The Leakers Who Exposed Gen. Flynn’s Lie Committed Serious — and Wholly Justified — Felonies, by Glenn Greenwald

Although he made  a name for himself helping Edward Snowden reveal government surveillance, Glenn Greenwald is not at all bothered that Michael Flynn’s phone calls with a Russian diplomat was intercepted, nor that they were leaked to the press for political ends. Greenwald’s position apparently is that all government leaks are good leaks, regardless of the motivations of the leakers. A question for Greenwald: if an intelligence agency had monitored Edward Snowden’s phone calls before he left the US, leaked to the press a conversation in which Snowden disclosed his plans, and thus thwarted Snowden’s planned disclosure and escape, and probably put him in jail, would that be a good leak? Motives matter in these cases, and Greenwald’s argument is weak; he’s trying to excuse both the intercepted calls and the leaks. From Greenwald at

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S NATIONAL security adviser, Gen. Michael Flynn, was forced to resign on Monday night as a result of getting caught lying about whether he discussed sanctions in a December telephone call with a Russian diplomat. The only reason the public learned about Flynn’s lie is because someone inside the U.S. government violated the criminal law by leaking the contents of Flynn’s intercepted communications.

In the spectrum of crimes involving the leaking of classified information, publicly revealing the contents of SIGINT — signals intelligence — is one of the most serious felonies. Journalists (and all other nongovernmental citizens) can be prosecuted under federal law for disclosing classified information only under the narrowest circumstances; reflecting how serious SIGINT is considered to be, one of those circumstances includes leaking the contents of intercepted communications, as defined this way by 18 § 798 of the U.S. Code:

Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates … or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes … any classified information … obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

That Flynn lied about what he said to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak was first revealed by Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who has built his career on repeating what his CIA sources tell him. In his January 12 column, Ignatius wrote: “According to a senior U.S. government official, Flynn phoned Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29, the day the Obama administration announced the expulsion of 35 Russian officials as well as other measures in retaliation for the hacking.”

That “senior U.S. government official” committed a serious felony by leaking to Ignatius the communication activities of Flynn. Similar and even more extreme crimes were committed by what the Washington Post called “nine current and former officials, who were in senior positions at multiple agencies at the time of the calls,” who told the paper for its February 9 article that “Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country’s ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials.” The New York Times, also citing anonymous U.S. officials, provided even more details about the contents of Flynn’s telephone calls.

To continue reading: The Leakers Who Exposed Gen. Flynn’s Lie Committed Serious — and Wholly Justified — Felonies


2 responses to “The Leakers Who Exposed Gen. Flynn’s Lie Committed Serious — and Wholly Justified — Felonies, by Glenn Greenwald

  1. Bob:

    I chose NOT to read Greenwald’s article. Greenwald, much like Assange, represent an inconsistent and contradictory position with respect to not only their political values, but their moral ones as well.

    While I certainly do not advocate the obscenity that “the ends justify the means,” one’s purposes and GOALS do matter! Both of these proponents of leaks advocate them in pursuit of entirely different objectives than do those of us who advocate them in the goal of returning to our heritage of individual rights as cited, for example, in the Bill of Rights.

    They do so for ideals best described under the tyrannical catechism of “social justice.”

    Such is but one result of our potentially fatal, “Educational Industrial Complex.”



  2. Pingback: Greenwald: Empowering the “Deep State” to Undermine Trump is Prescription for Destroying Democracy, by Nermeen Shaikh and Glenn Greenwald | STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.