Tag Archives: Chrysler

Chrysler Kaput, by Eric Peters

Has Fiat put the kiss of death on its Chrysler subsidiary? From Eric Peters, on a guest post at theburningplatform.com:

Fiat has put a hit out on Chrysler. Kissed both cheeks – then one right on the lips.

Tonight, you sleep with the fishes.

Well, maybe not tonight.

But about three years from now.

2020.

It will be that long – at least – until Fiat commits any cash to a major redesign of Chrysler’s aging rear-drive 300 sedan.

Two “sources” within the Italian automotive combine told the trade publication Automotive News this evil news – sotto voce – last week.

See here.

Which means the same evil news for Dodge’s also aging Charger sedan and Challenger coupe.

Which is really bad news, because all share a common “platform” – the industry-speak term for a chassis/frame. All three received their last major update back in 2011 – already six years in the rearview. By 2020, they will have been basically the same car for nearly 10 years.

Which means, they probably aren’t going to be updated. Which means it is likely they are going to be cancelled.

No car company leaves a car to rot on the vine like this unless they’ve already decided there is no future for that car.

In which case, there appears to be no future for Chrysler.

As of 2017, it has just two models to offer buyers and only of them – the Pacifica minivan – is remotely new. The 200 sedan has already been “hit” – cancelled prematurely after less than three years on the market (and despite selling well; see here for more about that).

Which leaves the 300.

It’s a death sentence for Chrysler.

Almost nothing to sell – and what they have to sell is nothing new. Not next year. Not the year after that. Or the next year.

By which time, you should be able to get a really good deal on a “new” 2018 Chrysler 300 or Dodge Charger or Challenger.

But why?

These are not unpopular cars. Of course, the same was true of the 200. But the 300 and Charger and Challenger are the only cars still available with rear-wheel-drive and V8 power at a price point average Americans can afford.

And there you have your answer.

It’s not Fiat that’s putting the cement shoes on Chrysler.

It’s Uncle.

The “contract” being the federal government’s Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE) mandates.

These are set to go up to a demented 50-plus MPG – unless Trump intervenes – by model year 2025. And the only way V8 (and V6) powered large sedans and coupes like the 300, Charger and Challenger are going to come within tire iron-throwing distance of 50-something MPG is by riding on a flatbed.

One powered by a Prius.

It’s not surprising that Fiat – a predominantly European cartel that specializes in tiny, high-economy cars, isn’t going to commit the funds to extend the production run of big, not-so-economical cars which will drag its overall CAFE numbers down like seawater did the Titanic. Plus they will be a hard sell to average Americans on account of the “gas guzzer” fines EPA will hit the company with, which will be tacked onto the sticker price of the offending vehicles. Which means they’d sell fewer.

This will cost Fiat money.

Which matters to a car company.

To continue reading: Chrysler Kaput

Home 470,000 Vehicles At Risk After Hackers “Take Control & Crash” Jeep Cherokee From A Sofa 10 Miles Away, by Tyler Durden

The original article comes from Andy Greenberg at wired.com. It is a lengthy, fascinating, and disturbing look at hacking modern automobiles, which the article says carmakers are doing their best to turn into a smartphone. Here is the link to Greenberg’s article on wired.com:

http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/

And here is a much shorter article with excerpts from the wired.com feature, from Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

In what is being called “the first of its kind,” Wired.com reports that hackers, using just a laptop and mobile phone, accessed a Jeep Cherokee’s on-board systems (via its wireless internet connection), took control and crashed the car into a ditch from 10 miles away sitting on their sofa. As The Telegraph details, the breach was revealed by security researchers Charlie Miller, a former staffer at the NSA, and Chris Valasek, who warned that more than 470,000 cars made by Fiat Chrysler could be at risk of being attacked by similar means. Coming just weeks after the FBI claimed a US hacker took control of a passenger jet he was on in the first known such incident of its kind, the incident shows just how vulnerable we are to modern technology.

As The Telegraph reports, the hackers (security experts) worked with Andy Greenberg, a writer with tech website Wired.com, who drove the Jeep Cherokee on public roads in St Louis, Missouri…

In his disturbing account Greenberg described how the air vents started blasting out cold air and the radio came on full blast when the hack began.

The windscreen wipers turned on with wiper fluid, blurring the glass, and a picture of the two hackers appeared on the car’s digital display to signify they had gained access.

Greenberg said that the hackers then slowed the car to a halt just as he was getting on the highway, causing a tailback behind him – though it got worse after that.

He wrote: ‘The most disturbing maneuver came when they cut the Jeep’s brakes, leaving me frantically pumping the pedal as the 2-ton SUV slid uncontrollably into a ditch.

‘The researchers say they’re working on perfecting their steering control – for now they can only hijack the wheel when the Jeep is in reverse.

‘Their hack enables surveillance too: They can track a targeted Jeep’s GPS coordinates, measure its speed, and even drop pins on a map to trace its route.’

The hack was possible thanks to Uconnect, the Internet connected computer feature that has been installed in fleets of Fiat Chrysler cars since late 2013.

It controls the entertainment system, deals with navigation and allows phone calls.

The feature also allows owners to start the car remotely, flash the headlights using an app and unlock doors.

But according to Miller and Valasek, the on-board Internet connection is a ‘super nice vulnerability’ for hackers.

All they have to do is work out the car’s IP address and know how to break into its systems and they can take control.

In a statement to Wired.com Fiat Chrysler said:

“Under no circumstances does FCA condone or believe it’s appropriate to disclose ‘how-to information’ that would potentially encourage, or help enable hackers to gain unauthorised and unlawful access to vehicle systems.

‘We appreciate the contributions of cybersecurity advocates to augment the industry’s understanding of potential vulnerabilities. However, we caution advocates that in the pursuit of improved public safety they not, in fact, compromise public safety.”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-07-21/470000-vehicles-risk-after-hackers-take-control-crash-jeep-cherokee-sofa-10-miles-aw