Tag Archives: Raw materials

East vs West, ‘Stuff’ vs ‘Finance’, by Kurt Cobb

The foundation of economic progress is not debt. From Kurt Cobb at oilprice.com:

  • It seems increasingly apparent that the focus on “finance” will be less rewarding and the focus on “stuff” will become more important to the nations of the world.
  • In advanced countries, the percentage of the total economy devoted to services has long exceeded that devoted to goods.
  • All service industries remain completely dependent on the raw materials and manufactured goods sectors to function.

As a military conflict rages in Ukraine between Russia and what the Russian government calls “the West” (apparently meaning NATO allies and particularly the United States), there is a parallel economic battle between “stuff” and “finance.” Both categories are affected by economic sanction regimes imposed by each side. But there is a striking difference in what each side has to sell. In advanced countries, the percentage of the total economy devoted to services has long exceeded that devoted to goods. This is a reflection of the increasing productivity of those working in manufacturing, mining, agriculture, forestry and fishing who make it possible for so many people to work in service industries. These raw materials and goods industries provide all the stuff those of us in the service economy require to stay alive and perform our services.

It is a testament to the remarkable rise in productivity of the raw materials and goods industries that in the United States, for example, the service sector accounts for almost 77 percent of all economic activity. In France, the percentage is about 70 percent. In Russia the percentage is a little lower, about 68 percent, which may reflect Russia’s relatively large mining, forestry, and agriculture inputs to its economy.

Continue reading→

Washington and Moscow Vie for the Stupid Prize, by Paul Craig Roberts

Of all the global economies, Russia’s is the one that comes closest to self-sufficiency, so there is no reason for the nation to adopt its economic policies towards the generation of foreign exchange. From Paul Craig Roberts at paulcraigroberts.org:

Is it Washington or the Kremlin which is the most confused about sanctions and their impact?  Washington and Europe have made it very clear that sanctions do not apply to payments for Russian energy and minerals.  Only the US has banned the import of Russian gas and oil.  As the US uses no Russian gas and only 7% of its oil is from Russia, the sanction is without effect.  There are no bans on imports of Russian minerals as the West can’t get by without them, just as Europe, especially German industry, cannot get by without Russian energy. There are no sanctions on banks for processing payments for Russian energy and minerals.

So, what do the Western sanctions do?  They identify for Russia the pressure points where Russian sanctions on the West can severely damage the West.  Why doesn’t Russia use this power?

I think for two totally erroneous reasons.  One is that Russia wants to prove that she is a reliable business partner that fulfills her contracts and doesn’t use trade relations as a weapon.  But what good does this do Russia when the US and Europe are not reliable business partners and do use trade as a weapon? As Russia is the only reliable partner in the deal, Russia is taken for a ride.

The other erroneous reason is that Russia’s economists and central bank, brainwashed by US neoliberal economists, believe Russia cannot develop without foreign exchange.  The central bank even thinks that it cannot create rubles to finance investment projects unless the rubles are backed up by foreign exchange.  This has caused the central bank to borrow money it doesn’t need on which it pays interest.  In other words, the Russian central bank’s policy is nonsensical and serves Western interests at Russia’s expense.

Continue reading→