Rigged, by Robert Gore

One truth the best and the brightest of our founding fathers knew in their bones: government would always be the preeminent threat to individual security, prosperity, liberty, and happiness. Strip away the irrelevant dross and history boiled down to one theme: the individual versus the state. Government, an institution gestated in fear of violence, inevitably uses the violent power that it has either wrested for itself or has been granted against its supposed beneficiaries.

The founders knew that human nature never changes, that those in control of a government would inevitably be corrupted by their power and employ it to their own design and advantage. Their solution was enumerated powers, an overlapping separation of those powers, a myriad of procedural encumbrances, the Bill of Rights, federalism, and limits on the government’s abilities to tax, raise armies, and wage war. The idea was to make it harder for this new government to do what governments had done throughout history. They had to have realized that any effort to constrain a government ultimately depended on the wisdom and virtue of those in power. Wisdom and virtue in perpetually short supply, they also had to have realized that their effort would eventually fail.

And fail it has. Donald Trump is making more waves by charging that the electoral system is “rigged,” and for refusing to pledge that he will not challenge the official results of the election. Our entire government is massively rigged, an agglomeration of scams, testament to terminal philosophical deterioration and default. Its partners in crime have reacted vehemently against even the suggestion that the election could be rigged. Their fear: once discussion is allowed about rigged elections, people may take umbrage at all the other scams and actually do something about them.

prime-deceit-final-cover

PRIME DECEIT

ROBERT GORE’S SCATHING SATIRE

TAKES AIM AT POWER, CORRUPTION,

WAR, AND OTHER IDIOCIES!

click here For details

OF A SPECIAL OFFER

FOR SLL READERS!

The greatest of those scams is robbing whatever productive Peters remain out there to pay the burgeoning number of welfare and warfare state Pauls. With passage of the Sixteenth Amendment in 1913, the scammers acquired the power to extract unlimited wealth from the productive populace that had so long resisted the income taxes. By far the most effective way to commit a crime is to make it the law of the land.

Once you can legally steal someone else’s honestly earned money for the enrichment of yourself or your designated beneficiaries, everything else is a sub-grift. One of which is money itself. In that same unfortunate year of 1913, the US established its central bank, the Federal Reserve. Nixon’s abandonment of the gold window in 1971 marked the last time that the dollar was anything more than a fiat debt unit conjured by the Fed. The Fed’s debt monetization, interest rate suppression, depreciation of the currency, and the resulting inflation tax all have redounded to the benefit of the government. The Fed also has been the agent within government and finance for the interests of the banks it de jure regulates and has de facto cartelized.

Regulation, speaking of sub-grifts, is undoubtedly one of the most lucrative. Once the reformers who bestow a regulatory contraption on the polity move on to the next cause, the regulated quickly turn it to their own advantage. Adapting to costly and cumbersome regulations confers a competitive advantage to entrenched firms with large legal and compliance departments. With a suitable investment in lobbyists and gratuities, those supposedly disinterested bureaucrats acting in the “public interest” will draft obscure codicils of obscure regulations of obscure laws that magically help one firm and magically cripple its competition. Nobody among the 330 million plus members of the public who pay no attention to the Federal Register is any the wiser. A variation of regulatory arbitrage is tax code arbitrage, in which the well-heeled and their political patrons insert presents to themselves in seldom-visited interstices of the IRS’s voluminous diktats.

The government is a racket, pure and simple, and many Americans, and all the sentient ones, know it. In its vastness no one can grasp all the details, but that vastness also means it’s too big to hide. Trillions go in; trillions go out; lobbyists lobby; donations are made; bribes are taken; laws are passed; regulations are promulgated; Washington grows ever more wealthy and powerful; the connected grow ever more arrogant and hypocritical; everyone else falls farther behind. The media obsequiously cheers Washington and its connected and jeers at the left behind.

Every time Donald Trump tells an obvious truth the racketeers go apoplectic. He has expressed a fear that the upcoming election might be rigged. In the third debate he would not state unconditionally that he will accept the result. The fusillade of condemnation plumbs new depths of media inanity. If Trump thinks the election may be rigged, why would he swear to honor the result regardless? If the racketeers are indeed planning to rig the election, Trump’s ability to challenge the result by calling for recounts or filing suit is the only way he has of either keeping the other side honest (or less dishonest) before and during the election, or calling it to account afterwards. Pledging to forego the only leverage he has to prevent or expose election fraud would be unilateral surrender. Trump understands leverage. And he doesn’t surrender.

There is a possibility that he might expose and upend various rackets if he was elected president, versus the absolute certainty that his opponent won’t. He declared all-out war during a scathing Al E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner routine, the day after the debate. With the kind of money and power that’s at stake, does anybody really believe that irredeemably corrupt racketeers are above tampering with or outright fixing an election? Given their lock on government, does anybody really believe they don’t have the ability to do so? Motive and means are two key elements in any crime and America’s presidential elections aren’t exactly unsullied. Many Republicans maintain that vote fraud gave Kennedy Illinois and the election in 1960. Many Democrats maintain that vote fraud gave Bush Florida and the election in 2000

One can measure the validity of Trump’s utterances by the volume of squeals emanating from the pigs he’s stuck. Judging from the deafening din on this one, Trump scored a bullseye. Fair elections can withstand questions and scrutiny, it’s the rigged ones that can’t. If America’s faith in its elections is undermined, as so many hysterically hyperventilating hypocrites claim, it won’t be because of anything Donald Trump says or does, but because the racketeers rig elections and not all the people stay fooled all the time.

PRIME HISTORICAL FICTION

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK

22 responses to “Rigged, by Robert Gore

  1. Great article by putting Trump’s-the vote-is-rigged into the much larger context of the leviathon destroying our country.

    Like

  2. Senatssekretär Freistaat Danzig

    Reblogged this on behindertvertriebentessarzblog.

    Like

  3. frank w. hooper

    In spite of the seriousness of it all I’m really enjoying all the shrieks, moans and squeals coming from all directions. In addition, the PC culture and social justice snowflakes are getting clobbered. They all could teach a pig how to squeal.

    Like

  4. Pingback: Donald’s Right – The System Is Rigged, by Bill Bonner | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

  5. “Government, an institution gestated in fear of violence . . . ”
    In the sense you (I believe) mean, not exactly. See Franz Oppenheimer, The State.

    “The founders knew . . . those in control of a government would inevitably be corrupted by their power . . . They had to have realized that any effort to constrain a government ultimately depended on the wisdom and virtue of those in power.”
    I suspect that most, if not all of them didn’t realize what Orwell knew, namely that for some, power is for power’s sake. That there are thousands of such types, would-be Neros who live only for imposing their will upon others by force, for every one Cincinnatus who sincerely desires to exercise power solely for the purpose of maintaining a just and peaceful social order and longs for nothing so much as to drop the reins and return to his honest freehold. That the former, by sheer weight of numbers, regardless of any procedural / constitutional safeguards, will eventually overwhelm the latter. In short, the problem is not so much that power corrupts as that power inexorably draws the corrupt.

    “Once the reformers who bestow a regulatory contraption on the polity move on to the next cause, the regulated quickly turn it to their own advantage.”
    If this isn’t the best statement against government regulation ever written in 30 words or less, it’s definitely on the shortlist.

    “. . . members of the public who pay no attention to the Federal Register . . .”
    I wonder what percentage of the public even knows what ‘Federal Register’ means. I wouldn’t bet five cents that it’s more than low single digit.

    “The government is a racket . . .”
    Stefan Molyneux has a very interesting take on the fundamental nature of that racket. It can be found, in both video and text form, by searching on the author plus the title: The Story of Your Enslavement.

    “There is a possibility that [Trump] might expose and upend various rackets if he was elected president, versus the absolute certainty that his opponent won’t.”
    A sentiment often expressed, rarely so well. Also, the worst thing that he’s done politically, so far as I know, is exploit eminent domain for his personal benefit. While that certainly isn’t trivial, compared to his opponent, it’s like shoplifting versus first-degree murder.

    “One can measure the validity of Trump’s utterances by the volume of squeals emanating from the pigs he’s stuck.”
    If one judges a man by the quality of his enemies – a not unreasonable metric – I have to say my opinion of him has been rising with the volume of squeals.

    Like

  6. I enjoy your commentary on my commentary.

    Like

  7. Reblogged this on The way I see things … and commented:
    Check out Robert’s New book!
    ——-

    Every time Donald Trump tells an obvious truth the racketeers go apoplectic. He has expressed a fear that the upcoming election might be rigged. In the third debate he would not state unconditionally that he will accept the result. The fusillade of condemnation plumbs new depths of media inanity. If Trump thinks the election may be rigged, why would he swear to honor the result regardless? If the racketeers are indeed planning to rig the election, Trump’s ability to challenge the result by calling for recounts or filing suit is the only way he has of either keeping the other side honest (or less dishonest) before and during the election, or calling it to account afterwards. Pledging to forego the only leverage he has to prevent or expose election fraud would be unilateral surrender. Trump understands leverage. And he doesn’t surrender.

    There is a possibility that he might expose and upend various rackets if he was elected president, versus the absolute certainty that his opponent won’t. He declared all-out war during a scathing Al E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner routine, the day after the debate. With the kind of money and power that’s at stake, does anybody really believe that irredeemably corrupt racketeers are above tampering with or outright fixing an election? Given their lock on government, does anybody really believe they don’t have the ability to do so? Motive and means are two key elements in any crime and America’s presidential elections aren’t exactly unsullied. Many Republicans maintain that vote fraud gave Kennedy Illinois and the election in 1960. Many Democrats maintain that vote fraud gave Bush Florida and the election in 2000

    One can measure the validity of Trump’s utterances by the volume of squeals emanating from the pigs he’s stuck. Judging from the deafening din on this one, Trump scored a bullseye. Fair elections can withstand questions and scrutiny, it’s the rigged ones that can’t. If America’s faith in its elections is undermined, as so many hysterically hyperventilating hypocrites claim, it won’t be because of anything Donald Trump says or does, but because the racketeers rig elections and not all the people stay fooled all the time.

    Like

  8. It’s going to be ugly, no matter what. At least, the right people are shrieking for a change.

    I emailed this to Maine Patriots (TP), as well.

    Like

  9. Pingback: Trump "Truthers" Versus Hillary's "Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites" | Earths Final Countdown

  10. Pingback: Trump "Truthers" Versus Hillary's "Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites" | Zero Hedge

  11. Pingback: Trump “Truthers” Versus Hillary’s “Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites” | NewZSentinel

  12. Pingback: Trump "Truthers" Versus Hillary's "Hysterically Hyperventilating

  13. Pingback: Trump "Truthers" Versus Hillary's "Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites" | BlogFactory

  14. Pingback: Trump "Truthers" Versus Hillary's "Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites" | | Investing Matters

  15. Pingback: Trump “Truthers” Versus Hillary’s “Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites” | StrikeEngine

  16. Pingback: Trump “Truthers” Versus Hillary’s “Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites”Alternative News Network | Alternative News Network

  17. Pingback: Trump "Truthers" Versus Hillary's "Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites" | Timber Exec

  18. Pingback: Trump “Truthers” Versus Hillary’s “Hysterically Hyperventilating Hypocrites” | Political American

  19. Pingback: Daily Reading #14 | thinkpatriot

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.