The War That Never Ends (for the U.S. Military High Command), by Danny Sjursen

If you’re in the military, even though US involvement in Vietnam ended in 1975, you have to try to make sense of that conflict, if only because there are similarities between that involvement and current conflicts. From Danny Sjursen at

Vietnam: it’s always there. Looming in the past, informing American futures.

A 50-year-old war, once labeled the longest in our history, is still alive and well and still being refought by one group of Americans: the military high command.  And almost half a century later, they’re still losing it and blaming others for doing so.

Of course, the U.S. military and Washington policymakers lost the war in Vietnam in the previous century and perhaps it’s well that they did.  The United States really had no business intervening in that anti-colonial civil war in the first place, supporting a South Vietnamese government of questionable legitimacy, and stifling promised nationwide elections on both sides of that country’s artificial border.  In doing so, Washington presented an easy villain for a North Vietnamese-backed National Liberation Front (NLF) insurgency, a group known to Americans in those years as the Vietcong.

More than two decades of involvement and, at the war’s peak, half a million American troops never altered the basic weakness of the U.S.-backed regime in Saigon.  Despite millions of Asian deaths and 58,000 American ones, South Vietnam’s military could not, in the end, hold the line without American support and finally collapsed under the weight of a conventional North Vietnamese invasion in April 1975.

There’s just one thing.  Though a majority of historians (known in academia as the “orthodox” school) subscribe to the basic contours of the above narrative, the vast majority of senior American military officers do not.  Instead, they’re still refighting the Vietnam War to a far cheerier outcome through the books they read, the scholarship they publish, and (most disturbingly) the policies they continue to pursue in the Greater Middle East.

The Big Re-Write

In 1986, future general, Iraq-Afghan War commander, and CIA director David Petraeus penned an article for the military journal Parameters that summarized his Princeton doctoral dissertation on the Vietnam War.  It was a piece commensurate with then-Major Petraeus’s impressive intellect, except for its disastrous conclusions on the lessons of that war.  Though he did observe that Vietnam had “cost the military dearly” and that “the frustrations of Vietnam are deeply etched in the minds of those who lead the services,” his real fear was that the war had left the military unprepared to wage what were then called “low-intensity conflicts” and are now known as counterinsurgencies.  His takeaway: what the country needed wasn’t less Vietnams but better-fought ones.  The next time, he concluded fatefully, the military should do a far better job of implementing counterinsurgency forces, equipment, tactics, and doctrine to win such wars.

To continue reading: The War That Never Ends (for the U.S. Military High Command)

One response to “The War That Never Ends (for the U.S. Military High Command), by Danny Sjursen

  1. The failure of the armchair strategists who learned the art of war in the wild and woolly faculty lounges is that wars are resolved by resolve. America was handicapped at home, by a treasonous group of defeatists aided by Communists who cheered the defeat of Saigon, much the same way as communists in the French parliament cheered the news of the surrender of the French at Dien Bien Phu.

    The author glosses over the 500,000 troops and 500 tanks provided by Moscow and Peking while the Democrats in Washington cut off all aid to Saigon 2 years before the offensive started.

    These same military giants are bound and determined to do all they can to aid the forces of darkness, witness Obama, Kerry Hildabeast, et al. Have you ever seen a Democrat who stood up to the forces of darkness rather than aided them?

    But rest assured, we are all made safer by the military warrior class nurtured at Yale, Havard, and ladies schools every where.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.