Oil Ushers in the Depression, by Robert Gore

The mathematics of debt growth in excess of underlying economic growth are inescapable. Taken to its logical extreme, every asset would be collateralized and debt service would stifle economic activity. Before that point is reached, however, debt becomes an unbearable economic burden—its costs exceed its benefits—which throws debt formation into reverse. The reversal in a system whereby fiat money, governmental borrowing, and central banking have divorced debt growth from the real economy is swift, dramatic, and inevitably contractive and deflationary. (Straight Line Logic, “A Skyscraper of Cards,” 10/19/14)

When “magic” economic nostrums can no longer keep an economy running in place, it falls backwards, painfully. In “non-magic” economics, debt growth well in excess of economic growth for an extended period, rising taxes, and increased regulatory sand in the gears and government rent-seeking eventually produces an economy that not only stops growing, but contracts. Almost immediately, debt in the most leveraged sectors of the economy starts unravelling, and in a debt-saturated economy that unravelling spreads quickly, because virtually every financial asset is someone else’s debt (or equity, which occupies an even lower rung on the priority-of-payback ladder). In 2008, it started with mortgages and mortgage-backed securities and engulfed the world’s financial system with frightening speed. (Straight Line Logic, “The Economics of Debt, Deterioration, Deflation, Depression, and Disorder,” 11/17/14)

The future is now. The carnage in the oil sector, where a glut has knocked over a third off its price in less than five months, is not an aberration, but a harbinger—the shape of things to come across sectors and around the world. It kicks off the depression, or more accurately, the resumption of the depression that started in either 2000 or 2007 (let the statisticians quibble about that determination).

The oil industry is a perfect example of the analyses in the two articles cited above. The only wrinkle is that so many of the major participants are governments, but that does not change the conclusion. All of the oil-producing nations’ governments had assumed a much higher oil price, and budgeted accordingly. Of those governments, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states have the lowest costs of production. Even at the current price, their production is break-even or profitable, but their total revenues are falling far short of budget projections. For other nations, the situation is much more dire. Not only are revenues coming up short, but they are losing money with every barrel they pump; their costs of production are higher than the current price.

Their spending plans are an implicit lien on their future oil production. That is in addition to their explicit liens; many of the governments have incurred heavy debts. The plunging price of oil is a margin call, and the governments have no choice but to curtail spending, raise taxes, and sell assets, which in many cases means selling more oil for the cash flow—even if it results in economic loss—adding to the glut. Next up: debt defaults. Eventually uneconomic oil production will have to stop, adding to unemployment and economic contraction.

Venezuela, a major oil producer, is on the cutting edge. Social spending has been the only thing keeping President Nicolas Maduro in power. However, things have gotten so bad that he recently had to seek an emergency loan from China. Venezuela is burning through its foreign exchange reserves and when the Chinese loan is gone, default on foreign-currency-denominated debt will be inevitable. On Bolivar-denominated debt, Maduro will further crank up the printing presses to inflate away the liability. Inflation, already running at more than 60 percent per annum, will skyrocket. The situation is not quite as grim in other large oil-producing nations, including Russian, Mexico, and Nigeria, but without a quick recovery in the price of oil (a low-odds bet), they will soon be sharing Venezuela’s pain.

In the US, it is a matter of debate concerning the break-even price for oil production in various producing areas, and how leveraged producers are. However, some of them are losing money at sub-$70 per barrel oil, and cheap money and compressed credit spreads have led some of them to take on too much debt. So the US oil industry, lately touted as the greatest American economic miracle since Silicon Valley, is sharing the pain, too, as a glance at oil company stock and bond price charts the last few months will confirm. Even Silicon Valley has its ups and downs.

If, as the media keep repeating, the oil price drop is a “tax cut” in the US, we should get ready for more such tax cuts as the price of many goods and services falls. The oil industry is a large enough component of the global economy that its looming contraction, coupled with weakening economies (some are already in recession) throughout the developed and developing world, should get the snowball rolling on the debt contraction-deflation-depression progression mentioned above. Unfortunately, our tax cuts are going to be pretty puny compared to the costs of rising unemployment, widespread defaults, falling asset prices, and contracting economies.

Batten down the hatches.

A HISTORICAL NOVEL THAT’S A PERFECT ANTIDOTE TO TODAY’S BLEAK SCENE, AND A PERFECT HOLIDAY GIFT!!!

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK

23 responses to “Oil Ushers in the Depression, by Robert Gore

  1. Pingback: Oil Ushers In The Depression | Western Rifle Shooters Association

  2. My econ prof always warned that deflation was a far greater threat to the (inter-)national economy than inflation, and this could well be the deflating bubble he warned about. Got brass?

    Like

  3. Scott Ulster: If a depression was such a bad thing then explain IT. The IT producers and consumers of product are always in a depression state as the price of the product generally FALLS over its production life irrespective of depreciation concerns. If that is treated as an asset base then that is truly a deflationary outcome yet IT spending has increased year on year for nearly 40 years and ongoing and that deflationary price curve is generally viewed as a positive outcome.

    Like

  4. I have read reports that even at $50/bbl the ND Bakken and W TX fields are still profitable at delivered price to the refinery. That the margins are being squeezed in the global market there is no doubt. But I have my doubts if this will lead to a wholesale depression. As this chart shows — http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PETR.RT.ZS — components of the global market are not treating all countries equally in respect to margins. A global level depression may not be in the cards as a result.

    The other thing to keep in mind is at best we are returning to a year 2000 pricing base. See — http://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/ASB2013.pdf — graph 2.5. What the article intones is that the household lived high on the hog when the commissions were fat and now are going to default when the commissions are lean. That would only be true is the household ran up are large bundle of fixed debt that cannot now be serviced. As the world bank data indicates that may not be so everywhere in the global markets and certainly would not be the case for most of the US players.

    Just some thoughts.

    Like

  5. drdog09 is generaly correct, the absolute BE level varies company to company within large producing areas. Further, lifting costs, the variable cost of actually producing oil is only a portion of the total BE costs which include a per barrel amortization of all the finding, drilling, lease costs, etc, so, if net back price remains above variable cost, production goes on. What has already happened is that new drilling slows, October saw a 15% decline in drilling permit applications in what are commonly referred to a shale areas.

    Like

  6. Pingback: Over 20 national governments to be overthrown as cabal take-down begins, CIA sources say | I am a Malaysian

  7. Pingback: Oil Economics, Part 2, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  8. Pingback: Bloomberg Connects the First Two Dots! | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  9. Pingback: A Mania of Manias, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  10. Pingback: Be Prepared, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  11. Pingback: “Default Monday”: Oil & Gas Companies Face Their Creditors, by Wolf Richter | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  12. Pingback: Crisis Progress Report (6): Prophets Without Honor, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  13. Pingback: The Recesssion is Here, Prelude to Depression, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  14. Pingback: He Said That? 6/2/15 | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  15. Pingback: Crisis Progress Report (8)–Acceleration, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  16. Pingback: The Facade Crumbles, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  17. Pingback: Crisis Progress Report (9): Landfall, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  18. Pingback: He Said That? 8/21/15 | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  19. Pingback: Blood, Oil, Debt, and Government, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  20. Pingback: Global Oil Inventory Glut Biggest In Last Decade, by Grant Smith | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  21. Pingback: Crisis Progress Report (14): Global Margin Call | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  22. Pingback: Back To Reality, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  23. Pingback: The Apple Will Drop, by Robert Gore | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

Leave a Reply to jpintx Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.