Tag Archives: Oil

For Oil Price, Bad Is The New Good, by Art Berman

Markets are not always rational, but the world is still producing more oil than it consumes, which argues for lower oil prices sooner or later. From Art Berman, on a guest post at theburningplatform.com:

Lately, oil prices have gone up when they should have gone down. In the last week, OPEC decided not to cut production and the two major energy agencies reported that the world over-supply problem is getting worse. Brent futures increased from $62 to $65. Bad is the new good.

The expected bad news on Friday, June 5 that OPEC would not cut production was skillfully cloaked in positive statements about growing demand. On Monday, June 8, Brent opened at $62.69 and rose to $65.70 over the next two days.

On Tuesday, June 10, the EIA published its monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) that showed that the production surplus responsible for low oil prices had increased in May to almost 3 million barrels per day (bpd).

http://www.theburningplatform.com/2015/06/14/for-oil-price-bad-is-the-new-good/

To continue reading, and for some enlightening graphs: For Oil Price, Bad Is The  New Good

SSS Schools Admin on Fracking, by SSS

There is a lot of gloom and doom on the US fracking industry in the blogosphere, some of which SLL has featured. However, a more optimistic view is gaining currency. It may be because the price of oil has improved by $20 per barrel. SLL views that as a dead cat bounce and ultimately oil will take out its recent lows, but here’s SSS at theburningplatform.com with the more upbeat take on oil pricing and fracking:

Good news for frackers.

In mid-May 2015, domestic oil production increased by 300,000 bbl/day over the past 3 months to a grand total of 9.6 million bbl/day. This total domestic production is the highest it’s been since 1970, when domestic oil production started a long, 35 year slide to just under 5 million bbl/day in 2005.

In the 10 years since, the U.S. has added over 4.6 million bbl/day to its production, and fracking has accounted for 90% of that increase. For the math challenged, that’s 4.14 million bbl/day.

So why is domestic oil production increasing when so many predicted a death knell for the fracking industry as the global PRICE of oil plummeted from $110 a barrel to its current level of $60. It’s because the fracking companies still standing can profit from $60 a barrel and not the “conventional wisdom” that they need the global price of oil to remain at or above $80-85 a barrel. Several factors are in play.

—-Half of the NEW fracking wells started in September 2014 have been idled. Lower cost to the companies in energy consumed, equipment purchased or leased, and jobs required.

—-100,000 workers laid off. Huge savings to the companies in labor costs.

—-Less productive wells idled. Production at the best wells ramped up. Yes, this will deplete these wells even faster, but the companies have already identified promising replacements through …….

—-Skyrocketing technology in horizontal drilling, which can now burrow its way through the earth up to 15,000 feet using seismic imaging and a host of other breakthroughs to find what they’re looking for: huge amounts of recoverable oil. And the technology is working very, very well.

—-Bankruptcies. Sorry about the jobs lost or idled, but that’s how destructive capitalism works. The companies left standing are snapping up oil leases and idled equipment at fire sale prices, and …..

—-Institutional investors are watching closely. And they like what they see and have poured over $20 billion into the fracking companies in the past few months. This is precisely the OPPOSITE of what occurred in 1986 when the domestic oil industry collapsed and the banks and investors stampeded to the exits.

—-Finally, a coup de grace has been delivered to the radical environmental groups who have been fighting fracking for years based on spurious allegations that fracking threatens under ground water sources. Two days ago, the EPA released a multi-year study costing nearly $50 million dollars that it does not. The EPA study did not reveal ONE SINGLE INSTANCE of fracking fluids which compromised under ground water. Not one.

Fracking for oil is safe and critical to the economy and national security. Critical. I challenge the anti-frackers who have read these comments to present any case which refutes my analysis and firm support of the fracking industry. It will survive, and it will prosper. Greatly to the nation’s and individual’s benefit.

And I invite Admin to go first.

http://www.theburningplatform.com/2015/06/06/sss-schools-admin-on-fracking/

“Default Monday”: Oil & Gas Companies Face Their Creditors, by Wolf Richter

It wasn’t just the housing bubble that popped in 2007, it was the housing finance bubble, a wonderful agglomeration of sliced and diced mortgages that unraveled and thus started a systemic debt collapse. Now the back-end financing of the “fracking” miracle is unraveling, and everyone has their fingers crossed that it will have no “systemic repercussions.” SLL says it will (see “Oil Ushers in the Depression,” 12/1/14, and “Oil Economics, Part 2,” 12/3/14). Wolf Richter at wolfstreet.com provides an oil patch body count:

Debt funded the fracking boom. Now oil and gas prices have collapsed, and so has the ability to service that debt. The oil bust of the 1980s took down 700 banks, including 9 of the 10 largest in Texas. But this time, it’s different. This time, bondholders are on the hook.

And these bonds – they’re called “junk bonds” for a reason – are already cracking. Busts start with small companies and proceed to larger ones. “Bankruptcy” and “restructuring” are the terms that wipe out stockholders and leave bondholders and other creditors to tussle over the scraps.

Early January, WBH Energy, a fracking outfit in Texas, kicked off the series by filing for bankruptcy protection. It listed assets and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million. Small fry.

A week later, GASFRAC filed for bankruptcy in Alberta, where it’s based, and in Texas – under Chapter 15 for cross-border bankruptcies. Not long ago, it was a highly touted IPO, whose “waterless fracking” technology would change a parched world. Instead of water, the system pumps liquid propane gel (similar to Napalm) into the ground; much of it can be recaptured, in theory.

Ironically, it went bankrupt for other reasons: operating losses, “reduced industry activity,” the inability to find a buyer that would have paid enough to bail out its creditors, and “limited access to capital markets.” The endless source of money without which fracking doesn’t work had dried up.

http://wolfstreet.com/2015/03/05/default-monday-oil-gas-companies-face-their-creditors/

To continue reading: “Default Monday”

Crisis Progress Report (4), by Robert Gore

Today’s debt is tomorrow’s claim on future production, the unbreakable nexus between debt and production. If debt is incurred for a productive purpose and the return is higher than the interest rate charged, it adds to economic growth. If debt funds present consumption or uneconomic investment, then in the future that debt will necessarily mean that economic growth is less than it would have been in the absence of that debt, regardless of whether it or not it is repaid or refinanced. Repayment reduces the debtor’s future consumption or investment. Default reduces the creditor’s future consumption or investment. Either the debtor or the creditor has fewer funds with which to fund future investment, the basis of future production. Refinancing—replacing old debt with new—merely postpones the eventual outcome.

The world now has about $200 trillion in debt, or almost three times the world’s annual production of about $70 trillion (see “A World Overflowing With Debt,” SLL, 2/5/15). Most of that debt has been for consumption, transfer payments, or politically driven “investments,” which, unlike productive private-sector investments, will not generate economic returns sufficient to pay the debt. Mounting debt service costs, despite generational-low interest rates, are retarding or reversing economic growth in virtually all developed-country economies. Global debt continues to grow, which means repayment of interest, not principle, is imposing this burden on current production. While we all await the fateful snowflake that triggers the avalanche, those who want to know down which slope it will roll are advised to look to the link between debt and production.

If production shrinks at all, some debt will not be repaid. The oil market is first illustration of that point: its precipitous price decline made some production uneconomic, reducing producers’ ability to service debt. There have already been defaults and there will be more, in turn reducing consumption, investment, and eventually production, in ever-widening waves that are rippling and will continue to rippled out beyond the oil sector. Oil is in fact the snowflake, as SLL said back in December (“Oil Ushers in the Depression,” SLL, 12/1/14), just as housing was in 2007.

Europe is frantically trying to postpone its rendezvous with welfare-state destiny in Greece, but the debt has already been incurred and somebody will bear the burden of either its repayment or repudiation. For purposes of this analysis the eventual outcome matters not at all, only that it will inevitably arrive and will entail reductions in consumption, investment, and production, leading to economic contraction. Markets are anticipating all this, steadily marking down the prices of Greek debt and equities.

One facet of the current market adjustment process bears close attention: adjustments are sudden, large, and have far-reaching consequences. European governmental institutions and their financial adjuncts have lost control of the value of Greek debt. In less than five months, from last September to late January, the rate on Greece’s 10-year bond doubled, much as the price of oil more than halved over a period of a few months. When the Swiss central bank decided to unpeg the Swiss franc from the euro, the franc appreciated against the euro over 40 percent in a few hours. There was no bid for euros until the market established a much lower exchange rate (less francs per euro).

The oil, Greek debt, and Swiss franc markets, and their associated derivative markets, have one thing in common with virtually every other financial market around the world: they are heavily leveraged. If speculators are 20 times leveraged (not at all unusual), a 5 percent contra move in the underlying asset wipes them out, so they sell first and ask questions later. Bids and market liquidity evaporate, usually only reestablished at dramatically lower levels later on. The gap in price inflicts huge and often solvency-threatening losses, with substantial secondary effects. Yesterday, a capital hole of up to $8.51 billion in an Austrian bank set up to resolve bad loans was reported, in large part because of deteriorating eastern European Swiss franc mortgages. The mortgagees were essentially short the Swiss franc (see “‘Spectacular Developments’ in Austria: Bail-In Arrives after €7.6 Bad Bank Capital Hole “Discovered’,” from Zero Hedge, SLL, 3/2/15).

The world’s central banks have staked their all on monetizing debt to promote rising equity markets. There is much blather about new equity “wealth” promoting economic growth and rising incomes, but even governments’ statistics, manipulated and biased as they are, give the lie to that one. However, unless the link between equity markets and economic growth has been completely severed, two variables the central banks have sought to control are now in direct conflict. Debt monetization and interest rate suppression promote debt expansion as well as rising equity markets, but debt has become economically counterproductive (David Stockman calls it “peak debt). It now demonstrably retards rather than promotes growth, eventually leading to contraction and—barring that complete severance between equity markets and economies—falling equity markets.

Faltering, on-the-verge-of-contracting economies decrease the debt-servicing capabilities of those economies, and debt levels are rising. SLL has long hypothesized that there will come a day when over-indebted governments face the rising interest rates the government of Greece has already faced. That may be happening now, at least in the US and Japan, where rates have been rising, under the radar (it’s the last thing to which Washington, Wall Street, or Tokyo want to draw attention).

It may be just a blip, and as a trading vehicle only the most intrepid should jump aboard, but it bears close attention. Interest rates are a crucial variable that governments and central banks must control. Keep in mind that governments (including their central banking arms) have historically been “dumb money.” (Who can forget the British Treasury’s sale of gold from 1999 to 2002, at the bottom of the gold market?) A general rise in interest rates, and concomitant fall in bond prices, after years in which central banks have been buying huge amounts of bonds, would fit the “dumb money” historical pattern perfectly, and would inflict grievous losses on the central banks.

Remember the phrase from above concerning market adjustments: they are “sudden, large, and have far-reaching consequences.” Equity markets are just as leveraged as most other markets. Central banks are attempting to manipulate them upwards while at the same time promoting economic growth and suppressing interest rates. The Command and Control Futility Principle (governments and central banks can control one or more, but not all variables in a multi-variable system) and its corollary (due to the impossibility of controlling all variables, they will usually lose control of even the variable or variables they have attempted to control) imply that when they lose control of one of these variables, they will lose control of all them. There is virtually no chance that this loss of control will lead to anything but a gargantuan crash that wipes out a significant, by which is meant 50 to 75 percent, chunk of nominal equity wealth in a hurry. There is no chance that such a crash will not lead to a depression.

There are two classes of participants in today’s equity markets: those who know the game is rigged but think they can get out, perhaps even profit, when the music stops, and those who haven’t a clue. There were corresponding classes who were short the Swiss franc—everybody knew the Swiss central bank “had their backs.” Both classes were scorched when it stopped suppressing the franc’s price against the euro. The only investors who won’t get scorched when equity markets collapse are those who aren’t in them, or those who are fortunate enough to short them at the top. SLL recommends its readers join the former, with the latter being reserved for those with substantial trading experience using a fraction of their risk capital. It’s tough trying to time an avalanche.

AMERICA AT ITS GREATEST

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK

The Fed’s Secret Plan, by Robert Gore

Judging from last week’s action, the equity and corporate debt markets didn’t get the memo that the precipitous decline in oil was a tax cut, an unambiguous blessing for the US economy. America consumers were going to take that tax cut straight to the malls or internet and give retailers a Christmas stocking full of goodies. And they may well do so, but scratch the “unambiguous blessing” from the stories about falling oil prices; turns out there’s some ambiguity after all.

Up until its price dropped, the oil market was a poster child for the Federal Reserve’s policies. Plentiful and inexpensive money had kept oil’s price elevated and made financing the “boom” a snap. Unfortunately for the Fed, as SLL has noted, the marginal return on investment equilibrates to the marginal cost of capital, so as production increased, its expected return declined. Humans being human, booms get people overly excited, and often the expected returns goes negative, especially when the cost of debt is thrown in. Now there is nothing “expected” about negative returns in the oil patch, and suddenly, nobody wants to lend money to oil producers.

This presents a quandary for the Fed. It’s bent all its efforts the last six years to preventing deflation, and here deflation, with a capital D, arrives in the oil patch. In the Keynesian world view of the central banking cohort, debt is the fountainhead and sustenance of an economy, but there’s a bit of an aversion to existing oil debt. And new debt? No way. There’s nothing to worry about, however, for the PhD brain trust at the Fed is working on a secret plan that will turn frowns into smiles and as a side benefit, propel the Dow past 20,000.

Like all great plans, this one is simplicity itself: the Fed is going to mop up that oil glut its policies were so instrumental in creating. That’s right, the Fed is going into the oil business! It’s new policy will be called “petro-easing.” Why should central bank money printing and balance sheet expansion be limited to pieces of paper? In fact, petro-easing is better than quantitative easing, because the Fed will be getting back something tangible for its created-from-thin-air money, not some junky security like government debt from a bankrupt government. Not only will this move rescue the oil market, but from it will flow more of the usual benefits of quantitative easing—artificially low interest rates, malinvestment (including more malinvestment in the oil patch), cheap funding for banks, financial asset price boosting, and money in the pockets of leveraged speculators with access to cheap credit, who in turn can keep the purveyors of luxury items and services afloat.

Petro-easing presents a few problems. Won’t the Fed’s policy hinder markets’ responses to overproduction—cutting back production, reducing employment, repricing oil assets and debt, and all the other ways markets align demand with supply? What will the Fed do with all that physical oil as beleaguered producers the world over, including the governments of Venezuela, Russia, Iran, Nigeria, and Norway, slam its bid? Not to worry. Modern central bankers never have to acknowledge market forces, they just create more money. As for all that oil, maybe the Fed can buy refiners and gas stations. If that sounds absurd, so too does the idea of central banks buying government debt and other financial assets to promote prosperity. No proposition is too absurd for today’s central bankers.

WHAT WOULD WE DO WITHOUT A CENTRAL BANK?

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK

Bloomberg Connects the First Two Dots!

In “Fed Bubble Bursts in $550 Billion of Enerby Debt: Credit Markets,” Bloomber writers Christine Idzelis and Craig Torres connect the first two dots of the fading oil “boom”: cheap money from the Fed and the borrowing that fueled exploration and production. For those who want to read the article: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-11/fed-bubble-bursts-in-550-billion-of-energy-debt-credit-markets.html.

For those who want the rest of the dots connected, see SLL’s Oil Ushers in the Depression, and Oil Economics, Part 2.

Oil Economics, Part 2, by Robert Gore

Monday’s post, “Oil Ushers in the Depression,” was one of the most read, commented on, and controversial posts on SLL. Here is an amplification, and a doubling down on the prediction in that piece:

The sharp drop in oil will support U.S. growth by boosting spending, two top Federal Reserve officials said, playing down the risk that plunging energy costs could push inflation further below the Fed’s goal.

Fed Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer and New York Fed President William C. Dudley, speaking at separate events today in New York, both stressed the positive impact on the U.S. economy from the steepest decline in oil prices for five years.(Bloomberg, “Fed’s Dudley Says Oil Price Decline Will Strengthen U.S. Economic Recovery,” 12/1/14)

If that sounds eerily like Benjamin Bernanke’s infamous assurance that “…the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained,” it should (testimony before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress, 3/28/07). However, Fischer and Dudley go Bernanke one better. Bernanke at least acknowledged a problem, although he woefully underestimated its impact. The dynamic duo sees nothing but blue skies after oil’s precipitous fall. Their Panglossian visions reveal the rotten-to-the-core premise of Keynesian economics and complete ignorance of the towering debt skyscraper of cards their policies have helped erect.

In their Keynesian world, demand and consumption are the center of the solar system around which all other economic factors revolve. Reality, on the other hand, dictates that something must be produced before it is consumed, so we’ll stick with reality-based economics. Fischer and Dudley don’t even acknowledge that the falling price of oil might harm producers.

The Saudis are the world’s low cost producer. It is much cheaper to pump oil out of the desert than it is to frack it, extract it from tar sands or shale, or pump it from under the ocean, which is how oil is produced in much of the rest of the world. The Saudis amortized the costs of their petroleum industry long ago; the relevant cost to them is their marginal cost.They have decided to pump sufficient oil to drive its price low enough to make it uneconomic for many higher-cost producers to produce.

Their decision has political and economic motivations. The Saudis have been mightily displeased by the course of events in Syria. The Sunni Saudis don’t like Shiite Bashar Assad, Syria’s despot. They thought President Obama would fight their war for them when Assad crossed his red line. They were furious when Vladimir Putin gave Obama a face-saving out, not just because of Obama’s inconstancy, but also because Putin had thwarted a potential US attack against his ally, Assad. The U.S.’s half-hearted response to the Islamic State—its reluctance to put those all important boots on the ground—has further inflamed the Saudis, who view the campaign against the Islamic State as the perfect pretext for getting rid of Assad.

What better way to punish both the US and Russia (and perpetual enemy Shiite Iran), and reestablish dominance in oil, than by glutting the market? As a business plan, taking on debt at junk bond rates to fund oil production, as many US and Canadian producers have done, or basing government budgets and economic projections on a high price of oil, as Russia and many other oil-producing nations’ governments have done, leaves something to be desired when the lowest-cost producer can lay waste to your plan at any time.

The subprime fiasco offers the perfect analogy. Just as everything “worked” as long as house prices kept going up, the dreams in the oil patch seemed plausible when its price was high. As soon as oil’s price headed in the undesired direction in this highly leveraged market, the dreams evaporated, just as they did in the highly leveraged housing market. The debt of the most indebted producers, now losing money, is worth less than face value. Their creditors will eventually recognize losses. As previously noted, the one wrinkle is that so many producers are governments. They have not, in most cases, explicitly backed their debt with oil revenues, but they had assumed those revenues and based their future spending plans on them. Call it “soft” debt.

The dilemma is the same for both private and government producers. They can go on producing at an economic loss, for the cash flow, adding to the glut and the downward pressure on prices, or they can curtail production and their own revenues. The former is a short-term palliative only; the latter means immediate pain. Either way, total revenues accruing to uneconomic oil producers decline. Those producers will consume less—just as homeowners significantly curtailed their spending when house prices crashed, which is contractive and deflationary.

As the oil price drop leads to losses for producers, their suppliers, and creditors, assets will be sold, production curtailed, orders cancelled, and workers laid off. Eventually the price of oil will stabilize, but producers, especially government producers, may well continue to add to the glut due to short-term cash flow needs—it’s better than people taking to the streets. Even the House of Saud has committed much of its huge revenues to bribing their disaffected off the streets and keeping itself on the most kleptocratic and lucrative throne on the planet.

Dudley and Fischer refuse to acknowledge the debt daisy chain for which they and their fellow central bankers around the world are largely responsible, just as Greenspan and Bernanke have never fessed up to their mortgage-debt-and-securitization daisy chains. When oil-based debt implodes, it will stay as “contained” as the subprime implosion; daisy chains are daisy chains. However, given the much higher level of world debt now, the fallout from this conflagration compared to last time will be akin to the difference in fallout between hydrogen and atomic bombs.

IT’S THAT GOOD. LOOKING FOR THE BOOK THAT SOME READERS READ IN A DAY,  AND MOST WITHIN A WEEK?

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK

Oil Ushers in the Depression, by Robert Gore

The mathematics of debt growth in excess of underlying economic growth are inescapable. Taken to its logical extreme, every asset would be collateralized and debt service would stifle economic activity. Before that point is reached, however, debt becomes an unbearable economic burden—its costs exceed its benefits—which throws debt formation into reverse. The reversal in a system whereby fiat money, governmental borrowing, and central banking have divorced debt growth from the real economy is swift, dramatic, and inevitably contractive and deflationary. (Straight Line Logic, “A Skyscraper of Cards,” 10/19/14)

When “magic” economic nostrums can no longer keep an economy running in place, it falls backwards, painfully. In “non-magic” economics, debt growth well in excess of economic growth for an extended period, rising taxes, and increased regulatory sand in the gears and government rent-seeking eventually produces an economy that not only stops growing, but contracts. Almost immediately, debt in the most leveraged sectors of the economy starts unravelling, and in a debt-saturated economy that unravelling spreads quickly, because virtually every financial asset is someone else’s debt (or equity, which occupies an even lower rung on the priority-of-payback ladder). In 2008, it started with mortgages and mortgage-backed securities and engulfed the world’s financial system with frightening speed. (Straight Line Logic, “The Economics of Debt, Deterioration, Deflation, Depression, and Disorder,” 11/17/14)

The future is now. The carnage in the oil sector, where a glut has knocked over a third off its price in less than five months, is not an aberration, but a harbinger—the shape of things to come across sectors and around the world. It kicks off the depression, or more accurately, the resumption of the depression that started in either 2000 or 2007 (let the statisticians quibble about that determination).

The oil industry is a perfect example of the analyses in the two articles cited above. The only wrinkle is that so many of the major participants are governments, but that does not change the conclusion. All of the oil-producing nations’ governments had assumed a much higher oil price, and budgeted accordingly. Of those governments, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states have the lowest costs of production. Even at the current price, their production is break-even or profitable, but their total revenues are falling far short of budget projections. For other nations, the situation is much more dire. Not only are revenues coming up short, but they are losing money with every barrel they pump; their costs of production are higher than the current price.

Their spending plans are an implicit lien on their future oil production. That is in addition to their explicit liens; many of the governments have incurred heavy debts. The plunging price of oil is a margin call, and the governments have no choice but to curtail spending, raise taxes, and sell assets, which in many cases means selling more oil for the cash flow—even if it results in economic loss—adding to the glut. Next up: debt defaults. Eventually uneconomic oil production will have to stop, adding to unemployment and economic contraction.

Venezuela, a major oil producer, is on the cutting edge. Social spending has been the only thing keeping President Nicolas Maduro in power. However, things have gotten so bad that he recently had to seek an emergency loan from China. Venezuela is burning through its foreign exchange reserves and when the Chinese loan is gone, default on foreign-currency-denominated debt will be inevitable. On Bolivar-denominated debt, Maduro will further crank up the printing presses to inflate away the liability. Inflation, already running at more than 60 percent per annum, will skyrocket. The situation is not quite as grim in other large oil-producing nations, including Russian, Mexico, and Nigeria, but without a quick recovery in the price of oil (a low-odds bet), they will soon be sharing Venezuela’s pain.

In the US, it is a matter of debate concerning the break-even price for oil production in various producing areas, and how leveraged producers are. However, some of them are losing money at sub-$70 per barrel oil, and cheap money and compressed credit spreads have led some of them to take on too much debt. So the US oil industry, lately touted as the greatest American economic miracle since Silicon Valley, is sharing the pain, too, as a glance at oil company stock and bond price charts the last few months will confirm. Even Silicon Valley has its ups and downs.

If, as the media keep repeating, the oil price drop is a “tax cut” in the US, we should get ready for more such tax cuts as the price of many goods and services falls. The oil industry is a large enough component of the global economy that its looming contraction, coupled with weakening economies (some are already in recession) throughout the developed and developing world, should get the snowball rolling on the debt contraction-deflation-depression progression mentioned above. Unfortunately, our tax cuts are going to be pretty puny compared to the costs of rising unemployment, widespread defaults, falling asset prices, and contracting economies.

Batten down the hatches.

A HISTORICAL NOVEL THAT’S A PERFECT ANTIDOTE TO TODAY’S BLEAK SCENE, AND A PERFECT HOLIDAY GIFT!!!

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK