Why have we doctors been silent? By Lucie Wilk

The doctors who have accepted government writ and propaganda about Covid-19 and its treatments have cost thousands of people’s lives. From Lucie Wilk at conservativewoman.co.uk:

AS an NHS hospital doctor, I have had a front-row seat as the drama of the coronavirus pandemic has unfolded. It has been a year and a half of confusion, frustration and anger for me as I’ve watched our profession drawn into complicity with what I anticipate will be regarded as one of the most egregious public health disasters in history.

I have watched as ‘the science’ has been presented on the national stage flanked by Union Jack flags as an unassailable truth. For something so apparently inviolable, it seems to shift and change disconcertingly from week to week, and for those of us looking beneath the pomp to the plain data, we see the rather unexciting (and unchanging) truth: the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, as it turns out, has a much lower infection fatality rate than early predictions. It is less deadly than the seasonal flu in children. The Office for National Statistics has reported the mean age of a Covid-attributed death in the UK to be 80.3 years, slightly older than deaths from other causes (78.2 years over the comparable time period).

What has been most upsetting for me has been the unquestioning compliance from the medical community as increasingly draconian, non-evidence-based and destructive virus control measures have been implemented. Some of the overt corruption, financial conflict of interests and politicisation has been laid bare in editorials in prominent medical journals such as the BMJ. But the vast majority of doctors have had no interest in asking questions or looking further.

My concern over our professional passivity turned to alarm as our compliance required us to support the roll-out of an experimental vaccine to a trusting population.

Continue reading→

5 responses to “Why have we doctors been silent? By Lucie Wilk

  1. This is an irresponsible, dangerous piece. The ‘facts’ have been tweaked to fit the narrative. The data is wholly, at best! This person is not qualified to share this, it is purely her opinion and is littered with inconsistencies and obvious bias.

    The GMC should be looking at this closely. Her credentials certainly aren’t adequate for any of us to take the opinions seriously. She uses her status as a rheumatologist consultant within the nhs, to fool the reader into believing that she is qualified to comment and she suggests that she speaks collectively for other NHS Doctors, she does not!

    To use a political platform is inappropriate.

    She has written one fictional storybook in the past and has presented to Ted Talks on ‘Art in medicine’. Neither of those activities qualify her as a serious medical journalist.

    The sharing of this narrative in the middle of a pandemic is dangerous and puts vulnerable people at great risk.

    I would be interested in hearing from those qualified within the field of virology as to their take on this ‘fit-for-the-bin’ nonsense piece.


  2. “Covid deaths lower than flu”!? sorry but thats absolutely untrue.

    Pneumonia from flu kills 11k a year. 150 000 people but more like 200 000 if you look at excess deaths have died since Covid started last January. Flu deaths in UK are avout 400 per year, but they get lumped in with pnuemonia stats.

    101 children died of Covid since last Jan. Not including the last 2 weeks. 33 died of flu in 2019. The provisional figures for last week from the ons (above) show a further 34 died of Covid last week. 11k children have long covid.

    The JCVI HAVE considered that allowing natural infection in
    children to run rife, they could act as a natural booster to older people.
    Not only is this contrary to their stated terms of reference (to not
    consider effect other than on the individual), but it also completely
    contradicts the other statement that ‘children
    do not catch the virus, do not get ill with it, and cannot pass it on to
    others’ (which in itself is rather contradicted by the facts which
    demonstrate rampant transmission in schools – It has been stated
    elsewhere that children do not pass it on to older people because they
    are smaller – but we all know a granny who picks them up and sits them
    on their laps and kisses them!)

    Further, it IS within JCVI’s remit to consider effects on others bedises
    the individual : it is obvious in their statements in the ‘Green Book’
    regarding need to maintain adequate levels of vaccination in the
    community to reach ‘herd immunity’ for certain viruses (before Covid)
    unless that has been removed recently, and it is covered in their
    considerations of HepB and TB immunisation (again, unless removeed
    Their advice also seems to be based on an underestimate, or lack of
    consideration of, the incidence of significant health effects of ‘wild’
    infection in children (and adults). And an over-emphasis on vaccine side
    effects (although the list of side effects in older people is certainly
    significant for something that gives such poor protection).
    Wild coronavirus infection can, and does, cause myocarditis,
    pericarditis, myositis and meningitis in adults and children, as do Flu,
    Paraflu, RSV, CMV, and Covid-19.
    And on the subject of herd immunity – how can we hope to reach herd
    immunity quickly to make society safe, if we refuse to allow children to
    be vaccinated? (although, I would like to see a much
    more effective vaccine with less side effects as fast as possible to do
    this with)

    There are some other lines to pick up on also :
    Funding for schools to install ventilation, increase classroom sizes and
    reduce class sizes was supposedly give out in late spring/early summer
    2020, and all schools apparently reached ‘covid-safe’ criteria as a
    result before the end of summer term, as a result. It now appears that
    this funding did NOT reach schools, and the ‘covid-safe’ announcement
    was severely ‘premature’ if not downright untrue, putting millions of
    children at risk!

    “At the time of writing, there have been more than 380,000 reports, 1.2million injuries and 1,700 fatalities submitted under the MHRA Yellow Card scheme.”

    Does the author, or anyone else for that matter, have any evidence for the above? Where does “1.2 million injuries” come from if there are only 380,000 reports?

    I could go on….


  3. Perhaps the govt stats might help – 168059 have died between the 2nd of January to the 2nd of July 2021 in England, either within 21 days of the first and second dose, and after 21 days of the first and second dose. Given at the time of writing it is now November, one may anticipate this figure being much higher. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland
    Or the waning immunity after receiving jabs: In the long term, people who get jabbed will be far more vulnerable to any mutations in the spike protein that might come along, even if they have already been infected and recovered once, or more than once. Page 24 of the report – link below.

    Click to access Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.