Tag Archives: Fidel Castro

Lift the U.S. Embargo on Cuba, by Jacob G. Hornberger

The US has embargoed Cuba for 60 years without changing its regime or system of government. Makes you wonder about the effectiveness of all those other sanctions the government has imposed. From Jacob G. Hornberger at fff.org:

The U.S. embargo on Cuba has been in effect for 60 years. It’s time to end it.

The embargo makes it a criminal offense for any American to spend money in Cuba or to do business in Cuba. If an American travels to Cuba and spends money there or does business there, he is subject to criminal prosecution, conviction, fine, and imprisonment by his own government upon his return to the United States.

The purpose of the embargo is regime change. The idea is to squeeze the Cuban people economically with the aim of causing discontent against Cuba’s communist regime. If the discontent gets significant enough, U.S. officials believe, the population will revolt and re-install a pro-U.S. regime into power.

Where is the morality in targeting the civilian population with death and impoverishment with the aim of achieving a political goal? Isn’t that why we condemn terrorism?

I say “re-install” because Cuba had a pro-U.S. dictator in power before the Cuban revolution installed Fidel Castro into power. The country was ruled by a man named Fulgencio Batista, one of the most brutal and corrupt dictators in the world. U.S. officials didn’t care about his tyranny because he was a pro-U.S. dictator — that is, one who could be counted on to do the bidding of the U.S. government.

But the Cuban people, who were suffering under Batista’s regime, revolted against it. Successfully ousting Batista from power, new Cuban dictator Fidel Castro made it clear that he would be no such puppet. In the eyes of U.S. officials, that made him a threat to “national security.”

Continue reading

Communism Again Gets a Free Pass, by Erico Matias Tavares

Between them leaders of communist people’s paradises are responsible for over 100 million direct deaths, but how many have ever been called to account for their crimes. Fidel Castro certainly wasn’t. From Erico Matias Tavares at linkedin.com:

With well over 100 million direct casualties and countless other social, economic and environmental disasters under its name, communism is arguably the worst human experiment in history. And yet, how many communist leaders have been formally prosecuted in a court of law for their crimes?

This week with the passing of Fidel Castro – another “distinguished” ‎butcher comrade with all the assorted hypocrisies – we were reminded of how that scourge of humanity got a free pass yet again. The world by and large missed a great opportunity to set the historical record straight.

The bulk of international media and Western leaders for the most part reminded us of his important deeds and contribution to 20th century history. In fact you could almost be forgiven for thinking that it was Ghandi who had passed away.

The top prize for adulation undoubtedly went to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the glamour poster boy of Western progressivism, who wrote “Fidel Castro was a larger than life leader who served his people for almost half a century.”

Perhaps he should have detailed exactly what “service” Castro performed. That Cuba is a tropical version of totalitarian hell is beyond dispute. One in five Cubans left their homeland by any means possible after Castro took over power – eventually including his own daughter. Those who stayed behind either played along or ended up in jail, joining thousands of other dissidents. Homosexuals were assaulted and persecuted, as documented in movies such as “When Night Falls” (with an awesome performance by Javier Bardem in the leading role).

To continue reading: Communism Again Gets a Free Pass

 

Fidel Castro and the American Empire, by Antonius Aquinas

It’s an ugly suggestion, that sometimes the US must bear some of the blame for its problems, but that’s exactly what Antonius Aquinas is suggesting. From Aquinas, on a guest post on theburningplatform.com:

The death of the brutal Cuban Communist dictator Fidel Castro closes the door, in some respect, on another disastrous page in US foreign policy history. For all the denunciations and criticism of Castro from conservative elements and exiled Cubans, his despotic rule was the outcome of decades of American imperialism which began with President William McKinley’s infamous decision to wage war on hapless Spain in 1898.

The defeat of Spain and the confiscation of its possessions, which the US imperialist and corporate forces had longed prized, set the stage for the nation’s hubristic foreign policy course throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. America’s action against Spain showed its ungratefulness for it attacked the country that did more for it than any other (including France) in its struggle for independence. Maybe Castro’s interminable reign, which had always been a thorn in the side of US globalists, was payback for America’s wanton aggression against Spain.

Castro’s rise to power came about not only through the bungling of American diplomacy, but also from genuine “populist” support directed against the thoroughly corrupt regime of the US puppet in charge at the time, Fulgencio Batista. Even by Latin American standards, the corruption which existed under Batista was legendary!

The US government played an enormous role in Batista’s second presidency which began when he seized power in 1952. Throughout his second tenure, Batista received massive kickbacks from American multinational businesses for grants of monopoly privileges on the island. The most notable was the ITT corporation.

To continue reading: Fidel Castro and the American Empire

He Said That? 11/25/16

From Fidel Castro, who died today,  “I Won’t Be a Dictator,” interview with Ruth Lloyd (January 1959), printed in The Spokesman-Review (24 May 1959):

I am not a dictator, and I do not think I will become one. I will not maintain power with a machine gun.

That’s what they all say.