If by definition vaccines are supposed to confer immunity, then Covid-19 “vaccines” don’t make the definition of vaccine. From off-guardian.org:
If the Covid19 shots “reduce symptoms”, but don’t prevent infection or transmission…are they truly “vaccines”?
“Vaccine” is a word a with a simple meaning. I’ll quote it to you, from the Oxford dictionary:
A substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.
And here, from the CDC’s website:
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.
Encyclopedia Brittanica says more or less the same. As does dictionary.com. Cambridge University. Merriam Webster.
You get the point.
A “vaccine” is substance that, when introduced into a body, “provides immunity” to a specific disease. This person, now immune, is therefore incapable of passing that disease on to others. This is the entire point of vaccination.
Reblogged this on Rangitikei Environmental Health Watch.
LikeLike