Experts who spoke with The Defender suggested One Health has more to do with a biosecurity agenda, a global surveillance system, vaccine passports and restrictions on human behavior than it has to do with protecting human health.
Brought to you by the same criminals who brought you the Covid response. From Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., at childrensheathdefense.org:
Editor’s note: This is part two of a two-part series on the One Health initiative. Read part one here.
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines “One Health,” as “an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems,” as they are “closely linked and interdependent” — a concept that on the surface appears to promote noble goals interlinking human and environmental health.
However, some scientists and medical experts are concerned about One Health’s vague goals. Arguing that the concept has been “hijacked,” they question the intent of those involved with the development and global rollout of the concept — including the WHO, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Bank.
Experts who spoke with The Defender also raised questions about other aspects of the One Health concept, including a biosecurity agenda, a global surveillance system, vaccine passports and restrictions on human behavior.
While these goals are underpinned by a vaguely defined “Theory of Change,” experts told The Defender that major financial interests are at the heart of the One Health agenda, which appears to be closely linked to climate change and sustainable development initiatives promoted by the same global organizations.
One Health objectives include a ‘global takeover of everything’
A biomedical police state CBCD bugs and pods control grid matrix?
But, but, but, I voted? (darr derp drool)
Hopefully my EBT card will charge up and how I wish it would buy muh weed, blunt wraps, lotto tickets, liquor.
Sheep get shorn, cattle head for the one way chute at the slaughterhouse.