Here’s another article about the massive expansion of the government’s surveillance powers snuck in as a minor procedural change (see “Starting Tomorrow, Feds Can Hack Millions of Devices with One Warrant,” SLL). From Rick Falkvinge at privateinternetaccess.com:
Today December 1, the United States FBI is granted new powers to intrude into any computer anywhere on the globe, instantly changing the FBI from a random law enforcement agency to a global adversary. Law enforcement agencies are expected to be met with open arms and treated as good guys. There’s not going to be any good guy treatment of the FBI here, and for good reason.
The U.S. FBI has been sort of a random law enforcement agency somewhere on the planet doing physical law enforcement work, kind of like the Bundespolizei in Germany would appear to an American, or the way the Policía Federal Argentina would appear to a European. Today, the FBI becomes a global adversary and enemy to every security-conscious computer user and to every IT security professional, similar to how the mass surveillance agencies are treated. The FBI has requested, and been granted, the lawful power (in the US) to intrude into any computer in the entire world. In 95% of the world, this makes the FBI no different from a Russian or Chinese criminal intruder, and it will be treated in the same way by people defending their systems; defending their homes.
This has happened under the boring legislative name of “changes to Rule 41”, and is (as always!) presented as nothing of particular interest. This is an old trick: when you want sweeping broad new powers without accountability, don’t call it “sweeping broad new power without accountability”, but cloud it in a name so boring it will interest absolutely nobody. (This lawmaker trick was skillfully observed by John Oliver, who said we shouldn’t call the peer-to-peerness of the Internet a boring term like “net neutrality”, but the more to-the-point “preventing cable company fuckery”.)
These “changes to Rule 41” put a lot of people in the FBI’s crosshairs. As usual, most people think new powers for law enforcement can only target criminals – as in actual, violent criminals. This would be the reasonable course of action, but not so in this case, not so at all. Techdirt points out that anybody using encryption, or anybody trying to hide their identity or location, can be presumed to be engaged in crime (having a “guilty mind”, or mens rea in Legalese Latin) and therefore be a valid target.
To continue reading: Today, the FBI becomes the enemy of every computer user and every IT security professional worldwide
Pingback: Well, It’s Not Like They’re Busy With The HRC Email, Clinton Foundation, McAuliffe Election Loan, Or Refugee Racketeering Investigations… | Western Rifle Shooters Association
That’s the problem with government in general. Give them an inch and they think they’re rulers. Give the IRS the power to tax, and they take 1%, 5%, 10%, 25%….. No matter how much, it’s never enough. And now they selectively use their power for political purposes. Give the FBI the power to spy (because… terrorism) and soon everyone is a target of a tyrannical surveillance state. The only possible solution is strictly limited government. Unfortunately, our country was established on exactly that principle and has now failed, because there is no effective method to curtail that sort of absolute power over subjects. Either We the People are sovereign, or we’re not.
I couldn’t agree with you more.
ALL government agencies engage in mission creep. The FBI is among the worst as it engages in mission leaps. It will not stop until the domestic cold war goes hot.
Reblogged this on behindertvertriebentessarzblog.
Pingback: Daily Links | Waiting for the Barbarians