Tag Archives: Obamacare

It’s Tax-plicated: Complexity Rising with Obamacare Burden, by Douglass Kellogg

You know filing taxes is a pain in the ass, but did you know that aggregated for all taxpayers the time and money expense is estimated to be over $200 billion? Obamacare will only make it worse. From Douglass Kellog at the National Taxpayers Union Foundation, ntu.org:

This year’s new analysis of tax complexity from National Taxpayers Union Foundation (NTUF) found some startling lead figures: a $234 billion cost to the economy due to 6.1 billion lost hours of productivity and $32 billion spent out-of-pocket to comply with America’s insanely complicated tax system.

As always, there is much more to the story.

Since 2010, tax complexity costs have remained sky-high, at well over $200 billion each year. From fiscal year 2005 to 2013, the Treasury’s paperwork burden rose from 6.4 billion hours to 7 billion hours never making up less than 74 percent of the burden imposed by all government agencies combined.

While last year’s (covering 2013) totals actually trended downward compared to the previous year (2012), there was little reason to believe that was the beginning of a trend toward continued relief.

http://www.ntu.org/foundation/detail/its-tax-plicated-complexity-rising-with-obamacare-burden

To continue reading: Taxes

Obamacare flying machine begins a death spiral, by Sean Parnell

Reality is catching up to the pipe dream that is Obamacare. It has already fallen far short of the false promises that were made to sell it. Now it is running into its own inherent contradictions. From Sean Parnell, at washingtontimes.com:

The Supreme Court decision in King v. Burwell, the case challenging the Obama administration’s decision to award tax credits for health insurance sold through federally established exchanges, could turn on the question of whether a ruling that ends the tax credits on federal exchanges might cause something known as a “death spiral” in health insurance markets.

The good news is the answer is probably no, but the bad news is that’s only because the death spiral has probably already started.

A death spiral generally occurs when insurers are forced to raise premiums sharply to pay promised benefits. Higher premiums cause many of the healthiest policyholders, who already pay far more in premiums than they receive in benefits, to drop coverage.

When healthy policyholders drop coverage, it leaves the insurer with little choice but to raise premiums again because they now have a risk pool that is less healthy than before. But another premium increase means many of the healthy people who remained now drop their policies, too, and this continues until the only people willing to pay the now-very-high premiums are those with serious medical conditions.

The death spiral isn’t just a theory. Eight states learned this the hard way in the 1990s when they enacted two policies known as “community rating” and “guaranteed issue,” requiring health insurers to sell coverage to anyone who wanted it at the same price.

This quickly set off a death spiral because people knew they could wait until they were sick or injured to buy insurance, and premiums rose sky-high as healthy people exited the individual insurance market while the sick remained.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/26/susan-parnell-the-obamacare-death-spiral-may-have-/#ixzz3VsCMIo1s

To continue reading: Obamacare flying machine begins a death spiral

Obamacare Architects At Harvard Furious After Learning They Are Not Exempt From Obamacare, from Zero Hedge

This may be the funniest thing you’ll read all year, and the year is only 6 days old. From Zero Hedge:

The brain incubator at Harvard, the place which according to legend, and certainly the US News and World Report’s annual paid college infomercial, is the repository for some of the smartest people in the world, is furious.

The reason – Harvard’s illustrious faculty has learned that they too will be subject to their own policy recommendations as relates to Obamacare, which they themselves helped conceive. As the left-leaning NYT reported earlier today, “for years, Harvard’s experts on health economics and policy have advised presidents and Congress on how to provide health benefits to the nation at a reasonable cost. But those remedies will now be applied to the Harvard faculty, and the professors are in an uproar.”

Because Harvard’s brilliant ivory tower economists and public policy wonks know precisely how to fix the world… as long as said fix never applies to them.

For the rest of the Zero Hedge article: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-05/obamacare-architects-harvard-furious-after-learning-they-are-not-exempt-obamacare

For The New York Times’ story:  http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/06/us/health-care-fixes-backed-by-harvards-experts-now-roil-its-faculty.html?smid=tw-nytimes&_r=2

He Said That? 11/26/14

From Chuck Schumer, Democratic Senator from New York:

After passing the stimulus, Democrats should have continued to propose middle class-oriented programs and built on the partial success of the stimulus, but unfortunately Democrats blew the opportunity the American people gave them. We took their mandate and put all of our focus on the wrong problem – health care reform.

The plight of uninsured Americans and the hardships caused by unfair insurance company practices certainly needed to be addressed, but it wasn’t the change we were hired to make. Americans were crying out for an end to the recession, for better wages and more jobs; not for changes in their health care.

http://fusion.net/story/29934/chuck-schumer-plan-democrats-2016-election/

Senator Schumer also pointed out that only 5 percent of registered voters were uninsured in 2010. His remarks have infuriated Democrats, perhaps because the truth stings. Only the most blissfully oblivious of them do not realize that the lies used to sell Obamacare, the extraordinary and dubious maneuvering that were used to get it passed, the split along party lines, and the botched rollout have not been forgotten and motivated many to vote Republican earlier this month. Schumer sees the writing on the wall: with more of Obamacare to be rolled out in the next two years, in part because of Obama’s “amendments” to the law, it is an issue that is not going away, a gift that will keep on giving to the Republicans. Perhaps by acknowledging that perhaps it was not introduced at the most opportune time, politically savvy Schumer is trying to put some distance between himself and the unpopular program. He faces reelection in 2016, and while he has a presumably safe seat, one can never be too careful.

Health Care Law Recasts Insurers as Obama Allies, by Robert Pear

Look who’s become Best Friends Forever.

From Robert Pear, The New York Times, 11/17/14:

WASHINGTON — As Americans shop in the health insurance marketplace for a second year, President Obama is depending more than ever on the insurance companies that five years ago he accused of padding profits and canceling coverage for the sick.

Those same insurers have long viewed government as an unreliable business partner that imposed taxes, fees and countless regulations and had the power to cut payment rates and cap profit margins.

But since the Affordable Care Act was enacted in 2010, the relationship between the Obama administration and insurers has evolved into a powerful, mutually beneficial partnership that has been a boon to the nation’s largest private health plans and led to a profitable surge in their Medicaid enrollment.

The insurers in turn have provided crucial support to Mr. Obama in court battles over the health care law, including a case now before the Supreme Court challenging the federal subsidies paid to insurance companies on behalf of low- and moderate-income consumers. Last fall, a unit of one of the nation’s largest insurers, UnitedHealth Group, helped the administration repair the HealthCare.gov website after it crashed in the opening days of enrollment.

“Insurers and the government have developed a symbiotic relationship, nurtured by tens of billions of dollars that flow from the federal Treasury to insurers each year,” said Michael F. Cannon, director of health policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute.

So much so, in fact, that insurers may soon be on a collision course with the Republican majority in the new Congress. Insurers, often aligned with Republicans in the past, have built their business plans around the law and will strenuously resist Republican efforts to dismantle it. Since Mr. Obama signed the law, share prices for four of the major insurance companies — Aetna, Cigna, Humana and UnitedHealth — have more than doubled, while the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has increased about 70 percent. Continue reading

She Said That? 11/14/14

From family physician Dr. Holly Abernethy, who owns a private practice in Farmington, New Mexico, with three other doctors. She is turning away all newly eligible Medicaid beneficiaries because she cannot pay her practice’s expenses and maintain her income if the proportion of Medicaid patients grows beyond the current 13 percent. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Medicaid became the vehicle for covering about a third of nation’s uninsured, and reimbursements are capped.

“I would love to see every Medicaid patient that comes through my door,” Dr. Abernethy says. “If  you give people coverage, they should be able to utilize it.” But making it work would extend her workday, and “I have three small children and I miss them.” The Wall Street Journal, “More Join Medicaid, Straining Health Systems,” 11/14/14

Economics 101: if the demand for a good or service is increased (Obamacare and the increase in Medicaid patients), while the number of suppliers of that good or service stays the same or decreases (there are only so many hours in a doctor’s day, and many of them are planning on taking early retirement or have already done so), the price of that good or service must rise if supply is to equal demand. But of course, the first word of the ACA is “Affordable,” which means price controls and limited reimbursements, which means shortages. So yes, millions have received some sort of medical insurance under Obamacare, and perhaps its even affordable. Whether they receive any medical care is another question. Economics 101 suggests that many of them will suffer the same fate as patients in other nations, including Canada and Great Britain, that have nationalized or semi-nationalized health services: long waits for substandard medical care.

Finding An Obamacare Doctor Is Not As Easy As Advertised, from Human Events

Not to rub salt in still-raw wounds, but this story is a reminder that the penultimate step to completely socialized medicine has not come off as promised and advertised by its proponents.

From the Human Events website:

If the first two horsemen of the ObamaCare apocalypse were insurance cancellations and rate shock, the third is doc shock: the unpleasant discovery that your heavily subsidized ObamaCare plan doesn’t cover your old doctor, and finding a new one is tough, because some doctors don’t want ObamaCare patients. USA Today had more news on that subject Tuesday:

Now that many people finally have health insurance through the Affordable Care Act exchanges, some are running into a new problem: They can’t find a doctor who will take them as patients.
Because these exchange plans often have lower reimbursement rates, some doctors are limiting how many new patients they take with these policies, physician groups and other experts say.

“The exchanges have become very much like Medicaid,” says Andrew Kleinman, a plastic surgeon and president of the Medical Society of the State of New York. “Physicians who are in solo practices have to be careful to not take too many patients reimbursed at lower rates or they’re not going to be in business very long.”

There follows what seems like a bit of a dispute over how much ObamaCare plans reimburse doctors:

Kleinman says his members complain rates can be 50% lower than commercial plans. Cigna and Aetna, however, say they pay doctors the same whether the plan is sold on an ACA network or not. United Healthcare spokeswoman Tracey Lempner says it’s up to their physicians whether they want to be in the exchange plan networks, which have “rates that are above Medicaid.” Medicaid rates are typically below those for Medicare, which in turn are generally lower than commercial insurance plans.

To prevent discrimination against ACA policyholders, some insurance contracts require doctors to accept their exchange-plan patients along with those on commercial plans unless the doctors’ practices are so full they simply can’t treat any more people. But lower reimbursement rates make some physicians reluctant to sign on to some of these plans or accept too many of the patients once they are in the plans.

I suppose it’s possible Cigna and Aetna have more generous reimbursement policies than other providers, at least in New York, but the rest of the article makes it clear there is a real reluctance among doctors to get involved with these plans. There are also complaints that doctors are required to provide services to people during a 90-day grace period after their insurance plans are canceled, which can leave medical practices chasing patients and insurance companies around for payment, and the sudden appearance of the Second Horseman of the ObamaCare Apocalypse when consumers discover their gigantic ObamaCare out-of-pocket expenses mean they can’t afford to use the benefits from their subsidized insurance plans.

This has produced more of the unhappy campers you’re supposed to completely ignore while pretending ObamaCare is a success:

“I definitely feel like a bad person who is leeching off the system when I call the doctors’ offices,” she says.Shawn Smith of Seymour, Ind., spent about five months trying to find a primary care doctor on the network who would take her with a new, subsidized silver-level ACA insurance plan.

Last week, Smith found a practice that would accept her as a patient. Caroline Carney, chief medical officer of MDwise, Smith’s insurer, says some doctors “might be participating with us, but just not able to take on new patients. It’s at the doctor’s discretion.”

Jon Fougner, a recent Yale Law School graduate, sued Empire Blue Cross this month because he couldn’t find a primary care doctor in his new ACA exchange plan.

Fougner’s experience underscores how important it is for consumers to check out doctor and hospital networks for plans before they purchase them — and to call doctors to make sure they are accepting new patients with their policies.

Among 30 doctors he called, Fougner said, they either weren’t taking new patients, weren’t in the plan or didn’t return calls, or the contact information proved incorrect.

Continue reading