shot for asking questions. We’re reaching the point where questions cannot be asked, and all sorts of energy is expended maintaining the fantasy that men and women are not different, that gender itself is merely a matter of choice and can even vary day-to-day.

We’re running into evolutionary dead ends. In the springtime of their lives, when both men and women’s fancy used to lightly turn to thoughts of love—and then marriage and procreation—appreciable percentages of both sexes hate each other. Many feminist groups despise men; men’s groups like MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way, aka Men Grabbing Their Own Weenies) despise women. One suspects that much of the antipathy stems from the eternal rejections and betrayals they’ve encountered with the opposite sex. In the good old days, the rejected and betrayed turned to lyric laments—“Your Cheating Heart,” “You’re No Good”—but didn’t lose romantic hope. Now they change their sexual orientation…or their sex…or embrace celibacy…or all of the above. And the birth rate continues to decline.

There is always one group of victims overlooked when standards are lowered for Group B: the members of Group B who meet the Group A standards. To say that computer coding skills might be more prevalent among men than women and minorities is not to say that no women or minorities have such skills, a point Damore bent over backwards trying to make (he even used illustrative graphs). He urged stepping up “nondiscriminatory” efforts to find them.

The women and minorities who make the “A” grade should be more upset at the lowering of standards than their white male coworkers. They will be unfairly stigmatized, and their advancement within Google will come with an asterisk—winks and nods that they climbed the diversity, not the talent and achievement, ladder.

That is an injustice against these individuals. However, in Google’s brave new world there are only groups, not individuals. Individual James Damore questioned the new order. Google exercised its right to fire him and intimidate everyone else. However, the decision to seek employment with a company is an individual one, as is the decision whether to stay or leave.

The kind of people who draw top dollars and stock options at Google have rare talents and are always in demand. Some of them may depart for companies eschewing today’s fashionable but counterproductive doctrines, where they and their coworkers will be judged on their own merits, not secondary characteristics. In its echo chamber—the Goolag Echopeligo—Google can maintain the fiction that Group A can be replaced by Group B, but competitive edges are remarkably ephemeral. The technology landscape is littered with the corpses of yesteryear’s hot new thing.

The decision to use a particular technology is also an individual one. Individuals critical of Google can refuse to use its products and services. There are plenty of other competitive technologies. DuckDuckGo claims it doesn’t track you. DDG your next search!






40 responses to “The Goolag Echopeligo, by Robert Gore

  1. I am glad there are differences in men and women. I like men better – has been my downfall at times he he
    My mother worked PT for Google (after a 35 year career in IT with another firm). She was instrumental in a huge Google transformation in Los Angeles.
    When she left she became a Google Certified teacher.
    I love the Google applications and when I taught technology it was using only those applications.
    I still only use Google apps (haven’t used anything Windows in 10 years). I really all the tracking/spy that may be happening and take precautions with passwords/location tacking etc. but have nothing to hide.


    • You’re on SLL all the time. That puts you in the “Something to Hide” category.


      • This reminds me of something I’ve been meaning to ask for awhile. Are your pre-WordPress articles archived somewhere? The link in this comment gives a Not Found error. I didn’t take your advice to (paraphrasing from memory) “print this out and save it in case it turns out in a few years to not be paranoia”. It did (putting it mildly) and the piece would be well worth a reprise if you’ve still got it.

        The Goolag Echopeligo
        Epic. Grand. Slam.

        . . . exercised its right . . .


        • ikdr,
          I know what article you are talking about, but I don’t remember the title. I’ll have to go back to the pre-WordPress records and see if I can dig it out, but that will take some time. Thanks, once again, for the typo.


          • DDG on “Those who frequently express their love for the government and have led exemplary, flawless lives may have no reason to cower” brought up It’s Probably Much Worse Than You Think which I’m 99.9% certain is the article title. I haven’t found the full text, but there’s a fairly long excerpt here. I hope you can recover the whole thing – as the comment from Erwin Sea @ 8/13 11:23a indicates, clue-by-fours are sorely needed.

            WRT the OP, BTW, the article is every bit as good as the title.


            • ikdr,
              I found it. The article was “It’s Probably Much Worse Than You Think,” which was published June 10, 2013. I’ll put it up in the next day or two. I started archiving the pre-WordPress articles but it was time-consuming and tedious and few people were reading them. I thought devoting my efforts to turning out new stuff was a better use of my time, but the old articles are still accessible.


  2. I have absolutely no problem with google or NSA tracking. As far as I’m concerned we are not using the technology enough as it is. We virtually know nothing about the 320,000,000 people we have residing in the Unite States, not including the millions of visitors, visa over-stays and illegal aliens and that my friends is the mistake that’s going to get us killed. ” Gather On” and get smart people.


  3. Interesting enough when I have had trouble finding something (or I prefer to stay under the radar) I have used DDG. Amazing how much different and additional info comes available using DDG.

    Another fine article, Robert, that I intend to share.


    • Nancy,
      I checked out the CCTA website. That’s quite a site. It must take a lot of effort to maintain. Keep up the good work. It’s at the real grassroots, not the astroturf, where the battles get initiated, fought, and won!


  4. Pingback: SLL: The Goolag Echopeligo | Western Rifle Shooters Association

  5. Bob you’ve really gone and done it this time. Chastizing the feds can be overlooked for a while, but Google Demi Gods makes you too dangereous to be associated with, I’m deeply sorry but I must unfreind you to save my sterling reputation with Big Bro (did I mention I just love big bro) and Ducky Go Go. I do hope You’ll recant before it’s too late.
    Signed, Your Unfriend Crazy Uncle Fleabaggs who lives in the closet. So long ungrateful unfriend. What You said about how beautiful and sexy a good strong feminine woman is was just reprehensible.


  6. I find it a bit puzzling after all these years about folks that have had it with gaggle still knowingly use their products,been with the duck a long time,same with no rotten apples or dirty windows for me,we at the moment have lots of choices.

    I do realize sometimes hard to know who is behind some services one uses so research as best as you can.

    Suck book/gaggle/twaddle/tube ect. may not be completely brouht down unless all stop using em but certainly can take a bite out of their budgets easily.


  7. Don’t you see that the whole aim of( Googlespeak) is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.”
    h/t 1984 (Nineteen Eighty-Four)


  8. Pingback: The Goolag Echopeligo « Financial Survival Network

  9. I’m looking for DDG. See ya,Google. Dipshits


  10. Pingback: "The Goolag Echopeligo" |

  11. Pingback: “The Goolag Echopeligo” | Wall Street Karma

  12. Pingback: “The Goolag Echopeligo” – Earths Final Countdown

  13. Pingback: "The Goolag Echopeligo" | Zero Hedge - Stockmarket news - Forex - News - Realtime market Data- World News - Trading Ideas

  14. Pingback: "The Goolag Echopeligo" - Telzilla

  15. Pingback: “The Goolag Echopeligo” | ProTradingResearch

  16. Pingback: “The Goolag Echopeligo” – The Conservative Insider

  17. Pingback: "The Goolag Echopeligo" - Political American

  18. Pingback: "The Goolag Echopeligo" - Blog Pays | A truth of your life

  19. Pingback: “The Goolag Echopeligo” | Economic Crisis Report

  20. Pingback: “The Goolag Echopeligo” – Independent News Media

  21. Pingback: “The Goolag Echopeligo” | Black Swan Alert

  22. Pingback: "The Goolag Echopeligo" | StockTalk Journal

  23. Mr. Gore. I like your thought process here. Have you ever given any thought about government social policy over the past 55 or so years (EEO/diversity, welfare, busing, abortion, [overreaching] safety laws, etc.) meddling with economic and biological natural selection processes, the associated economic cost to our society, and the end social result (like this Google mindset and current events might be IT)? Do you think it’s possible we will learn the hard way that you can’t fool mother nature? Thank you.


    • You ask an excellent question. Kevin Myers asked the same question in an article, “On Africa,” that I recently posted. The key concern I have: do you want, through various transfer payments, to incentivize people to have children who demonstrably cannot even take care of themselves? I have the same concern about immigration: because America’s capacity and political willingness to allow in immigrants is not unlimited, don’t we want to let in those who demonstrably bring something to this country in terms of skills, education, and personal resources? Those are questions that don’t ordinarily get asked in polite, politically correct circles, but that just means they should be asked. Never underestimate the power of a question. Thanks for asking yours.


  24. Pingback: "The Goolag Echopeligo" - We Go Blog | Buzz

  25. is another great privacy-friendly alternative for Google, same results without tracking!


  26. Pingback: If Google and Facebook are not regulated, their politically-motivated censorship will drive America to open warfare in the streets – – Peter Degedo

  27. Pingback: If Google and Facebook are not regulated, their politically-motivated censorship will drive America to open warfare in the streets – | SAVIOR.NEWS

  28. Pingback: If Google and Facebook are not regulated, their politically-motivated censorship will drive America to open warfare in the streets | America's Final Days

  29. Pingback: Nerf shackles - Occurrences

  30. Pingback: Damore’s Revenge: Google Faces Growing Legal Threats As Other Googlers Come Forward, by Tyler Durden | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.