Tag Archives: Cash

Safes Sell Out In Japan, 1,000 Franc Note Demand Soars As NIRP Triggers Cash Hoarding, by Tyler Durden

Who would believe that people would take their cash out of banks rather than pay negative interest rates or throw it at overvalued stocks and bonds? Anybody who doesn’t have an Ivy League degree in economics, that’s who. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Negative rates may not have found their way to bank deposits in most locales (yet), but that doesn’t mean the public isn’t starting to see the writing on the wall.

At first, NIRP was an anomaly. An obscure policy tool that most analysts and market watchers assumed would be implemented on a temporary basis in a kind of “let’s see if this is even possible” experiment with an idea that, from a common sense perspective, makes no sense.

But then a funny thing happened. Central banks from Denmark to Sweden to Switzerland went negative and stayed there. They even doubled down, taking rates even more negative and before you knew it, the public started to catch on.

When NIRP failed to resuscitate global growth and trade, the cash ban calls began. The thinking is simple (if crazy): if you do away with physical banknotes, the effective lower bound is thereby eliminated. You can make rates as negative as you like because the public has no recourse as people aren’t able to push back by eschewing their bank accounts the mattress.

If that seems far-fetched, consider that the ECB is seriously considering pulling the €500 euro note and the calls are growing louder for the Fed to drop the $100 bill. Of course officials are pitching the big bill bans as an attempt to fight crime – because only a criminal would pay with a $100. But the underlying push is for a cashless society wherein monetary authorities can effectively force citizens to spend and thereby boost the economy by simply making interest rates deeply negative.

Now that the cash ban calls have gotten sufficiently loud to be heard by the generally clueless masses and now that the likes of Jose Canseco are shouting about negative rates, savers are beginning to pull their money out of the banks.

“Look no further than Japan’s hardware stores for a worrying new sign that consumers are hoarding cash–the opposite of what the Bank of Japan had hoped when it recently introduced negative interest rates,” WSJ wrote this morning. “Signs are emerging of higher demand for safes—a place where the interest rate on cash is always zero, no matter what the central bank does.”

To continue reading: Safes Sell Out In Japan, 1,000 Franc Note Demand Soars As NIRP Triggers Cash Hoarding

Banning Cash: Serfdom In Our Time, by Paul Rosenberg

A good article as far as it goes, but Paul Rosenberg misses the third reason to ban cash: to prevent bank runs, which are surely coming. From Rosenberg at freemansperspective.com:

Over the last few months a stream of articles have crossed my screen, all proclaiming the need of governments and banks to eliminate cash. I’m sure you’ve noticed them too.

It is terrorists and other assorted madmen, we are told, who use cash. And so, to protect us from being blown up and dismembered on our very own street corners, governments will have to ban it.

It would actually take some effort to imagine a more obvious, naked attempt at fearmongering. Cash – in daily use for centuries if not millennia – is now, suddenly, the agent of spring-loaded, instant death? And we’re supposed to just accept that line?

But there are good reasons why the insiders are promoting these stories now. The first of them, perhaps, is simply that they can: After 9/11, a massive wave of compliance surged through the West. It may not last forever, but it’s still rolling, and if the entertainment corporations can pump enough fear into minds that want to believe, they may just get them to buy it.

The second reason, however, is the real driver:

Negative Interest Rates

The urgency of their move to ban one of the longest-lasting pillars of daily life means that the backroom elites think it will be necessary soon. It would appear that the central banks, the IMF, the World Bank, the BIS, and all their backers, see the elimination of cash as a central survival strategy.

The reason is simple: cash would allow people to escape from the one thing that could save their larcenous currency system: negative interest rates.

To make this clear, I like to paraphrase a famous (and good) quote from Alan Greenspan, back from 1966, during his Ayn Randian days: The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.

That was a true statement, and with a slight modification, it succinctly explains the new war on cash:

The preservation of an insolvent currency system requires that the owners of currency have no way to protect it.

To continue reading: Banning Cash: Serfdom In Our Time

Norway’s Biggest Bank Demands Cash Ban, by Tyler Durden

This is why money is way too important to be left to governments. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

The war on cash is escalating faster than many had imagined. Having documented the growing calls from the elites and propagandist explanations of the “benefits” to their serfs over the last few years, with China, and The IMF entering the “cashless society” call most recently, International Business Times reports that Norway – suffering from its own economic collapse as oil revenues crash – has joined its Scandi peers Denmark and Sweden in a call to “ban cash.”

By way of background, as we explained previously, What exactly does a “war on cash” mean?

It means governments are limiting the use of cash and a variety of official-mouthpiece economists are calling for the outright abolition of cash. Authorities are both restricting the amount of cash that can be withdrawn from banks, and limiting what can be purchased with cash.

These limits are broadly called “capital controls.”

Why Now? Why are governments suddenly so keen to ban physical cash?

The answer appears to be that the banks and government authorities are anticipating bail-ins, steeply negative interest rates and hefty fees on cash, and they want to close any opening regular depositors might have to escape these forms of officially sanctioned theft. The escape mechanism from bail-ins and fees on cash deposits is physical cash, and hence the sudden flurry of calls to eliminate cash as a relic of a bygone age — that is, an age when commoners had some way to safeguard their money from bail-ins and bankers’ control.

Forcing Those With Cash To Spend or Gamble Their Cash

The conventional answer voiced by Mr. Buiter is that recession and credit contraction result from households and enterprises hoarding cash instead of spending it. The solution to recession is thus to force all those stingy cash hoarders to spend their money.

And the benefits of a cashless society to banks and governments are self-evident:

1. Every financial transaction can be taxed.

2. Every financial transaction can be charged a fee.

3. Bank runs are eliminated.

In fractional reserve systems such as ours, banks are only required to hold a fraction of their assets in cash. Thus a bank might only have 1 percent of its assets in cash. If customers fear the bank might be insolvent, they crowd the bank and demand their deposits in physical cash. The bank quickly runs out of physical cash and closes its doors, further fueling a panic.

The federal government began insuring deposits after the Great Depression triggered the collapse of hundreds of banks, and that guarantee limited bank runs, as depositors no longer needed to fear a bank closing would mean their money on deposit was lost.

But since people could conceivably sense a disturbance in the Financial Force and decide to turn digital cash into physical cash as a precaution, eliminating physical cash also eliminates the possibility of bank runs, as there will be no form of cash that isn’t controlled by banks.

So, when the dust has settled who ultimately benefits by this war on cash – government and the central banks, pure and simple.

To continue reading: Norway’s Biggest Bank Demands Cash Ban

The Deep State and the War on Cash, by Bill Bonner

From Bill Bonner at acting-man.com:

An Attention-Grabbing Headline

“The first shot in the War on Cash?”

The headline caught our attention. We’d just finished researching and writing about the “Deep State” for the latest issue of our monthly publication, The Bill Bonner Letter.

This is something you’re likely to hear more about. The Deep State describes the way the U.S. government really works, rather than the way it’s supposed to work.

Over the years – hardly noticed by the press or the public – a group of insiders has taken control of Washington.

Originally the term “Deep State” was coined to describe various anti-democratic coalitions within the political system of Turkey (Turkish: derin devlet). In them meantime the term is widely used to describe all types of “state-within-the-state” type arrangements, the real power behind the throne, so to speak. Image via gadflyonline.com

Some of them are familiar government hacks and politicians. Some, largely anonymous, are in the private sector. And some represent foreign governments, foreign businesses (notably banks), and foreign organizations.

These zombies and cronies – who number in the thousands – have much more power and authority than 100 million voters. Research shows that if they want legislation, they get it.

Voters, on the other hand, get what they want only rarely… and probably only because the insiders want the same thing. The insiders get the money, too. The tens of trillions of dollars diverted into boondoggle bailouts, QE, and ZIRP, for example – they had to go to someone.

And now the Deep State is setting itself up to get even more…

WOLF-IN-SHEEPS-CLOTHING-2

Now you know why it had such large eyes and such big teeth …

Image via psychologytoday.com

To continue reading: The Deep State and the War on Cash

 

Who Exactly is Trying to Kill off Cash? by Don Quijones

From Don Quijones at wolfstreet.com:

Your Children “Will Not Know What Cash Is.”

In the Irish city of Cork, business leaders recently launched a three-month pilot project to encourage consumers to abandon the archaic use of cash by offering the chance to enter into a prize draw if they use electronic means of payment. It is a cheap, almost insulting inducement, but nonetheless probably an effective one. The ultimate aim of the scheme is to transform Cork into the first Irish city to go completely cashless.

The Race to Kill Off Cash

A few years ago such an aspiration — to do away with physical cash, a form of payment that has served mankind, for better or worse, richer or poorer, for millennia — might have seemed a little odd. Not anymore. Today cities all over the globe and even entire nations appear to be in a mad rush to kill off cash.

One obvious place that springs to mind is Scandinavia, where Denmark and Sweden are engaged in a neck and neck race to become Europe’s first cashless nation. But the trend extends far beyond Scandinavia. In London, where physical money has been practically abolished from the public transport system, the borough of Brent has proudly declared itself the first district council to go completely cashless — with a little bit of help from MasterCard.

In May this year the city of Bergamo launched an ambitious pilot scheme to become Italy’s first cashless city. The initiative, which awards people who use electronic payments with discounts on retail products, is sponsored by (once again) MasterCard, together with CartaSi, Visa, UbiBanca, Banca Popolare di Bergamo and Banco Popolare.

Meanwhile, in the UK region of South Gloucestershire, the local Conservative Party is spitting venom about the lack of “a genuinely comprehensive, multi-model, London-style [i.e. completely cashless] ‘Oyster’ payment system” for new planned Metrobus routes.

“If the Metrobus is really going to present the traveling public with something different, then the Authority must insist that electronic alternatives to the issuing of paper tickets by drivers is made a contractual condition of any procurement or tender,” thunders Cllr Lucas. “A ‘Brunel’ card would avoid all of the easily foreseeable problems such as unnecessary delays, engineered congestion, confusion, and fragmented service coverage which arise from sticking with traditional forms of payment.”

These are all small, anecdotal examples of a very large, potentially world-changing trend. As I reported in “First They Came for the Pennies in the War on Cash,” the world’s biggest cashless laboratory is sub-Saharan Africa, where Western NGOs and GOs (Government Organizations) are working hand-in-hand with banks, telecom companies, and local authorities to replace cash with mobile money alternatives.

To continue reading: Who Exactly is Trying to Kill off Cash?

What the heck is happening in Sweden? Negative rates, cash bans, housing bubble and enormous debt, by Andrew Moran

Sweden may be a preview of monetary coming attractions in the US. From Andrew Moran at economiccollapsenews.com:

We have a message to all of the Bernie Sanders supporters and those who are fixated on Scandinavia: give up your obsession of Sweden. It doesn’t do anything to further your case as there are a lot of downward trends transpiring in the nation of Ingmar Bergman films, Ikea products and meatballs (SEE: ‘Socialist Paradise’ Sweden suffering from swelling debt levels, employee absenteeism).

The main question that must be asked, however, is this: what the heck is happening in Sweden?

Sweden is on the cusp of being the very first nation in the world to conduct an economic experiment of this kind: negative interest rates in a cashless society. That’s right. The central planners are charging you to save your money in a bank, while eliminating the use of cash. You’re stuck if you’re living in the home of beautiful blondes and August Strindberg plays.

Last week, the Swedish central bank (Riksbank) announced that it would leave its benchmark interest rate unchanged at -0.35 percent, a rate that has been instituted since the summer. There were talks of Sweden going deep into negative rates, but it instead opted to go for another round of its own version of quantitative easing.

Financial institutions have yet to impose negative rates on Swedish consumers, but many economists do believe the central bank will keep this negative rate policy for a while. This means retail banks will have no other choice but to start implementing negative rates and passing the costs to its customers.

To continue reading: What the heck is happening in Sweden?

Why Stocks Are Sliding: For The First Time Since 2009 Spending On Buybacks Surpasses Free Cash Flow, by Tyler Durden

Don’t look now, but the US stock market’s biggest buyers of stocks are losing their wherewithal and consequently, must reluctantly pull away from the market. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Back in early 2014, we first explained how it was possible that with the Fed’s QE tapering, the S&P kept rising higher despite declining intervention by the Fed in capital markets: the answer was corporate buybacks, which had then soared to the highest level in history.

This artificial stock-support by CFOs and Treasurers only increased in the subsequent year, with buyback announcements hitting a record high one year later, in May 2015, as also profiled previously.

Then after the early euphoria of 2015, repurchase activity slowed down. As Factset observes in its just released quarterly buyback report, the dollar-value of share repurchases amounted to $134.4 billion over the second quarter (July), which represented a 6.9% decline from the first quarter (April) and a 0.4% decline year-over-year. On a trailing twelve-month basis (TTM), dollar-value share repurchases totaled $555.5 billion, which was approximately flat with the first quarter.

On the surface, this is good news, but, and here there is a huge “but”… because the reason for the drop off in buybacks has nothing to do with corporate executives reigning in their desires for higher stock prices and thus, higher equity-linked compensation, and everything to do with funding limits. Because while buyback activity may be slowing down it is only due to one thing: a collapse in free cash flow among S&P500 companies, with energy companies at the forefront, but increasingly all sectors being hit by a dramatic slow down in FCF creation. According to Factset while LTM buybacks declined by 1.3%, Free Cash Flow over the same period plunged by a whopping 29%!

To continue reading: Spending On Buybacks Surpasses Free Cash Flow

The Bull Market in Cash Is On, by Brian Hunt and Ben Morris

From Brian Hunt and Ben Morris, editors DailyWeath Trader, at growthstockwire.com:

In late March, we called it “one of the best assets to hold in uncertain markets” in our DailyWealth Trader service…

The title has since proven its merit.

The asset’s value has climbed 6% relative to U.S. stocks… and 10% relative to European stocks. Its value has risen 8% relative to gold… and 14% relative to silver. Its value even climbed close to 1% compared with 10-year U.S. government bonds, which are considered some of the safest assets in the world.

How has this asset performed in U.S. dollars?

Well… it is the U.S. dollar. The asset is cash.

Stocks have fallen hard over the last month. If you had most of your assets in stocks, it was probably hard to stomach. Gold and silver have declined, too, but more gradually. At the same time, the value of your cash has climbed…

Think about it this way… When an asset falls, it isn’t just a bear market in that asset… It’s also a bull market in cash. It’s an increase in the amount of assets you can afford.

To continue reading: The Bull Market in Cash Is On

Heads In a Basket, by Robert Gore

Spend enough time contemplating the lunacy that pervades society and you find that physical reality offers blessed relief. Release a ball and it drops because of the earth’s mass and consequently, its gravity. It works every time, not subject to anyone’s whim. Gravity, time, space, light, energy, and other phenomena can be defined and explained. As science progresses, definitions and explanations change as scientists search for the logic that most closely correspond to reality. Many of humanity’s affairs, on the other hand, defy logic and deny reality.

One innovation combines the unfortunate propensities to defy and deny with the mathematical certainty of Boyle’s law and the mechanical precision of a dropping guillotine blade: debt. In exchange for a promise of future repayment, borrowers acquire the wherewithal to invest or consume beyond their current means. Creditors forego present consumption and assume the risk of nonpayment. Defiance and denial arrive when debtors cannot repay their debts. Mathematical certainty stems from compound interest: unpaid debt increases exponentially. Mechanical precision arrives with default, the only question being who bears the loss. Will it be the debtor’s, creditor’s, or both heads in the basket?

Much of a century’s worth of financial “innovation” represents a desire to defy logic and deny reality. At the heart of banking lies an uncomfortable reality: depositors have a right to their money on demand (hence the term demand deposit), but the bank cannot satisfy that demand if all of its depositors want their money at the same time. The money is lent out or invested as bankers seek a return. Only a fraction of it is kept on reserve to satisfy withdrawals (hence the term fractional-reserve banking). Depositors are unsecured creditors of the bank, which they may not realize until they are unable to withdraw their money. The financial system is inherently interconnected; a run at one bank can quickly become systemic.

Bank runs were a vicissitude of 19th century American finance, the primary impetus behind the establishment of the Federal Reserve. The central bank would supply what was termed an “elastic” currency (fiat money created by the central bank) to its member banks in exchange for sound collateral, mostly short-term commercial paper, to prevent bank runs and generalized panics from seizing the financial system. It was the first step by the government to ameliorate the central risk of fractional-reserve banking. The second came during the Great Depression with the establishment of deposit insurance, which put the government on the hook for deposits—the banks’ unsecured debts to its depositors—up to a limit that has been periodically raised. The Too Big To Fail (TBTF) doctrine puts the government on the hook for all of the liabilities of a select group of banks, deemed so large that their failure poses a systemic risk to the global financial system.

Fractional-reserve banking guarantees the banking system a front row seat for any significant financial perturbation. It is leveraged, a repository for large pools of depositor money, and at the heart of the payments mechanism. Getting a handle on how much banks are leveraged is virtually impossible. The large ones are in the thick of the derivatives trade, especially interest rate derivatives. The notational value of such derivatives is in the hundreds of trillions of dollars, many times world GDP, but much of that exposure is supposedly netted out. However, when counterparties fail, as they did in 2008, net exposures become gross exposures. While governments claim to backstop banks, the fundamental instability posed by fractional-reserve banking has not gone away. Nobody knows how much risk there is within the system, especially what’s lurking in the  TBTF banks. The regulators are as clueless now as they were in 2008, but confident that their vastly augmented regulations will prevent disaster. (SLL will take the other side of that bet.)

Much has been made, at least in the blogosphere, of recent proposals to abolish cash. The civil liberties aspect of such proposals merit attention and discussion, but there has been little notice of a more disturbing aspect. If cash is outlawed, then everyone must keep their money in banks and use the banking system for payments (Martin Armstrong mentioned it in a recent post, “This Time It Is Different,” armstrongeconomics.com). That makes everybody an unsecured creditor of banks, whether they want to be or not. Cash may be outlawed not just as one more step to the Orwellian state or to facilitate the central banks’ dopey effort to drive interest rates deeper into negative territory, but to keep money from fleeing the banking system when logic can no longer be defied, nor realty denied, and banks and financial systems crash as debt crushes the global economy.

Banning cash will make the unsecured liabilities (customer deposits) of a banking system that was insolvent seven years ago—and will be so again—the medium of exchange. While coins and paper money are backed only by promises from politicians not to create too much of them, they will represent Rock of Gibraltar solidity compared to those unsecured deposits trapped within the banks. Look at banking system risks now and imagine the new risks bankers will take when they know money cannot leave the system. It is the ultimate involuntary bail-in, preceding rather than following bank insolvency.

When the economy collapses under the weight of debt, there will be no way for depositors herded into the banking system holding pen to avoid the guillotine. Governments that won’t allow there own coins and paper to be used as mediums of exchange will certainly not allow gold or silver to function as such. However, in the black market that will be the only functioning economy, gold and silver will be accepted—albeit not legal—tender. Which suggests that if you want to keep your head out of the basket, put away some of those time-tested mediums of exchange now. Keeping your stash hidden from the government will be child’s play compared to getting anything of value out of failed banks.

WHEN THE DOLLAR WAS GOOD AS GOLD

TGP_photo 2 FB

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK

He Said That? 4/26/15

From economist and former US Secretary of Labor Robert Reich:

There will be a time – I don’t know when, I can’t give you a date – when physical money is just going to cease to exist.

The “War on Cash” in 10 Spine-Chilling Quotes,” SLL, 4/26/15

Unfortunately, he’s right.