‘Monsanto’s History Is One Full of Vast Lies’, by Nils Klawitter

Nils Klawitter at Spiegel Online, spiegel.de, interviews Brent Wisner, the lawyer who won the recent $289 million verdict against Monsanto.

On Aug. 10, lawyer Brent Wisner, 34, scored a landmark verdict on behalf of his client, cancer patient Dewayne Johnson. A court in San Francisco ruled that Monsanto was guilty of concealing the potential health risks associated with its weed killer glyphosate, which is sold in the United States under the brand name Round Up. The jury ordered the company to pay $289 million in damages to the plaintiff, who had used Round Up at his job as a janitor for a school district. The court said Monsanto should have labeled the product’s possible dangers for consumers. Monsanto, which was recently acquired by German pharmaceuticals giant Bayer, has denied any link between the product and the disease.

Wisner spoke to DER SPIEGEL about the case in an interview.


DER SPIEGEL: Your law firm is widely considered to be on the side of consumers. You have targeted pharmaceutical companies and intractable airlines. When did you start taking a closer look at Monsanto?

Wisner: It’s kind of in my blood. Even my father was a bit skeptical of pesticides. He networked with farmers and became an activist against the whole chemical thing. Then, two-and-a-half years ago, I received a call from Teri McCall. She was the widow of a farmer who had died of cancer and who had worked for over 30 years with Monsanto products. That was the impetus for our investigation. This summer, Dewayne Johnson approached us as well.

DER SPIEGEL: The dangers of Monsanto products have been under discussion for decades. Why did a court only decide to address the issue now?

Wisner: There are several reasons. The most important was probably the classification by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organization. In early 2015, they evaluated glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans.” Monsanto’s CEO responded by calling it “junk science.” Before that, nobody had collected so much data and looked so deeply at the issue. That was a wake-up call.

Attorney Brent Wisner: "Monsanto executives don't care about their reputations at all."

AFP

Attorney Brent Wisner: “Monsanto executives don’t care about their reputations at all.”

DER SPIEGEL: How much does Monsanto have to do with the fact that a verdict was reached only now?

Wisner: A lot! Monsanto has an internal program called “Let Nothing Go.” The aim of this program is to attack scientists who are critical of Monsanto products. They go after people directly and discredit them. They also pay others to do so.

To continue reading: ‘Monsanto’s History Is One Full of Vast Lies’

Advertisements

3 responses to “‘Monsanto’s History Is One Full of Vast Lies’, by Nils Klawitter

  1. What I see is only a miniscule tip of the “iceberg”. What is being discussed is the effect of glyphosate on an individual by contact and inhalation. Ask a question. What effect may be occuring secondary to the chemical being absorbed by the plant (via the genetic modification of that plant to withstand exposure to a glyphasate, say corn, soybeans, sugar beets, peanuts, etc) when it is eaten by say a pregnant woman or a young developing child? Sugar, high fructose corn syrup, peanut butter and other commonly consumed foods will contain glyphosates. When did we start to see a very rapid rise in peanut allergies, autism and other maladies? There are other modifications that Monsanto made to the “genetically modified seeds” which could cause harm but has anyone looked into the above?

    Like

    • You ask some great questions. Particularly interesting is the connection between pesticides and the rise of various maladies. These have skyrocketed over the last few decades, which cries out for studies on not just pesticides but heavy metal exposures from vaccines and burning coal. Unfortunately, unbiased studies on all this are few and far between.

      Like

      • I believe you are grasping the issue but I might wonder about the issue of “coal” burning since that form of “pollution” has been around for a very long time and the incidence of at least two of the problems mentioned had not been evident over those earlier times. The two issues that I mentioned, 1) Peanut allergies and 2) Autism came about when the introduction of the GMO seeds became available. There would, actually, be a delay due to the fact that the population effected would have to take time to mature, to a degree. There has been a series of studies by the Pediatric interests that at least try to mitigate the issue of heavy metals role in some problems. I am not sure that the verdict is still out on that aspect of the problems.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.