Pfizer lied about many aspects of its Covid-19 vaccine and its testing. That may be actionable fraud, which gets around Pfizer’s immunity from lawsuits like the Covid viruses get around Pfizer’s vaccines. From Sasha Latypova at sashalatypova at substack.com:
Evidence of Scientific and Regulatory Fraud
Note, an earlier version of this article was published by Doctors 4 Covid Ethics in 2022, with significant editorial contribution by Dr. Michael Palmer. This is a slightly revised and updated version.
The rushed “warp speed” development and approval of completely novel Covid-19 mRNA and DNA vaccines pushed on millions of people has resulted today in millions of reported injuries and deaths according to public health databases such as VAERS (US), Eduravigilance (EU), Yellow Card (UK) and others. In March 2022 a package of 466 pages of Pfizer non-clinical submission (animal studies) to the FDA was obtained by Judicial Watch via FOIA. This article is an updated version of my previously published review of these documents. The cursory nature of the entire preclinical program for mRNA injections conducted by Pfizer can be briefly summarized as “we did not find any safety signals because we did not look for them”. The omissions of standard safety studies and glaring scientific dishonesty in the studies that were performed are so obvious that they cannot be attributed to the incompetence of the manufacturers and regulators. Rather, the questions of fraud and willful negligence should be raised.
The focus of my review was the scope and adequacy of the program of non-clinical assessment for a novel gene therapy “vaccine” with a brief discussion of relevant regulatory frameworks. I did not dive deeply into the results of specific animal studies. My goal is to illustrate the complete breakdown of the previously known to be rigorous ethical drug development process, as well as the shocking negligence on the part of the regulatory agencies that are supposed to keep the pharmaceutical manufacturers honest. It turns out that both the regulators and the manufacturers were highly dishonest and pushed an entirely novel technology and product on millions of people without a single well designed toxicology assessment.
STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC 