Tag Archives: Janet Yellen

Yelling ‘Stay’ In A Burning Theater—–Yellen Ignites Another Robo-Trader Spasm, by David Stockman

From David Stockman at davidstockmanscontracorner.com:

Simple Janet has attained a new milestone as a public menace with her speech to the Economic Club of New York. It amounted to yelling “stay” in a burning theater!

The stock market has been desperately trying to correct for months now because even the casino regulars can read the tea leaves. That is, earnings are plunging, global trade and growth are swooning and central bank “wealth effects” pumping has not trickled down to the main street economy. Besides, there are too many hints of market-killing recessionary forces for even the gamblers to believe that the Fed has abolished the business cycle.

So by the sheer cowardice and risibility of her speech, Simple Janet has triggered still another robo-trader spasm in the casino. Yet this latest run at resistance points on a stock chart that has been rolling over for nearly a year now underscores how absurd and dangerous 87 months of ZIRP and wealth effects pumping have become.

As we have indicated repeatedly, S&P 500 earnings—–as measured by the honest GAAP accounting that the SEC demands on penalty of jail——-have now fallen 18.5% from their peak. The latter was registered in the LTM period ending in September 2014 and clocked in at $106 per share.

As is shown in the graph below, the index was trading at 1950 at that time. The valuation multiple at a sporty 18.4X, therefore, was already pushing the envelope given the extended age of the expansion.

Indeed, even back then there were plenty of headwinds becoming evident. These included global commodity deflation, a rapid slowdown in the pace of capital spending and the vast build-up of debt and structural barriers to growth throughout China and its EM supply train, as well as Japan, Europe and the US.

In the interim it has all been downhill on the profit and macroeconomic front. By the March 2015 LTM period, S&P reported profits had dropped to $99 per share and have just kept sliding, posting at only $86.44 per share for the December 2015 LTM period just completed.

So there you have it. The casino has actually been trying to mark-down the Bubble Finance inflated stock prices that the Fed’s wealth effects lunacy has generated since the great financial crisis. Yet our Keynesian school marm and her posse just keep finding one excuse after another to feed the algos.

Indeed, Yellen had barely ambled up to the rostrum, and they had the market back up to 2065. After Friday’s further bump to 2072, the math of that is a round 24X earnings.

That’s right. With ample evidence of financial risk and bubbles cropping up everywhere during the past 18 months, Simple Janet stood there at the New York Economics Club podium and threw the robo-traders a big sloppy wet one!

To continue reading: Yelling ‘Stay’ In A Burning Theater—–Yellen Ignites Another Robo-Trader Spasm

Exposed – How Two Janet Yellen Phone Calls Saved The World, by Tyler Durden

From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

Thanks to the just released February diary of Fed chief Yellen, we now know exactly when she called Bank of England Governor (and former Goldman Sachs employee) Marc Carney and ECB President (and former Goldman Sachs employee) Mario Draghi.

Can you guess when?

The answer:

This marked the exact bottom in the market. As someone suddenly decide to panic-buy stocks right as Carney’s 40 minute conversation was over – and all amid spiking CDS, collapsing bank stock prices, a Deutsche Bank which even the “serious” media outlets said was near bankruptcy, surging Yuan vol, and “real” crashing earnings expectations:

And that is how, with just two phone calls, Janet Yellen saved the world.

Unrigged, efficient markets for all:

Did we just get the closest glimpse of Keyser Soze the global Plunge Protection Team communication by phone call? Only the NSA knows…

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-01/inside-janet-yellens-diary-stunning-discovery-two-phone-calls-saved-world

Spot the Difference, from Zero Hedge

One of these is the head of an organization with millions of religiously fanatical followers…

and the other is the Pope.

The Fed Is Bluffing, by Bill Bonner

From Bill Bonner, on a guest post at theburningplatform.com:

Interest Rates Won’t Rise in 2015

The Janet Yellen Fed will not raise interest rates in any meaningful way anytime soon. Instead, she will announce new QE programs. On Wednesday, red was showing up just about everywhere – U.S. stocks, European stocks, Asian stocks, emerging markets stocks, crude oil… but it could have been worse…

U.S. stocks recovered some of their losses for the day, after the minutes of the most recent Fed meeting showed Yellen and team still won’t pull the trigger on a rate hike until certain unspecified conditions are met.

According to the Fed, the conditions for a rate increase are “approaching” but haven’t been met yet. Well, guess what… Conditions will never be met.

Market Morphine

It doesn’t work that way. This economy will never recover – not as long as it is under the current Keynesian management. It is like a patient attended by quack doctors – doomed to get sicker from their quack “cures.” Today’s economy depends on large doses of cheap credit…
And like morphine, you have to up the dosage just to stay in the same place. Take away the drugs, and the pain rises. The pain caused by falling stock prices, for example. Take away the cheap credit… and the buybacks on Wall Street dry up.

That means earnings per share – the ultimate driver of stock prices – fall, too. With falling corporate earnings and stagnant household incomes, the inevitable direction for stock prices is also down.

As we discussed in last Friday’s Diary, we’ve already seen that today’s stock prices are not the result of sober reflection on the part of investors. They do not sit down with a yellow pad and a No. 2 pencil and calculate streams of income over the next 10 years. Instead, they count on the cronies to rig the market for their benefit.

As regular readers know, corporate execs have been borrowing at ultra-low rates and using the money to buy and cancel shares in their own companies. This clever piece of financial engineering reduces the count of outstanding shares and pushes up their value.

The insiders get bonuses… by looting the company’s capital and replacing it with debt. And shareholders get a nice bump in their portfolios. Since 2009, the market cap of the S&P 500 has risen by almost $11.7 trillion. And according to a new report from Aranca Investment Research, S&P 500 companies have spent almost $2.3 trillion on buybacks over the same period.

So about one-fifth of the increase in market cap is due to buybacks. Cheap credit is essential to the looting process. Take it away and the flimflam falls apart. So do stock prices.

To continue reading: The Fed Is Bluffing

Fed Reporter Pedro Da Costa Is Leaving The Wall Street Journal After Asking Yellen “Uncomfortable” Questions, by Tyler Durden

As if the mainstream press needed any further reinforcement, between the WSJ and the Federal Reserve the message is painfully clear: Don’t Rock The Boat! From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:

It was virtually inevitable.

As we reported on June 17, Pedro Da Costa, one of the more determined and controversial Fed reporters, was shocked to learn he was no longer welcome to ask Janet Yellen uncomfortable questions, questions related to the biggest scandal currently gripping the Fed: its leaks of proprietary information to “expert network” Medley Global (recently sold by Pearson to Japan’s Nikkei) and one which has since morphed into a criminal investigation.

As a reminder, this is the Q&A that got Pedro in hot water with Janet Yellen during the March press conference:

PEDRO DA COSTA. Pedro da Costa with Dow Jones Newswires. I guess I have two follow-ups, one with regard to Craig’s question. So, before the IG’s investigation, according to Republican Congressman Hensarling’s letter to your office, he says that, “It is my understanding that although the Federal Reserve’s General Counsel was initially involved in this investigation, the inquiry was dropped at the request of several members of the FOMC.” Now, that predates the IG. I want to know if you could tell us who are these members of the FOMC who struck down this investigation? And doesn’t not revealing these facts kind of go directly against the sort of transparency and accountability that you’re trying to bring to the central bank?

CHAIR YELLEN. That is an allegation that I don’t believe has any basis in fact. I’m not going to go into the details, but I don’t know where that piece of information could possibly have come from.

PEDRO DA COSTA. If I could follow up on his question. I think when you get asked about financial crimes and the public hears you talk about compliance, you get a sense that there’s not enough enforcement involved in these actions, and that it’s merely a case of kind of trying to achieve settlements after the fact. Is there a sense in the regulatory community that financial crimes need to be punished sort of more forcefully in order for them to be—for there to be an actual deterrent against unethical behavior?

CHAIR YELLEN. So, the—you’re talking about within banking organizations? So, the focus of regulators—the banking regulators—is safety and soundness, and what we want to see is changes made as rapidly as possible that will eliminate practices that are unsafe and unsound.

We can’t—only the Justice Department can bring criminal action, and they have taken up cases where they think that that’s appropriate. In some situations, when we are able to identify individuals who were responsible for misdeeds, we can put in place prohibitions that bar them from participating in banking, and we have done so and will continue to do so.

To continue reading: Pedro Da Costa Is Leaving The Wall Street Journal

She Said That? 7/10/15

Today’s quote is from Janet Yellen, a paragraph from a speech she gave today at the City Club of Cleveland. The entire speech was a mind-numbing 3,803 words, or a little over nine single-spaced pages. The quote was towards the end of the speech and most of the audience had probably already left the room, which is perhaps why it has not got a lot of attention.

Very low inflation may not sound like a real problem to many people. However, persistently low price inflation, which can tend to slow the pace of wage increases over time, can weaken the economy by, for example, making it more difficult for households and firms to pay off their debts. A persistent, very low inflation environment also tends to result in chronically low short-term interest rates. This type of situation would leave less scope for the FOMC to respond with its conventional monetary policy tool–namely, a cut in the federal funds rate–to counteract a weakening in the economy.

Very low inflation is indeed a problem, but not in the way Ms. Yellen suggests. In a free market economy with an honest money system that cannot be manipulated by feckless monetary mandarins, deflation will be the order of the day and low interest rates will follow. Why? Because capitalism constantly raises productivity—businesses continuously lower costs—and competition forces producers to lower prices as well. Declining prices are incorporated into interest rates. Lo and behold, when the world got as close as it ever got to free market economics, the Industrial Revolution, prices declined, which meant that real incomes increased even more than nominal incomes, and interest rates were low. Those facts are not found in most history or economics texts, but they are indeed facts, easy to confirm on the Internet with a five-minute search.

American Amoeba, by James Howard Kunstler

From James Howard Kunstler, at kuntsler.com:

The money-moving world waits on tenterhooks for the Wednesday appearance of America’s oracle, Janet Yellen, to step out of her grotto and state whether or not she feels twinges of patience. Wikipedia notes that Pythia, the original priestess of Delphi “…delivered oracles in a frenzied state induced by vapors rising from a chasm in the rock, and that she spoke gibberish which priests interpreted as the enigmatic prophecies preserved in Greek literature.” Some things never change.

Patience for what? Well, whether to raise the Federal Reserve’s benchmark short-term interest rate from near-zero to something microscopically above zero. This is what the world foolishly turns on. And, of course, also some oracular hint as to whether this momentous move might occur in April, June, September, or not at all.

Some canny observers of the vaudeville that US money policy has become — namely, Jim Rickards, David Stockman, Peter Schiff — maintain that Yellen and her Fed are boxed in and can really do nothing. Their policies and interventions regarding the flows of capital have done nothing so far but disable the normal operations of markets and distort the valuation of everything, especially the cost of renting money itself — for that is what happens when you take out a loan. The net result of all that is a financial picture that no longer reflects anything truthful about the actual economy, being a trade in goods and services.

The transparent truthlessness of the Fed’s basic premises go far to explain the chasm between official policy and reality — though it does not explain the appetite for plain lying of the supposedly informed minority cohort of the public, the deciders among us in business, politics, and media. For instance, the employment numbers that came out of the federal government ten days ago saying that the jobless rate is just over 5 percent. Everybody not in a special ed class in America knows that this is a barefaced lie. But nobody except a few mavericks on the web (see above) object to it. Lesser official oracles such as The New York Times and the Wall Street Journal report the lie without reservation and it gets absorbed into the body politic like any other morsel of protoplasm into the mindless amoeba that America has become.

So far, the Fed has tried to merely chatter about the possibility of raising rates as a substitute for actually doing anything. That’s because anything more than a gesture of raising rates will blow up the lucrative carry trade arbitrage enjoyed by the banks that hold the Fed (and everybody else) hostage, as well as the artificially inflated stock markets, and the US government’s ability to service its debt. That’s a lot to blow up. The wondrous levitating S & P index is the Fed’s substitute for reality. While the public’s attention is diverted to that ongoing marvel, they fail to see the appalling instability in currencies around the world, or the booby-traps laid in bond markets everywhere, or the devastation thundering through the oil industry, and the collapse of global trade relations that Tom Friedman said would last forever.

http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/american-amoeba/

To continue reading: American Amoeba

See also: Ms. Yellen Whispers Sweet Nothings In Mr. Market’s Ear, by Robert Gore, SLL, 12/19/14

She Said That? 3/4/15

From Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, in remarks for a speech in New York on Tuesday night:

The risk of regulatory capture is something the Federal Reserve takes very seriously and works very hard to prevent. It is important that anyone serving the Fed feel safe speaking up when they have concerns about bias toward industry, and that those concerns be addressed.

She evidently said this with a straight face. It would be a laughing matter, except the Federal Reserve is supposedly charged with fixing interest rates, keeping America employed, promoting just the right amount of inflation, and elevating stock, real estate, and other asset prices ad infinitum. There is no risk of “regulatory capture” with the Fed because it was designed by bankers for bankers way back in 1913 and has been captured ever since (see The Golden Pinnacle for a fictional treatment of this episode in American history). Come the next crisis, the Fed and the rest of the government will again hop to it and bail out the biggest banks, just as they did in 2008. Although Yellen is a sock puppet, she deserves a small (very small) measure of sympathy. The current Rube Goldbergian contraption known formally as the financial system, informally as “A Skyscraper of Cards,” (SLL, 10/19/14) will probably collapse on her watch, and she will get a disproportionate share of the blame, because everyone “knows” the Fed can control the economy and financial markets at all times. She will deserve some of the blame, but not the virulent attacks that will be directed against her. That skyscraper of cards has been in the making for many decades, through the tenure of several chairs of the Fed.

They Said That? 12/19/14

From the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System press release, issued 12/17/14:

Based on its current assessment, the Committee judges that it can be patient in beginning to normalize the stance of monetary policy. The Committee sees this guidance as consistent with its previous statement that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the 0 to 1/4 percent target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time following the end of its asset purchase program in October, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run goal, and provided that longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20141217a.htm

See “Ms. Yellen Whispers Sweet Nothings In Mr. Market’s Ear,” SLL, earlier today.

She Said That? 10/18/14

From Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Janet Yellen:

Some degree of inequality in income and wealth, of course, would occur even with completely equal opportunity because variations in effort, skill, and luck will produce variations in outcomes. Indeed, some variation in outcomes arguably contributes to economic growth because it creates incentives to work hard, get an education, save, invest, and undertake risk.

Conference on Economic Opportunity and Inequality, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, 10/17/14.

Under laissez faire capitalism, there is no “arguably” about it: the prospect of getting rich, keeping one’s wealth, and keeping it in a store of stable monetary value propels economic growth, far more so than any other system. On the other hand, making central bankers the commissars of our overtaxed, over regulated, welfare-state economy destroys incentives to work hard, plunges college graduates into debt for degrees of little economic value, drives interest rates so low that nobody saves, turns investment markets into casinos, and makes speculation and financial engineering the predominant forms of risk undertaking. Ms. Yellen specified four sources of opportunity: resources available for children, affordable higher education, business ownership, and inheritances, but omitted what is arguably the most important source of opportunity in our state-directed economy: cronies in government. Three nuggets of advice for Ms. Yellen and all the other Washington masters and mistresses of the universe: shut up, get out of our way, and leave us alone.