Tag Archives: Vaccine definition

“Vaccines” as Palliatives, by Eric Peters

Vaccines no longer have to confer immunity, they only have to “help protect” against  or alleviate some of the symptoms of a disease. By the new definition, aspirin is a vaccine. From Eric Peters at ericpetersautos.com:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Now that “vaccines” have been redefined as palliatives – they “help protect” rather than confer immunity – how long will it be before new “vaccines” are trotted out that “help protect” against all kinds of other things?

“Vaccines” that “help protect” against obesity, for instance. Childhood obesity having become a chronic “sickness.” What better – what more profitable – way to “help protect” against becoming overweight than by “vaccinating” kids for that, too?

Note that the “vaccines” – as they are styled, but aren’t – are gene therapy drugs. As in, they jigger with your genes – to “help protect” against (in this case) the effects of  the “virus.”

Note the italics – to emphasize that is what the pushers of these drugs say – and what is obediently parroted by the people not smart enough to understand what is being pushed. Or evil enough to participate in the pushing.

They no longer say that the “vaccines” confer immunity. Because, of course, they can’t. That would be like saying the sun going down at night lights up the night sky. Well, they can’t say that yet. But, give them time. If sex is fungible on say-so then so is everything else.

So – for now – they say that if you take the “vaccines” (plural, because they are so very effective) then you stand a lower chance of being hospitalized if you get the sickness these “vaccines” don’t prevent you from getting.

Continue reading→

CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is “Problematic”, by Techno Fog

If your deadly concoction doesn’t quite meet the definition of vaccine, change the definition. From Techno Fog at technofog.substack.com:

CDC: Problematic Vaccine? No, Problematic Definition of Vaccine.

Pic unrelated 🙂

The CDC caused an uproar in early September 2021, after it changed its definitions of “vaccination” and “vaccine.” For years, the CDC had set definitions for vaccination/vaccine that discussed immunity. This all changed on September 1, 2021.

The prior CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination (August 26, 2021):

Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.

Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.

The CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination since September 1, 2021:

Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.

Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.

People noticed. Representative Thomas Massie was among the first to discuss the change, noting the definition went from “immunity” to “protection”.

Twitter avatar for @RepThomasMassieThomas Massie @RepThomasMassie

Check out @CDCgov’s evolving definition of “vaccination.” They’ve been busy at the Ministry of Truth:

Image

To many observers, it appeared the CDC changed the definitions because of the waning effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. For example, the effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine falls over time, with an Israeli study reported in August 2021 as showing the vaccine being “only 16% effective against symptomatic infection for those individuals who had two doses of the shot back in January.”  The CDC recognizes the waning effectiveness, thus explaining their promotion of booster shots.

Continue reading→

New Normal Newspeak #2: “Vaccine”, from Off-Guardian

If by definition vaccines are supposed to confer immunity, then Covid-19 “vaccines” don’t make the definition of vaccine. From off-guardian.org:

If the Covid19 shots “reduce symptoms”, but don’t prevent infection or transmission…are they truly “vaccines”?

“Vaccine” is a word a with a simple meaning. I’ll quote it to you, from the Oxford dictionary:

A substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.

And here, from the CDC’s website:

Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.

Encyclopedia Brittanica says more or less the same. As does dictionary.com. Cambridge University. Merriam Webster.

You get the point.

A “vaccine” is substance that, when introduced into a body, “provides immunity” to a specific disease. This person, now immune, is therefore incapable of passing that disease on to others. This is the entire point of vaccination.

Continue reading→