Tag Archives: Macy’s

Macy’s Massacre – 3 Years Of Wasted Buybacks Ends Financial Engineering Dreams, by Tyler Durden

Maybe all those buybacks weren’t such a good idea after all. On a long enough time line, shareholder friendly can be very shareholder unfriendly, when cash is returned to shareholders and not reinvested in the business. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Macy’s is down over 13% today, pushing towards a sub-$40 handle – the lowest since February 2013 – after lowering guidance and disappointing a market full of hope (and hype) that retail is back (remember, all the retail hiring last Friday). However, that is not the most prescient issue as 3 years of buying back billions of dollars of Macy’s stocks – to financially-engineer earnings to ensure executive compensation is satisfactory – have been completely wasted. And worst still, the additional debt added to fund the total failure in timing of buybacks has now sent Macy’s credit spiking to multi-year highs (as the stock tumbles).

“No Brainer” – Macy’s actually increased their buyback pace last quarter alone – spending $900 million on stock at an average price of $53.89, a loss of $230 million of that “investment”

And the flipside of shareholder-friendly releveraging… spiking default risk…

Now what? This is the clear message that executives in every credit cycle – there is a limit to the largesse with which you can abuse bondholders in the name of levitating share prices amid a dismal reality.

To continue reading: Macy’s Massacre

See also: Macy’s Blames “Tepid Spending” On Revenue Miss: Same Store Sales Tumble; Slashes Guidance, by Tyler Durden, SLL, 11/11/15

Macy’s Blames “Tepid Spending” On Revenue Miss: Same Store Sales Tumble; Slashes Guidance, by Tyler Durden

Macy’s is generally considered one of the better retailers, and until July of this year its stock had had a fabulous run. However, its earning announcement today casts doubt on the health of the consumer sector, and it has been consumers, ever-willing to take on more debt, that has been supporting the economy. SLL predictions have been unhedged: we’re heading into a depression. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

The “unexpected” weakness among US consumption, that segment accountable for 70% of US GDP, continues this morning when moments ago Macy’s reported a trifecta of weak data, reporting a miss on Q3 sales which came at $5.87 billion below the $6.1 billion expected, and down from the $6.2 billion a year ago, but also a plunge in comparable store sales which tumbled by 3.9%, far worse than the expected drop of -0.4%, and nearly three times as bad as the 1.4% drop a year ago.

Cash flow plunged: cash provided by operating activities was $278 million in the first three quarters of 2015, compared with $841 million in the first three quarters of 2014.

Finally, M also slashed its full year same store guidance down from flat to -1.8% to -2.2% with sales projected to drop -2.7% to -3.1%, compared to a previous guidance of -1%, as contrary to the propaganda, the discretionary spending of the US consumer is bad and getting worse by the day.

Here is the company’s explanation for this debacle:

“We are disappointed that the pace of sales did not improve in the third quarter, as we had expected. Spending by domestic customers remained tepid, especially in key apparel and accessory categories. Simultaneously, the slowdown in buying by international visitors continued to significantly impact Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s stores in tourist centers, which are some of our company’s largest-volume and most profitable locations,” said Terry J. Lundgren, chairman and chief executive officer of Macy’s, Inc.

“Moving forward, we are accelerating steps needed to adapt in response to changing customer shopping preferences so we can restore our annual comparable sales growth on an owned plus licensed basis in the years ahead to the level of 2 percent to 3 percent while re-attaining an EBITDA rate as percent of sales of 14 percent. This includes building on our strength as a leading omnichannel innovator with consistent growth in online sales,” Lundgren said. “No other retailer has our track record of mastering change and creating shareholder value with a model of customer centricity. We have a deep and resourceful management team that is skilled in creating and executing successful strategies. Since the beginning of fiscal 2009, we have returned nearly $9 billion to shareholders. Our Total Shareholder Return has been 540 percent during that period, compared with a 121 percent increase in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.”

Any time a company starts touting its historical share return to justify a terrible quarter, run.