Testing 1,2,3, by Raúl Ilargi Meijer

Dodgy, incompletely tested vaccines are fine. Remedies like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin that work in the field are dangerous because they haven’t been completely tested and thus their use should be discouraged. Very little about the coronavirus response has made any sense at all. From Raúl Ilargi Meijer at theautomaticearth.com:

We’re running two grand experiments at the same time: we inject 100s of millions with untested substances, and then we let them fly and gather and tell them it’s safe to do so.

First things first: none of the “vaccines” that are being injected as we speak into 100s of millions of people have been approved by “medical authorities”. The Pfizer and Moderna mRNA ones, as well as the AstraZeneca and in some places Johnson&Johnson “substances” have only, best case, gotten a permit for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

This is needed because none of these things have ever been properly tested. The “logic” behind this is that we are in an emergency, so there’s no time for testing. Somehow, this “logic” is combined with claims about “listening to the science”. While not testing is the direct opposite of science.

In order to get the Emergency Use Authorizations, you need to show that there are no other substances available that could perform the job that the “vaccines” do. I put “Vaccines” in quotation marks because mRNA are not vaccines in the traditional sense, they are, at least potentially, much more invasive. A factor that has… never been properly tested.

The other substances that might work vs the coronavirus, repurposed drugs such as ivermectin and (hydroxy) chloroquine -about which many doctors have written very positive reviews-, if the (EUA) label is to be put on the new “vaccines”, must also remain untested, just like the “vaccines” themselves.

So there are a few “tests” out there that applied HCQ and ivermectin, but in the wrong environment. See, if you give them only to 80+ year-olds who are already on an intubator and have multiple co-morbidities, you may well end up with the verdict that they did not prevent that person from dying. The thing is, the same would be true if you gave that person an mRNA “vaccine”. But that last bit, we don’t hear about.

Continue reading→

One response to “Testing 1,2,3, by Raúl Ilargi Meijer

  1. Politicians act in the same way as hardened criminals. They NEVER admit their mistakes, even crimes until they have been cornered by hard evidence and convicted – and even then their establishment cronies let them off with slap on the wrist penalties and the pet-dog media sells sob stories about how cruel it is to punish people with families/a new baby/ a health condition/old age/ their pet is missing them/ and how sensitive they are and only human and anyone can make a mistake. So I don’t expect that “those in charge” will ever be held to account for the deaths, illness, financial ruin, damage to families and wholesale suffering their deliberate, intentional, planned acts have caused.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.