High-profile journalists are not allowed to stray from the Democratic party line. From Matt Taibbi at taibbi.substack.com:

“The irony,” Greenwald says, “is that a media outlet I co-founded, and which was built on my name and my accomplishments, with the purpose of guaranteeing editorial independence, is now censoring me in the most egregious way — about the leading presidential candidate, a week before the election.”
Greenwald becomes the latest high-profile journalist to leave a well-known legacy media organization to join Substack. You’ll be able to read the piece rebuffed by The Intercept at his new site here.
In a nutshell, the fatal sequence of events went as follows:
Greenwald, after commenting pointedly about the reaction by press and Democratic Party officials to the New York Post story, reached out to Intercept editor Betsy Reed to float the idea of writing on the subject.
The first hint of trouble came when Reed suggested that yes, it might be a story, if proven correct, but “even if it did represent something untoward about Biden,” that would “represent a tiny fraction of the sleaze and lies Trump and his cronies are oozing in every day.”
Reblogged this on Citizens.
LikeLike
We need a circuit breaker between journalists and spy agencies.
LikeLike
There is one, it’s called integrity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unperson: A Life Destroyed, by Dennis Lehane an award winning Irish journalist who refused to work for MI 5 and the CIA. They smeared him with allegations he was an alcoholic and rapist and he was committed to a mental asylum. A warning to others who refuse?
LikeLike