Tag Archives: PCR tests

CDC/FDA Smoking Gun of Smoking Guns, by Jon Rappoport

Has the SARS-Cov-2 virus ever been isolated? If so, where is the scientific evidence? If not, then how can tests measure it and treatments treat it? From Jon Rappoport at lewrockwell.com:

They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they “contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it’s called a self-fulfilling prophecy

This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin

he CDC has issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions.

The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:

“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”

Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” The CDC isn’t saying that at all.

They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.

In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.

Continue reading→

The Globalist’s Narratives and MSM are failing as they admit PCR Test is proven false and useless– [Letter from Great Britain – 08-14-21], by Austrian Peter

Facts and their dissemination, although still somewhat limited, are exposing the Covid fraud. From Austrian Peter at theburningplatform:

This recent announcement by the leading German newspaper indicates that the instigators of the scamdemic are on the back foot.  There is no doubt that the truth-tellers are gradually winning the argument as more revelations emerge.  Now is the time to capitalise and double down on disseminating our truth at every opportunity.

“In a speech delivered to camera, Julian Reichelt said sorry for Bild’s coverage which was “like poison” and “made you feel like you were a mortal danger to society.” Reichelt directed his main sentiment towards children who have been terrorized by fearmongering media coverage which has caused child depression and suicides to soar across the world.

“To the millions of children in this country for whom our society is responsible, I want to express here what neither our government nor our Chancellor dares to tell you. We ask you to forgive us,” he said.  “Forgive us for this policy which, for a year and a half, has made you victims of violence, neglect, isolation, and loneliness.” “We persuaded our children that they were going to murder their grandma if they dared to be what they are, children; or if they met their friends. None of this has been scientifically proven.” And has been corrupted by false PCR tests: https://summit.news/2021/08/03/editor-in-chief-of-germanys-top-newspaper-apologizes-for-fear-driven-covid-coverage/

YES – you read that right.  The PCR test has been discredited and is to be withdrawn at the end of the year; but why the delay?  Because the globalists need to find another way to ramp up the fear and keep their corrupt agenda going into 2022 with a brand new way of intimidating the unbelievers to take the jab. In the meantime the ‘cases’ keep being reported in Britain even if the Delta variant’ is failing to energise our youth to poison themselves for no good reason.

Continue reading→

About those RT-PCR Tests, by Austrian Peter

A comprehensive analysis of the many flaws of the RT-PCR test, from Austrian Peter at theburningplatform.com:

Reiner Fuellmich is about to instigate legal proceedings against the perpetrators of the Covid-19 scamdemic:  covid-fraud-lawyers-medical-experts-start -legal-proceedings-against WHO   His case rests principally on the inappropriate use of the RT-PCR test.  A colleague of mine has graciously agreed for me to reproduce his assessments of this test – he is not alone. Hat Tip Gerry @ http://boomfinanceandeconomics.com/#/ 

PCR is a difficult technology to grasp because there are so many subtle aspects. PCR technology has been around since 1987 when Kary Mullis invented it.  He won the Nobel Prize for doing so.  It is not a test that clinicians order lightly. In normal clinical medical practice, it is ordered only when dealing with very ill patients. Careful consideration and very careful interpretation are needed and the clinical situation is critical.

Everyone should watch the videos of Kary Mullis on YouTube and Bitchute.  He was a genius and brilliant scientist; unfortunately, he died recently — just before the  Covid outbreak. https://www.bitchute.com/video/8KsH34IGgqBw/

Quote from Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner and inventor of PCR Tests: “Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

Continue reading→

Smoking Gun: Fauci States COVID PCR Test Has Fatal Flaw; Confession From the Beloved” Expert of Experts, by Jon Rappoport

The PCR test is useless at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, and tests are routinely run at cycle thresholds of 40 or higher. From Jon Rappoport at lewrockwell.com:

The COVID PCR test is a complete fraud

This article is part of my current series on the COVID PCR test [1]. These articles prove that the test is fatally flawed, gives rise to hugely inflated and false case numbers, which in turn lead to the unnecessary and brutal lockdowns.

I’m hoping readers will spread this information far and wide.

OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

Well, how about THIS?

July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week In Virology” [2]: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at the 3m50s mark) [2]: “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

That’s called a false positive.

Continue reading→

Patient Grills Doctor; Off the Record, by Jon Rappoport

Are doctors following the science or orders? From Jon Rappoport at lewrockwell.com:

Good to see you again. It’s been a while. You’re here because your employer wants you to get tested?

That’s right, Doctor. It’s more or less an order. If I don’t comply, I can’t work for the company. I lose my job.

And you don’t want to get tested?

I have problems with the test.

What problems?

The number of cycles.

Excuse me?

Doctor, you’re aware they run the PCR test in cycles?

Sorry, never heard of that. What are you talking about?

Well, they take a swab sample from me. Then they amplify a tiny, tiny part of the sample many times. That’s what the test does. Each leap in amplification is called a cycle.

Fascinating.

The number of cycles determines the outcome. If they run the test at 36 cycles or higher, the result is meaningless. But at those high levels, there are many, many false positives. So I could easily register as “infected by the virus,” if the lab uses too many cycles.

Where are you getting all this information?

From a number of sources.

Name one.

Anthony Fauci.

Continue reading→

The Criminal WHO Blows Its Own Cover: Fake PCR Test, by Jon Rappoport

Even the WHO admits the PCR test doesn’t do what it’s purported to do. From Jon Rappoport at lewrockwell.com:

In early 2020, the WHO accepted a PCR test for “SARS-CoV-2” that was designed without having possession of the virus. Yet the test is meant to detect…the missing virus. This is evidence of deep criminal intent. [1]

But as of December 14, 2020, WHO has made a correction [2]. Thereby blowing its own cover. Why?

Two reasons. Huge numbers of people have caught on to the PCR test scam. And by their correction, WHO paves the way for “declining COVID case numbers”—thereby making it appear the new vaccine is a roaring success. I predicted this development. [3] [4]

A brief review. The PCR test (a complete fraud for several reasons) is run in “cycles.” Each cycle is a giant magnification of a tiny portion of the swab sample taken from the patient.

As I’ve reported, even Tony Fauci readily asserts that if the PCR is run at 35 cycles or higher, it’s meaningless. [5] [6]

Every positive result—indicating “infection with the virus”—occurring at 35 cycles or higher is meaningless.

BUT, as I’ve also pointed out, public health agencies recommend running the PCR test at up to 40 cycles. Therefore, labs comply.

Therefore, millions upon millions of PCR tests results, over the last nine months, which indicate “infection,” are a vast lie.

Therefore, the COVID case numbers are a vast lie, and the lockdowns, which are based on those numbers, are absurd, insane, criminal, and predatory.

Continue reading→

 

COVID-19 Testing Scandal Deepens, by Joseph Mercola

A completely unsuitable test is being used for Covid-19 and its cycle threshold is then cranked up to generate a lot of false positives that are considered “cases.” From Joseph Mercola at lewrockwell.com:

Positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests have been used as the justification for keeping large portions of the world locked down for the past nine months. Not reliable hospitalization or death rates; just positive PCR test numbers — a large portion of which are from people who have no symptoms of actual illness — are the triggers behind the shutdowns.

Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal. Why? Because we’re now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they’re used as they have been so far.

Why PCR Tests Are the Wrong Tool to Assess Pandemic Threat

We now know that PCR tests:

1.Cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool — For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a “COVID-19 case.”

As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness1 lecture, featured in “How Medical Technocracy Made the Plandemic Possible,” media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness.

Medically speaking, a “case” refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, “case,” has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, “That is not epidemiology. That’s fraud.”

Continue reading→